energeticlotuseater wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
The whole planet would benefit from having Japan’s birthrate.
This is actually true.
The “greens” who yell about global warming and what not are missing the most obvious problem.
There are simply too many humans on earth. The international birth rate needs to be around 1 to 2 (at most) children per woman.
We must not slide into ecofascism or Malthusianism which will become commonplace as climate change becomes undeniable. It inevitably leads to eugenicist arguments.
The global birthrate has collapsed and is already 2.4 children, with the replacement number 2.1 in developed nations and as high as 3.5 in less developed ones.
Also, the population and birth rate are not the same as if age skews younger the population will still be increasing in absolute numbers for many years even with a sub replacement birth rate. So if you look at population against carbon emissions it's easy to think that's the cause but if you look at the birth rate, it's inverted - it coincides with a decrease in human fertility.
So the seeds have been sown for a population decline in the 22nd century. That might seem a long way off but babies born today will easily live to see it and there's even some college graduates from this year who'll get to see New Years Day 2100
The challenges of demographic aging is with us already and will be just as problematic as climate change.