Only if she was hot and had a friend with solid back side mechanics.
Only if she was hot and had a friend with solid back side mechanics.
rooting for the anti-hero wrote:
I don't see why not
If she's monogamous with me, I wouldn't have a problem if she wants to pursue women on the side
Absolutely. And I did. Which led to several FMF threesomes. Some of the most exciting sex in my life. Miss it!
Iowa chick runner wrote:
I'm bi and my gf and I often have a guy join us, you know sometimes toys just don't replace the real thing. Our only rule is no one-on-ones with guys. If a guy is involved then we both must be too.
Happy running all.
OMG. Sex with two gals with no attachments? I've only read about those things. It actually exists?
My 'research' confirms this to be true
What rights don't gays have in the US?
rooting for the anti-hero wrote:
I don't see why not
If she's monogamous with me, I wouldn't have a problem if she wants to pursue women on the side
No because that would also mean she's a lib. She'd have all sorts of weird boundary issues
rooting for the anti-hero wrote:
I don't see why not
If she's monogamous with me, I wouldn't have a problem if she wants to pursue women on the side
You know what they say - if you date someone bi, you're either liberal or desperate.
Iowa chick runner wrote:
I'm bi and my gf and I often have a guy join us, you know sometimes toys just don't replace the real thing. Our only rule is no one-on-ones with guys. If a guy is involved then we both must be too.
Happy running all.
That sounds fun