Are Mila Kunis and Anne Hathaway in the same league?

Mila Kunis is the better looking actress while Anne Hathaway is the better actress. Hathaway is the one out of these two that is most likely going to receive an Oscar.

Jacks lost wrote:

Umm, yeah, you aren't a woman so you don't get a vote on how that impacts women because you don't know. To be honest, I think you are the one who has body image issues.

Suit yourself. Meanwhile, guys will chose a lady who is well proportioned (slim waist, nice stomach, etc.) over a lady who doesn't take care of herself. Further, if you don't keep yourself trim, then you're out of the evolutionary contest. Asian ladies take care of themselves and therefore are well proportioned. That's why guys are going Asian.

letwsh wrote:

There is no way a man can understand what it feels like to be constantly compared to airbrushed models by everyone.

Yes, there is. I have plenty of airbrushed guy friends who go to Penn State. They're in my fraternity and they attract women with incredible exactitude. Care to disagree?

I said wow wrote:

There is that movie where Hathaway is a sex addict or whatever. I have never seen the whole thing, but it shows her tits a lot.

Anyway, that was when I decided that I didn't like her. I am not sure what it is - because I love titties - but something about her is just not sexually attractive.

Kunis, on the other hand, isn't the hottest girl in the world, but damn if she isn't sexy.

Now, for pure, raw sex appeal, nothing beats this girl:

http://i.imgur.com/HUth7.jpg

I love what makeup and Photoshop artists can do to Miss Johansson, but that photo is heavily doctored. She has a lot of natural beauty, I don't see the point in altering it so much.

Look at the left boob in that photo and compare it to the right. Whoever did the touchup focused on making the cleavage look firm and tight but somehow made the left boob way out of proportion.

And her face is not that narrow. She has extremely round cheeks, which is one of her naturally attractive features, but also one of the things that makes her look more "normal." And obviously there was a lot of air brushing to remove skin blemishes, but that's to be expected.

Compare it to this:

As far as Anne Hathaway goes? Bleh. Gives me the heebee jeebies. Her face is freakishly out of proportion, which is why she looks good on screen. But that mouth gives me nightmares. And her eyes are weird. I give her face a 6/10.

Hathaway is in a weird category with Natalie Portman - when they get it right, they are incredible, way beyond a girl like Kunis.

But there are some pictures of them that seem to be of different people. Lots of makeup and excellent lighting do some great work.

Yeah they are in the same league. Out of mine!!

http://images.starpulse.com/news/bloggers/10/blog_images/mila-kunis-32.jpg

http://cdn02.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/hathaway-globes/anne-hathaway-golden-globes-2011-05.jpg

CVS stock room boy wrote:

Kunis is hotter but a chain smoker. And if you were doing her you'd think it was Meg from family guy.

I just got a chub.

Don't you dare put anyone in Portman's league, especially Hathaway. But...I do get what you're saying. But after v for vendetta I came to the conclusion that Portman is without a doubt one of the most beautiful people on the planet. Anyone that looks that good bald is doing something right.

Go for it. Go Asian. I don't care about any guy who is looking for a woman who is well-proportioned. One of my favorite compliments I've ever received was from a guy who was an art major. He said my face was beautifully asymmetrical; that my imperfections were put together in such a way that made my face uniquely beautiful.

d2rep wrote:

Don't you dare put anyone in Portman's league, especially Hathaway. But...I do get what you're saying. But after v for vendetta I came to the conclusion that Portman is without a doubt one of the most beautiful people on the planet. Anyone that looks that good bald is doing something right.

Portman no makeup

portman makeup

hard to believe

the league of women you probably shouldn't give a shit about?

newfound respect for anne though after latest batman flick.

newfound disrespect for mila after the ashton news.

anne doesnt look too good here http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/05/article-0-119E8F65000005DC-870_306x352.jpg

Anne Hathaway could go into a coffee shop without any makeup or her hair brushed and get asked out. In fact, when she dresses down is probably the time when she gets asked out the most.

Mila Kunis has the body of a twelve year old, solid facial structure and prett eyes but wears a lot of makeup.

Anne Hathaway has a better body, large eyes, and big smile, although her mouth reminds me of julia roberts who i do not find attractive. Also super pale, although that is not necessarily a downside.

Marion Cotillard was more attractive in Batman in my opinion.

Like Rebecca Romijin, Mila Kunis is Eurasian. Yummy Ymmmy Yummy.

I actually thought Hathaway was the best thing in the Batman movie, which I thought was generally loathsome.

What is Hathaway's real last name ? Must be Hungarian, Iranian, Turkish, Czech, or Israeli with her Eurasian looks.

Helluva Runner wrote:

Marion Cotillard was more attractive in Batman in my opinion.

I agree. Cotillard is way hotter than either of these other two.

Not in the same league.

One has the body of a young boy and the other has a body of a woman.