Then this is great news! Something definitely wrong with the testing procedure when a clean sample is showing traces of a banned substance - that's extremely problematic and something that clearly needs an explanation. Will be great to see Bol back in action asap!
Then this is great news! Something definitely wrong with the testing procedure when a clean sample is showing traces of a banned substance - that's extremely problematic and something that clearly needs an explanation. Will be great to see Bol back in action asap!
Then this is great news! Something definitely wrong with the testing procedure when a clean sample is showing traces of a banned substance - that's extremely problematic and something that clearly needs an explanation. Will be great to see Bol back in action asap!
the test doesn't show traces of epo in the sense a number comes up as being X parts per million or anything distinct like that
with the epo test it's essentially a scientist's artistic interpretation of stains
testing in general is far from perfect, but testing for epo is still very problematic
Thanks you can stay at home VINDICATED in Letsrun terms. I’m happy to hear it because I appreciate the transparency of your group, your posting here and that doesn’t jibe with sneaking around with EPO.
For the record, we don't know the results of the B test yet. We are sitting here every day (every second) waiting for them to come thru.
Ask yourself, if you NEVER took EPO and a test comes back saying you did, wouldn't it be natural to question the test? Wouldn't you want to know how it could possibly happen?
Coevett - pull you head in mate. Some of the comments you've made lately border on the line of pure racism. I can handle the drug cheat comments, but not the ones in relation to race.
Interesting. I heard someone at Millrose from someone who said essentially "word out of Autralia is Peter Bol's B came back negative."
I even thought of emailing you to find out if that was the case but was busy with the meet. So this was like 57 hours ago.