Biological male sprinter takes 3rd in the 200m at D3 nationals

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Sprinter guy wrote:

Nah. Only third was the issue. First and second were both attractive and smart women. If you think otherwise you need your eyes checked. Third place finisher is openly cheating. Not even trying to hide it. Embarrassing for the sport.

But change your gender and you too can go from being a 24.12 second running nerdy athlete on the men’s team to an All-American!

What does this have anything to do with being "attractive"? Would they be less deserving if they were unattractive? Would you accept a trans athlete if she were attractive?

Those women are athletes, not Onlyfans content creators.

Sprinter guy3 wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

What does this have anything to do with being "attractive"? Would they be less deserving if they were unattractive? Would you accept a trans athlete if she were attractive?

Those women are athletes, not Onlyfans content creators.

Poster was hinting that top finishers were transgender. Anyone with eyes knows that’s not the case. That’s all that I meant.

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

That's nonsense. The top two finishers here are not trans. But you cannot detect trans athletes with "eyeball tests." If you think you can, you are living in alternative reality.

There are 34 trans athletes who have competed in women's NCAA sports for the current season (2023-24). Only six of them are known to the public, including one who was recently outed in her third season as a college athlete. If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Sprinter guy3 wrote:

Poster was hinting that top finishers were transgender. Anyone with eyes knows that’s not the case. That’s all that I meant.

That's nonsense. The top two finishers here are not trans. But you cannot detect trans athletes with "eyeball tests." If you think you can, you are living in alternative reality.

There are 34 trans athletes who have competed in women's NCAA sports for the current season (2023-24). Only six of them are known to the public, including one who was recently outed in her third season as a college athlete. If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

fjb - wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

That's nonsense. The top two finishers here are not trans. But you cannot detect trans athletes with "eyeball tests." If you think you can, you are living in alternative reality.

There are 34 trans athletes who have competed in women's NCAA sports for the current season (2023-24). Only six of them are known to the public, including one who was recently outed in her third season as a college athlete. If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

Have any worn bun huggers or even looked vaguely feminine?

Sprinter Guy3 wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

That's nonsense. The top two finishers here are not trans. But you cannot detect trans athletes with "eyeball tests." If you think you can, you are living in alternative reality.

There are 34 trans athletes who have competed in women's NCAA sports for the current season (2023-24). Only six of them are known to the public, including one who was recently outed in her third season as a college athlete. If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

Go back and watch the finals again and tell me you can’t tell with your eyeballs (in most cases, anyway). I’ll wait.

D3 Enjoyer wrote:

The problem with y’all is that you don’t look at this as an opportunity. With trans athletes and legalized gambling, what better way is there to make money than to bet on biologically male athletes in these women’s races?

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Those women are athletes, not Onlyfans content creators.

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Sprinter Guy3 wrote:

Go back and watch the finals again and tell me you can’t tell with your eyeballs (in most cases, anyway). I’ll wait.

You are completely missing the point. The point is NOT that people cannot detect Schreiner is trans. That's the easy part.

The point is that just because someone "looks feminine" it does not mean she is not trans. You have probably seen many trans women without knowing they are trans. You might have even found some of them attractive.

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

Democrats ruin women\'s sports wrote:

Link:results.leonetiming.com/?mid=7114

Discus

sure bout dat? wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

If it's so easy to identify trans athletes with eyeball tests, we would know about the other 28 athletes.

Something tells me any women who have competed directly against the other 28 know. The phony women who become well known tend to be those who do well at regional or national competitions. If there’s some 5 foot 5 inch tall dude who decided to ID as a chick who plays volleyball for some school you’ve never heard of… it’s still unfair because that’s still a spot on the team he’s stolen.

D3 Enjoyer wrote:

The problem with y’all is that you don’t look at this as an opportunity. With trans athletes and legalized gambling, what better way is there to make money than to bet on biologically male athletes in these women’s races?

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

sure bout dat? wrote:

Something tells me any women who have competed directly against the other 28 know. The phony women who become well known tend to be those who do well at regional or national competitions. If there’s some 5 foot 5 inch tall dude who decided to ID as a chick who plays volleyball for some school you’ve never heard of… it’s still unfair because that’s still a spot on the team he’s stolen.

Incorrect!

This D3 rower is on the novice team.

Link:athletics.ithaca.edu/sports/womens-cre...

This D3 softball player did not play for the entire season. (Her team went 10-26)

Link:gochathamcougars.com/sports/softball/r...

I am not even sure if they took away roster spots from anyone. Those would have probably left vacant.

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Incorrect!

This D3 rower is on the novice team.

Link:athletics.ithaca.edu/sports/womens-cre...

This D3 softball player did not play for the entire season. (Her team went 10-26)

Link:gochathamcougars.com/sports/softball/r...

I am not even sure if they took away roster spots from anyone. Those would have probably left vacant.

It doesn't matter if they play or not.

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

Incorrect!

This D3 rower is on the novice team.

Link:athletics.ithaca.edu/sports/womens-cre...

This D3 softball player did not play for the entire season. (Her team went 10-26)

Link:gochathamcougars.com/sports/softball/r...

I am not even sure if they took away roster spots from anyone. Those would have probably left vacant.

It doesn't matter if they play or not.

RossiCheated wrote:

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

It doesn't matter if they play or not.

Correct.

It is a mistake to get baited into conversations about whether they play, or play a lot, or score or displace other athletes or alter the team scores, or win anything, or about the level of sport at which it may or may not matter.

They shouldn't be on the roster. Nothing further needs to be discussed.

Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:

RossiCheated wrote:

Correct.

It is a mistake to get baited into conversations about whether they play, or play a lot, or score or displace other athletes or alter the team scores, or win anything, or about the level of sport at which it may or may not matter.

They shouldn't be on the roster. Nothing further needs to be discussed.

Why? I thought the argument was about "protecting women's sports." Why do they need to be "protected" from people who are not displacing anyone and not changing the outcome of the competitions?

Even the Republicans who sponsored HR 734 say trans athletes should be allowed to train and practice with the team. Is the D3 softball player at Chatham University endangering her teammates simply by participating in the team practice?