Is it now official that their is a conspiracy against the Mavericks?

If there was ever a conspiracy by the refs and the officials, it was against the Sacramento Kings in 2002-03. The Kings were robbed! They were mugged by the referees (Baveta/crawford) or whatever their names were. A slight touch on Shaq by Divac was called as a foul and the Lakers would go to the shooting line.

I did watch tonight's gamebetween the Spurs (my team) and the Mavs. They were simply outplayed by George Hill, Parker, Ginobili and everyone else.

I don't know if there is a conspiracy, but the officials are some of the poorest the league has ever had. I just saw mello flatten a guy while throwing his arm out pushing the guy to the floor as he was making a shot and the call was a block. Lebron the other night had Deng jump into him with his feet moving and a charge was called taking the basket away from lebron. Very inconsistent from all the officials.

Last night, a turnover was called on Kobe Klanker. The only two things that could have been called were a travel or a jump ball. After the lakers whined around, the refs decided to say it was an inadvertant whistle and gave the ball to the Lakers. Of course that call didn't matter as the pathetic lakers got slaughtered. It was a good thing they were at Okie or they would have had to get a zamboni to clean the floor of all the garbage the faker fanatics would have been throwing on the floor.

Really no point watching the NBA anymore. I guarantee the Cleveland Cavs will win this year. They let Lebron do ANYTHING. I saw him charge at least 12 times in a single game earlier this year. How many fouls did they call against him. 0.

Meanwhile if anyone so much as breathes on him TWEEET! FOUL!

Watch something else folks the CAVS are the 2010 NBA Champs. Now worship Lebron and buy whatever he is endorsing!

Mavs are chokers, bottom line. Dirk can't win games plain and simple. He's not that kind of superstar. Plus, with Rick Carlisle at the helm? Not exactly a recipe for a title run.

I'll stop now before I jinx the Spurs (who I don't really support since they beat the Knicks back in 99).

raytodd wrote:

Mavs are chokers, bottom line. Dirk can't win games plain and simple. He's not that kind of superstar. Plus, with Rick Carlisle at the helm? Not exactly a recipe for a title run.

I'll stop now before I jinx the Spurs (who I don't really support since they beat the Knicks back in 99).

dirk cant win games?

there have been 2 superstars to get their teams to the finals without the help of at least 1 other superstars...lebron and dirk

Is it now official that 'their' is a conspiracy against the Mavericks?

'there' not 'their'

I think the "conspiracy" is that the NBA suits don't want a hack team (i.e., Mavericks) advancing deep into the playoffs.

They were up 14 Sunday night and then missed about ten shots in a row to finish the third quarter. Either the refs put an invisible lid on the basket or they are chokers. (I had the Mavs plus two and a half for a loser)

Don't worry, though. Mark Cuban will save the day!!!

The Mavericks have never won a title because Dirk is thier best player. I like Dirk, and I like the Mavs too, but I just don't think they will win it all with Dirk as thier numebr one.

If you want to watch a real conspiracy watch what happens when Orlando plays Cleveland.

You heard it here first.

Come on dude. You're really complaining about D-Wade getting sent to the line 25 times? Back in 2006 there were 3 superstars, Lebron, Kobe, and Wade. Get over it he was amazing in that series and that whole season. Just watch the 2005 Christmas game against the Lakers

hopless mavs fan wrote:

It makes sense too. There have been 3 teams ever to win 50+ games 10+ years in a row: The spurs, the lakers (in the 80s) and the mavs.

Over that period, the mavericks have 0 championships. the spurs/lakers each have/had 4.

Yes but also over that time, the Lakers and Spurs have always been the better teams. Both in general and in the clutch.

The reason that the Mavericks do not have a championship is that they are not good enough.

whine for my team wrote:

hopless mavs fan wrote:

It makes sense too. There have been 3 teams ever to win 50+ games 10+ years in a row: The spurs, the lakers (in the 80s) and the mavs.

Over that period, the mavericks have 0 championships. the spurs/lakers each have/had 4.

Yes but also over that time, the Lakers and Spurs have always been the better teams. Both in general and in the clutch.

The reason that the Mavericks do not have a championship is that they are not good enough.

Yesterday, rookie DeJaun Blair played less than a quarter and had 5 offensive rebounds, more than anyone on either team. And the guy is only 6' 5"???? The Mavs, led by Dirk, are soft.