Is it true that some women are getting "shortpilled"?

OozmaKappa wrote:

Wjmjlv wrote:

As someone who is more intelligent than you, I can tell you that weight is not entirely in one’s control. Please educate yourself.

Wait is entirely in your control. Being overweight is the reflection of an individual's habitual lack of self restraint and overindulgence on unhealthy consumption, 100% of the time. If you're fat, you did that to yourself. You can tell a lot about a person's character by the size of their waist.

Hi,

What positive character traits do fat people inherently lack?

r u trolling wrote:

Hi,

What positive character traits do fat people inherently lack?

Willpower and priority on being healthy.

Priority on being healthy is not a character trait.

Willpower in one aspect does not mean they lack willpower overall. Many fat people have willpower when it comes to career success, for example.

OozmaKappa wrote:

Wjmjlv wrote:

As someone who is more intelligent than you, I can tell you that weight is not entirely in one’s control. Please educate yourself.

Wait is entirely in your control. Being overweight is the reflection of an individual's habitual lack of self restraint and overindulgence on unhealthy consumption, 100% of the time. If you're fat, you did that to yourself. You can tell a lot about a person's character by the size of their waist.

There's a ton of threads on here about the need to lift or the need to eat a healthy diet and a million different answers. Are carbs good or bad? How much protein? Am I doing too much cardio? Do I need a six pack? Should I take supplements? Is BMI a good measure? How much recovery do I need? It doesn't seem like most people have the information to be in control.

I know it sounds strange but how do you know what you're doing is healthy? It's just as easy for people to overestimate how much exercise they need and underestimate how much food, as it is the other way around. You need to have realistic understanding of yourself to be able to make these decisions.

Also, we're not encouraged to eat and drink healthily. I've seen lots of Coca-Cola commercials but none that encourages me to drink tap water. They obviously increase consumption, otherwise the Coca-Cola company wouldn't commission them. If we just ate what we need they'd be no profit and stores would close. It's almost like we have to be obese or we starve.

There's also changing advice which makes you question whether anyone actually knows the answers. 10 years ago fruit juice was healthy but now it's not. Low fat products were good but now they make no difference at all. If you're overweight and have a 40 hour a week desk job and 3 kids and you can't find the answers to basic questions there's no chance of you getting out of the situation you're in.

Priority on health ISN'T a positive character trait? Okie dokie then.

Koko the Gorilla wrote:

Priority on health ISN'T a positive character trait? Okie dokie then.

It isn’t a character trait. Positive or negative.

A person’s character traits are their attitudes and behaviors, so the priority they place on health and wellbeing is most definitely a charter trait.

r u trolling wrote:

Koko the Gorilla wrote:

Priority on health ISN'T a positive character trait? Okie dokie then.

It isn’t a character trait. Positive or negative.

I think caring about your health is a positive character trait. We'll just have to agree to disagree on that.

And re the doctor. Yeah women would probably prefer him to be taller but they would also prefer him over a marginally employed taller guy.

Height is just one factor women are interested in.

White collar women are also now shopping around in the blue collar guy isle. Women outnumber men at university. I’ve even heard of women buying their own engagement ring for her guy to give her and show off to her friends.

T steamrolled them wrote:

Women don't want these little Napoleon guys hanging around. They look idiotic. Any guys that are 5'6" and shorter, like Marco "Foam" Rubio for example, isn't even a man. They are like a manlet or something.

And it's even worse if the guy is short AND dumb, like Adam Schiff.

OozmaKappa wrote:

Wjmjlv wrote:

Just as you can get an overall higher quality mate if you are willing to date above your weight. Go for it!

You can change your weight, but not your height. If youre fat, you should be ashamed of yourself because that is entirely your fault.

Wrong. You an change your height.

.

r u trolling wrote:

Priority on being healthy is not a character trait.

Willpower in one aspect does not mean they lack willpower overall. Many fat people have willpower when it comes to career success, for example.

Many fat people cannot control the quantity of food they eat. Heavy set women try to make themselves thinner by wearing high heel shoes, fat men can only wear baggy clothing and trucker hats with funny logos . The worste combo is the short jacked gym bro with a bald spot. They take themselves out of a short pilled group.

If you were living a good life, you wouldn't be posting on this thread my dude. So whether what you posted is true or a lie, I hope you find some direction. And yes, I hope I do too!

Can vouch that having a good job and steady income (I am also a doctor that is 5ft 6inchrs) pulls a ton more women than being tall. However there are diminishing returns as the high earning athletes (NBA, NFL, NHL, influencers) pull even more.

Moo G wrote:

Unless he is crypto billionaire, highly unlikely. There is nothing more unsightly then a taller woman putting her arms around a shorter man's shoulders. I am not saying this because I am tall. I'm only 5'8.

You are an idiot. You are taller than over half of the men in the western world and still feel like this? Give your head a shake.

OozmaKappa wrote:

Im gonna be generous to the post and say that the argument is supposed to be that there are simply less of the tall men women typically pursue.

Only 20% of the male population is over 6ft tall. It would stand to reason that if you disregard height then you would have an easier time finding a "good" man among the 80% rather than the 20%.

It's not like your options are magically increased if you're 6'0.0" rather than 5'11.9". It's a matter of whether your apperance puts you in the category of "super short" (5'5"-), "short" (5'6"-5'8"), "a bit shorter" (5'9"-5'10"), "average" (5'11"-6'1"), "tall" (6'2"-6'3") or "very tall" (6'4+"). And of course the numbers I just gave are based on U.S.A., not Japan or Netherlands.

If I had to estimate the attractiveness scale with A meaning average, I'd say something like

* super short: 0.01A

* short: 0.05A

* a bit shorter: 0.5A

* average: A

* tall: 1.5A

* very tall: 2.5A

That is, being on the shorter end reduces your options more than being on the taller end increases your options, all other things such as handsomeness being equal.

It's not true that all bets are off if a guy is super wealthy. Jeff Bezos (5'6") may have 10000x as much money as a famous Italian male model pop signer, and they both might have near infinite dating options, but most women would chose the Italian singer nonetheless.

I dont think you understood what I said.

The logic is that if I for instance am convinced my soulmate is a redhead and only pursue redheads, then that is a huge constraint on my dating pool. If you filter out the majority of your options based on criteria that only a small minority of the population can fit, then you will have a much harder time finding a good match.

Being in a position of respect and influence is subconsioucly associated with being tall in height. That's why being taller makes it easier to be elected President, for example, and why seeing a famous person in real life for the first time often is a shock at them being shorter than in the picture you had painted in your head. If you start to type in any famous male's name into a search engine then the suggested searches as you type will always include the name plus "height" because that's maybe the attribute people are most curious about (not weight, IQ, etc.) in forming an impression about the guy.

The associtation we've all heard before about height is to men as weight is to women is a valid one. If two women are talking and one tells the other that she knows a good guy she could set her up with, we know the other is going to ask how tall is the guy, same how a guy will want to get an idea of the woman's weight or general figure before deciding that he would be open to meeting her.

OozmaKappa wrote:

I dont think you understood what I said.

The logic is that if I for instance am convinced my soulmate is a redhead and only pursue redheads, then that is a huge constraint on my dating pool. If you filter out the majority of your options based on criteria that only a small minority of the population can fit, then you will have a much harder time finding a good match.

What are you talking about? Being short is a sexually unattractive trait for men. Filtering out people with unattractive traits (I assume you're speaking about filtering in the literal sense like a setting on a dating app) is exactly what one should do to find a good match.