You will lose tour mind when Tuohy tests positive.
You will lose tour mind when Tuohy tests positive.
Awsi Dooger wrote:
She shouldn't respond. The doping dunces play this game because they can't lose. They have no talent or insight whatsoever. There are going to be some doping bans every year. The dunces use that minuscule slice to proclaim everyone is dirty. And when an athlete has nothing but negative tests they use the who cares response that the simpleton tweeted to Wiley.
There should be two ongoing threads here. One with the names of every current/recent track and field athlete who has tested positive and/or had whereabouts failures. The other thread contains all the names who don't fit either category.
That War and Peace scroll would supply the necessary bottom line jolt.
And the coaches and their squads?
I mean, what would you do if a fellow squad member got banned?
Nah. I am a realist about this sport. KT is a legitimate natural talent, but the sport at the pro level is dirty to the core.
What distance running needs is a watershed like what happened in cycling. You had riders who never failed a test in a more scrutinized sport confessing to doping for their entire ten year careers, like Rasmussen who admitted taking everything under the sun (epo, steroids, insulin, hgh, etc) despite never testing positive.
The resident doping pollyanna speakth. Everyone is a dunce even when you are spectacularly wrong. Quite the philosophy.
Wiley is Silky Fast wrote:
How is a person who has passed every test more obvious than somebody who has failed? You need some remedial work on basic logic.
Ask Lance, El G, Komen,Aouita…
astro wrote:
Nah. I am a realist about this sport. KT is a legitimate natural talent, but the sport at the pro level is dirty to the core.
What distance running needs is a watershed like what happened in cycling. You had riders who never failed a test in a more scrutinized sport confessing to doping for their entire ten year careers, like Rasmussen who admitted taking everything under the sun (epo, steroids, insulin, hgh, etc) despite never testing positive.
Class of '22 Wiley was 2nd fastest freshman in the nation that year, and then the fastest junior and senior year. Soph year a wash due to covid. Sounds like textbook definition of a legitimate natural talent, unless you think she was doping since middle school.
Only if Tuohy is.
Ask them what? Lance tested positive. So you are saying he is less suspicious than other cyclists who tested negative? That makes no sense.
astro wrote:
Nah. I am a realist about this sport. KT is a legitimate natural talent, but the sport at the pro level is dirty to the core.
What distance running needs is a watershed like what happened in cycling. You had riders who never failed a test in a more scrutinized sport confessing to doping for their entire ten year careers, like Rasmussen who admitted taking everything under the sun (epo, steroids, insulin, hgh, etc) despite never testing positive.
By all measures Wiley appears to have more natural talent than Tuohy. Faster at a younger age, more range.
Lance didn’t test positive
astro wrote:
Nah. I am a realist about this sport. KT is a legitimate natural talent, but the sport at the pro level is dirty to the core.
What distance running needs is a watershed like what happened in cycling. You had riders who never failed a test in a more scrutinized sport confessing to doping for their entire ten year careers, like Rasmussen who admitted taking everything under the sun (epo, steroids, insulin, hgh, etc) despite never testing positive.
Wiley ran 2:04 and 4:26 in high school. 4:26 is a high school record. Wiley was consistently the fastest girl in the country in her age group. This was all while still playing soccer in the fall and not training fully for XC.
She never ran more than 40 miles per week and her longest runs were 8 miles.
Her junior year she closed a 4:45 mile with a 62.68. She split 56 on 4x4s in high school as a junior.
Mark Wetmore didn't think she was a doper. Neither did Jenny Simpson (who met her when she visited Colorado).
Wiley is Silky Fast wrote:
Ask them what? Lance tested positive. So you are saying he is less suspicious than other cyclists who tested negative? That makes no sense.
You can calm down. Whether she dopes or not is irrelevant. The governing bodies of this sport don’t care. They have decided that fast times are more important than integrity. The gray area will expand. The cheater shoes will get better. The tracks will get bouncier. The dopers will stay miles ahead of the testers and people like you will ooh and aah over the “natural” improvements.
Still going with this straw grasping? Her times were nothing special and were comparable to what other good high school runners were running. She was a good high school runner until that 1600 that Lauren paced for her. Nothing more.
We even have the multisport athlete bs imported from Lauren's career. Plus she was "undertrained." Any other pitiful cliches? That 4:26 was her senior year when she was deep into her relationship with the Johnsons with Lauren pacing her. These lame "explanations" are so tedious. Colorado was pursuing her before the scandal broke publicly.
I LOVE how Addy is methodically and totally CRUSHING all the petty naysayers piece by piece. It’s great that she put out there that she’s clean. Her simple, firm response makes all those meaningless haters totally lose their shlt. I’m glad she didn’t listen to all the crap social media advice.
Not long from now, Addy will be the best and the negative pos detractors will just have their miserable lives. Go, Addy go!
Yeah CU usually pursues mediocre runners. You’ve totally lost the plot!
Yes because dopers never professed their innocence before. Well except all the ones that have. We even have whole books from Landis and Armstrong claiming innocence and Houlihan's comedic gofundme "defense" fund as she proves her innocence. No one is buying it. I knew how this would play out. Commonsense says they lower the profile during the scandal. But this was always a double down group of clowns. No guarantee you will get caught, so hi ho silver! LOL.
You cannot read. Even the vote manipulation is pathetic. Wiley was a good national level high school runner, the type that can compete at Brooks or NB year after year, no more or less. Every class has them year after year. It was only when she entered the full Johnson experience as a senior in that weird 1600m that she emerged out of nowhere as the thread was entitled. Look, no one is buying it and Wiley made herself radioactive. Hope it is worth it.
Yeah, I’m sure that in February of her HS freshman year she was asked to take the peds that would enable her to run so fast.
Her story is the epitome of what it looks like when someone has tremendous talent.
You’re just an old boomer hater
astro wrote:
Still going with this straw grasping? Her times were nothing special and were comparable to what other good high school runners were running. She was a good high school runner until that 1600 that Lauren paced for her. Nothing more.
You are the one grasping at straws at this point. KT isn’t even on Wiley’s radar anymore. Your obsession isn’t in the picture.