Here is one of the most entertaining track races I have ever seen. And none of them is a world class runner. (Not even the anchor leg of the winning team.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVhjAXEyjMI&list=PL0970FFD1B461EEB7&index=7
Here is one of the most entertaining track races I have ever seen. And none of them is a world class runner. (Not even the anchor leg of the winning team.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVhjAXEyjMI&list=PL0970FFD1B461EEB7&index=7
fisky wrote:
track nice very club wrote:
An exception to this I can think of is some of my non-runner friends got into watching the T&F during the olympics, so it was cool to share it with them. Outside of the olympics, they have no interest.
What do you think are the barriers to T&F becoming a mainstream spectator sport?
Very few of my running friends follow pro runners. T&F has two huge barriers.
1. Most events are boring, even to recreational runners. In the 1500, 5000, 10000, and marathon, runners mostly run in a pack to the last lap or few miles... boring. In the 200 and 400, it's hard to tell who is winning until the runners are out of the final turn. In the field events, there is no sense of how high the bar is in the high jump or pole vault. In the throws, you see the implement land near a line... is it 60 meters? 70 meters? There's really no sense of how far that is on TV.
2. And even more important, there is no continuity and no overall team winner because there is no team scoring at the pro level. In football, soccer, baseball, and basketball, there is continuity from one play to the next and there is an eventual winner.
3. There's seldom a shift in momentum or the intervention of luck to make the outcome more exciting. In other individual sports... golf and tennis... momentum can shift. A ball can hit the lip of a sand trap and either roll to the hole or back into the trap. In tennis, the ball can hit the top of the net and either fall over or back. A player can slip. A ball can either kiss the line or be another mm to the side and out of play. Luck can play a role in track, but it's rare.
4. There is no outside participation to make the outcome more uncertain and thus more exciting. There are no coaches making 4th and 1 decisions to kick or go for it. There are no referees to give out penalty kicks or make iffy calls on pass interference. The closest track comes to this is false starts in the 100m, which adds a level of excitement to the 100m and the short hurdles that isn't present in other events.
T&F will never have the audience of other sports. It's just too boring. Heck, I've been a runner for 40 years and I only follow the Olympics, the Trials, and a few other events.
I've had similar thoughts for a long time. Take a look though this website and tell me what you think. It's a re-formatting of track and field with a focus on entertainment
https://teamathletics931801021.wordpress.com/Southern California has millions of Olympic hopefuls from all countries training here every day and we follow many sports not just our own specialty.
I watch Diamond League meets and other events like Millrose. I don’t really care about the field events. I started running in my 20s and was introduced to this site in my mid 20s, but was never competitive and never ran for a team.
I think the sport would benefit from more YouTube type races with off distances to gain a larger fan base. Events like Richardson vs. Mu over 300M. Ajee Wilson vs Purrier over 1000M.
Anything over a mile is not that exciting, although Kipchoge’s sub 2 attempt got a lot of press.
I didn't take up running until I was about 40. I played other sports. That said, I've been a fan of running, pretty much all events, since I was a kid in the 70's.
I know many parents of high school and college runners who have become big track fans.
My wife follows T&F whether she wants to or not.
Bring the sport to the masses, and spice it up
**In 1985, although I was a road and cross country runner, I participated in a "Devil takes the Hindmost" (Elimination) 3,000 race, as half time entertainment in at a pro football (soccer) game.
With some good judgement I managed to stay to the end and get third.
Really interesting and fun for both the spectator and the participant.
There are probably alaso a lot of other ways to make it more interesting and accessible.
I remember onec TV an iconic horse race was preceded by a race including a future world maraton champ...who can guess location and name??
**BTW it was a last minute request, the organisers 'just thought' we could run around field at half time, but we had to measure and chalk around the outside of playing field while the 1st half was on...and the grass wasn't cut outside the sidelines!!