garmischgirl wrote:
So these are the first innovations deserving an asterisk??? Does each evolution of spikes deserve it's own asterisk? Not to mention training shoes, apparel, methods, etc.
I actually agree with you. There is no need to put an asterisk next to the "blood doping era" of Lasse Viren or the EPO era of the late 1990s and early 2000s. We do not need a third asterisk next to the super shoes and wavelight era.
We all know how and why records get broken. We can look past that because we simply love the sport too much to look away even when the playing field shifts further and further away from the pure eras of Bannister and Zátopek.
The problem I have is that people from outside the sport certainly don't know that the East German and Soviet era records are bogus or the Chinese "turtle blood soup" era is an obvious lie. People outside the sport see these records and have no way to know what anything means anymore.
Non-insiders might just assume, based on who has the faster PR, that Cooper Teare is a "better" miler than Jim Ryun. What we all know is that if the playing field was even, Ryun would be better head-to-head.
If you think these times/records are legit, then you also think Noah Droddy in supershoes is a better marathoner (based on his much faster PR) than Abebe Bikila.
The problem with tech is that it makes it impossible to compare across eras.
Wouldn't you want to see what Josh Kerr could run in the same shoes that Jim Ryun had? I'd be curious. What if he ran like 3:32? Wouldn't that be interesting to you?
p.s. I wear Vaporflys when I want to run fast. The are awesome and feel amazing.