Grace Kelly wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You really don't get it. The top of the sport is rife with doping. And you think a clean athlete can run faster than Flojo. You're a naive simpleton.
They all using performance enhancers. Every top runner since the late 70's. So, with that in mind, why does that diminish what Elaine has done?
It diminishes what they all have done. To be "the best cheat amongst cheats" - what a distinction!
Armstronglivs wrote:
Grace Kelly wrote:
They all using performance enhancers. Every top runner since the late 70's. So, with that in mind, why does that diminish what Elaine has done?
It diminishes what they all have done. To be "the best cheat amongst cheats" - what a distinction!
Hypothetically, if using PEDs was publicly allowed (I say publicly because everybody working with or near these high level athletes knows they cheat including the governing bodies), does that change the narrative?
Elaine Thompson got the title of female Athlete of the year.
The number of Olympic Gold medals and the difficulty 100m times played for her.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Grace Kelly wrote:
They all using performance enhancers. Every top runner since the late 70's. So, with that in mind, why does that diminish what Elaine has done?
It diminishes what they all have done. To be "the best cheat amongst cheats" - what a distinction!
Who do you think is the best clean female sprinter right now? And why.
Natural wrote:
jumpers knee wrote:
Double Olympic win
10.61 into a headwind, with a good wind she can beat the wind aided 10.49 wr
she is now the national and Olympic record holder.
Anyone here thinking it's done natural?
Come on man, who really gives a damn, this is world class sprinting, ok?
Ya are talking just the ladies, right?