more likely wrote:
lost the weight wrote:
Discus.
shotput
Long arms, so maybe javelin would be more her speed.
more likely wrote:
lost the weight wrote:
Discus.
shotput
Long arms, so maybe javelin would be more her speed.
irunfastXC wrote:
She's going to win this race. If she doesn't, she'll still be top-5.
This is my prediction:
1. Elle Purrier St. Pierre 4:18.0
2. Jessica Hull 4:19.4
3. Josette Norris 4:19.7
4. Konstanze Klosterhalfen 4:21.0
5. Shannon Osika 4:21.2
6. Heather MacLean 4:22.8
7. Sage Hurta 4:23.4
8. Cory McGee 4:23.7
9. Nikki Hiltz 4:24.7
10. Ella Donaghu 4:27.3
11. Anna Camp 4:27.5
12. Athing Mu 4:29.8
John Wesley Harding wrote:
irunfastXC wrote:
She's going to win this race. If she doesn't, she'll still be top-5.
This is my prediction:
1. Elle Purrier St. Pierre 4:18.0
2. Jessica Hull 4:19.4
3. Josette Norris 4:19.7
4. Konstanze Klosterhalfen 4:21.0
5. Shannon Osika 4:21.2
6. Heather MacLean 4:22.8
7. Sage Hurta 4:23.4
8. Cory McGee 4:23.7
9. Nikki Hiltz 4:24.7
10. Ella Donaghu 4:27.3
11. Anna Camp 4:27.5
12. Athing Mu 4:29.8
Thing is… this would still be a great result for her.
Jo72 wrote:
But why the mile?
Because she can mofo.
the macdaddy og yoo wrote:
John Wesley Harding wrote:
This is my prediction:
1. Elle Purrier St. Pierre 4:18.0
2. Jessica Hull 4:19.4
3. Josette Norris 4:19.7
4. Konstanze Klosterhalfen 4:21.0
5. Shannon Osika 4:21.2
6. Heather MacLean 4:22.8
7. Sage Hurta 4:23.4
8. Cory McGee 4:23.7
9. Nikki Hiltz 4:24.7
10. Ella Donaghu 4:27.3
11. Anna Camp 4:27.5
12. Athing Mu 4:29.8
Thing is… this would still be a great result for her.
Agreed - and it would bode well for her 800m shape.
Show would win the NCAA mile if she had stayed.
I’d predict her running something in the 4:22-4:24 range, I think that you are underestimating her aerobic capabilities quite a bit. Like an earlier commenter made for comparison, Raevyn Rogers has run a 4:29 mile. Ajee has run a 4:05, equivalent to about a 4:23 or so.
industrial wrote:
I’d predict her running something in the 4:22-4:24 range, I think that you are underestimating her aerobic capabilities quite a bit. Like an earlier commenter made for comparison, Raevyn Rogers has run a 4:29 mile. Ajee has run a 4:05, equivalent to about a 4:23 or so.
Yeap, it's going to be another OMG from Athing Mu.
This will only be interesting if she tries to run from the front.
I live near nyc and was just going to buy tickets.....holy cow they are expensive! (200 bucks)
nevermind, no wonder this is a dying sport
4:29.24 on a good day.
Tickets are available at $22 - less than the cost of going to the movies. And, reserved seats at Millrose for $30.
youawarebrah wrote:
I live near nyc and was just going to buy tickets.....holy cow they are expensive! (200 bucks)
nevermind, no wonder this is a dying sport
track is a dying sports however this isnt a good example because there were plenty of cheap tickets and people bought them well in advance
ill be on the floor :)
There are still cheap tickets.
industrial wrote:
I’d predict her running something in the 4:22-4:24 range, I think that you are underestimating her aerobic capabilities quite a bit. Like an earlier commenter made for comparison, Raevyn Rogers has run a 4:29 mile. Ajee has run a 4:05, equivalent to about a 4:23 or so.
I believe Rogers and especially Wilson likely have greater potential at the mile than Mu. Notice how they’re not 49” open 400 runners.
So the slower the 400, the faster the mile? I can run a 400 in 65. I should be able to run 4:20 I guess.
moo moo wrote:
So the slower the 400, the faster the mile? I can run a 400 in 65. I should be able to run 4:20 I guess.
This is too stupid for me to waste my time on.
So then the faster runner is faster at the mile? It has to be one or the other.
My son ran 49 and 4:10 in HS and he was the fastest on his team in the 400 and the mile. I guess It makes your point that a faster 400 results in a faster mile.