Meat saves lives wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
Funny what you can "prove" by just making sh!t up.
.
.
.
Well, you get the picture. Japan ranks around 75th in meat consumption and the average Japanese consumes well under half of what the average American does.
But I do like your style. It really is quite remarkable what you can demonstrate by simply lying out your ass.
Wrong.
https://www.carnivoreisvegan.com/hong-kong-long-life-eat-meat/I suppose that you think seafood is a "vegetable" and not a form of meat? Doesn't matter, most of HK's animal food consumption is from pork and beef.
More inconvenient facts for plant-based idjots:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27680091/"The most significant dietary correlate of low CVD risk was high total fat and animal protein consumption. "
Wow, talk about doubling down on dumb!
Nobody claims that fish consumption is unhealthy. Indeed, "the typically bull$hit western medicine 'health' narrative" that you are trying to show is in fact bull$hit strongly endorses significant consumption of fish and lower consumption of red meat. By putting these (fish and red meat) in the same category you are:
a) Showing how incredibly stup!d you are
b) Demonstrating your ignorance
c) Making it obvious that you have zero integrity
d) All of the above
Do tell us which is the correct answer.