Bekele Fan wrote:
Bekele vs Wariner over 400m would be a better race. If you took away the starting blocks to rempve the small explosive element of the 400m start then I would say that Bekele would take it by about 3 or 4m.
stop talking
Bekele Fan wrote:
Bekele vs Wariner over 400m would be a better race. If you took away the starting blocks to rempve the small explosive element of the 400m start then I would say that Bekele would take it by about 3 or 4m.
stop talking
Has Wariner ever run an 800? For all we know, he could be a 1:40 800 runner. Just because he is fast for the 400 does not mean he is slow at anything longer.
hahahha
Let me be the first to inform you.
HE IS NOT A 1:40 guy.
Why? Well because nobody in the history of mankind has been. The best in the world right now are 142.5 at their best. 2.5 seconds is a LONG way
Felix or Bekele over 200m?
got to go with Felix, although that is a great matchup. Bekele has her at 300M by a bit though in my expert analysis.
webby wrote:
Felix or Bekele over 200m?
Felix of course.
Infact if we factored in Muna Lee in the race, Bekele would get the bronze. Yup!
How about Radcliffe vs Wariner at 1000m? No, really.
Skuj wrote:
How about Radcliffe vs Wariner at 1000m? No, really.
No, not really. Wariner would win by 150 meters. Take a look at him when he rolls through a 400 in 45- he's not even tired! If he rolled through in 52 he might get bored, take a nap, wake up, run and still beat Radcliffe.
Bekele takes Wariner over 400 meters.
Doubtful? Here's how it happened.
We secretly placed naked obese white women with bad hair dye jobs every 25 meters on lanes one through four. Wariner being heavily influenced by his home boys would think "Oh snap just look at them phat babes just ripe for the pickin" and loses two to four seconds. Bekele would think "This is the most bizzar cross country race I've ever been in" and powers away to victory.
great post habman!