NYT article about Nikki Hiltz

“Right now, competing in the women’s category still feels OK for me and my gender and where I’m at with that journey,” Hiltz said

i don't like nikki. i find this line of thinking to be completely self absorbed. but i won't go out of my way to label she/her unless THEY really came out and said that none of the runners should be referred to as he/him she/her.

They can also be used as a singular, gender neutral pronoun. This has been present in English since at least the publication of the King James Bible in the early 17th Century.

Well, Nikki certainly runs faster than most of the men on letsrun complaining about their pronouns.

Yes, Nikki was on some podcast and thanked the host for not referring to the race as a woman’s race then said the people she races against should be called runners or athletes.

I have ran a faster mile than Nikki Hiltz’s 1500 PR.

Hiltz is currently ranked 14th in the women’s 1500. Hiltz is a woman and I don’t get why we have to pretend she isn’t.

Prove it by providing your name and linking to your results.

Nikki and who else ? She’s improved a lot in Flagstaff

I value my privacy and don’t want to be canceled by the “tolerant” left so I won’t.

And yet losers will continue to trot out the tired “why doesn’t she ever race men?!” garbage.

The irony of you using “have ran” in your attempt to own Nikki made me chuckle.

As believable as your 150+ IQ.

Hiltz implicitly admits that Hiltz is a woman here.

When did I ever say that? Moron.

She’s trans-racial, too!?

They be now prettier and have more fast twitch than I thought!

Ahhh I see, you have no balls, which by your definition makes you a woman.

It just shows how fake it is.

there is nothing fake about narcissism.