ge wrote:
my experience is most coaches encourage white sprinters to choose a different event, even if the talent is there.
My experience is that if a coach is any good, they wouldn’t do that.
This post was removed.
ge wrote:
my experience is most coaches encourage white sprinters to choose a different event, even if the talent is there.
My experience is that if a coach is any good, they wouldn’t do that.
You are truly a sick person. Stop reading Jack Chick tracts and find something productive to do with your life.
bigmig19 wrote:
I think we might be biased by the recent emergence of Steiner in a speed event, Bol, and now whats her face the HS girl.
But, if it were true, the women would seem to have a higher ceiling against each other if they have relatively higher T (legal or otherwise), or born with greater strength, or indeed are microdosing? In other words, physiologically the spectrum of ability might be wider in the women's division?
Thus...people of no color can reach great heights with slightly more frequency in womens events? Lots of issues with my theory, I just think the opportunity to excel if you hit the genetic jackpot might be easier (less competition with your genetic make up) in protected division (regardless of race)??
Can we say in the mens division, awesome strength, leg turnover is everywhere? I think so. So it seems that if one race seems to have it with more frequency (say, west africans vs China in the 100, or vs. europeans in the NBA), they will dominate. I have not checked but I wonder if the ratio of white players in the WNBA is far greater than NBA? I would guess yes.
WNBA is about 20% white. Only slightly higher than NBA. (17%) Two of the ten players on All-WNBA teams are white (Stewart and Ionescu). The same as two of the top ten in NBA (Jokic and Doncic.)
Rip western society wrote:
Because white men have been subjected to slow but steady emasculation over the last 30+ years
I guess that’s what we get for being the most intelligent and well rounded demographic. People get jealous.
😂😂
My hypothesis: There is less depth of competition on the women's side, while the men's side has been taken to (and beyond) the limits of natural human ability. Secondly, I think there is more room for efficiency improvements with women's running, so if there's an athlete who can get an advantage here it can make up for other areas. Finally, I believe PEDs have a bigger impact on women than men.
Generally speaking, non white countries tend to have less womens rights and countries with less womens rights are more likely to shun womens sports. So white women look better than white men becasue white women are competing with many countries that supress womens sports. White men compete against basically 0 countries that supress mens sports.
Belarussiya wrote:
A white guy has recently ran a 3:44 mile and 3:27 1500. Can any woman do that ?
Kate Tuohy?