Altra Escalante Racer

Overall Grades And Reviews

8.9 Overall Grade
21 reviews

A zero drop old school racing flat that gets great reviews and has been around for years.

How This Shoe Compares To Its Competitors

Overall Rating among all reviewed shoes you can buy:

Price Information

Buy This Shoe

Select men or women above.
$140 $97
Paris

LetsRun.com Reviewer Ratings

Shoe Comparison

Shoe comparison
Altra Escalante Racer
Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next% 3
HOKA ONE ONE Cielo Road
Brooks Hyperion Elite 3
Image
Altra Escalante Racer
This Shoe
Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next% 3
Top Rated Supershoe For Sale
HOKA ONE ONE Cielo Road
Equally Comfortable Racing Flat For Sale (tied with this shoe)
Brooks Hyperion Elite 3
Most Durable Supershoe For Sale
Shoe Properties
Shoe Type
Racing Flat
Supershoe, Racing Flat
Racing Flat
Supershoe, Racing Flat
Pronation Control
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
7.4 oz. (men's), 6.4 oz. (women's)
7.1 oz. (men's), 5.8 oz. (women's)
7.1 oz. (men's), 7.1 oz. (women's)
7.9 oz. (men's), 7.9 oz. (women's)
Stack Height
24mm.
38mm.
33mm.
35mm.
Forefoot Height
24mm.
30mm.
30mm.
27mm.
Drop Height
8 mm.
3 mm.
8 mm.
Upper material
Engineered Knit Mesh, Heel Counter, PFS Performance Last
FlyKnit
Shoe Released
Q1 2018
Q2 2023
Q2 2023
Q2 2023
MSRP
$140
$250
$250
LRC Ratings
Out of 10
Overall
8.9
9.4
8.9
8.7
Comfort
9.0
8.9
9.0
8.9
Cushioning
8.3
9.2
9.3
9.1
Durability
7.8
6.9
8.3
8.2
Appearance
8.4
8.8
8.5
8.4
Value
7.5
7.5
8.6
8.0

Reader Reviews

  • LRC Editor's Choice

    Solid race shoe.

    20 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    7.0
    Comfort
    7.0
    Cushioning
    3.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    8.0

    The Altra Escalante Racer is a good lightweight race shoe for the 1/2 marathon and marathon distances.  They may take some getting used to if you haven't used a zero drop shoe before.  Surprisingly durable with the stitched upper, I've had several pairs in which the upper is like new even after running over 1,000 miles in.  I prefer to use them in a  rotation with other heavier shoes and they work nicely for speed workouts and tempo days in addition to longer races.  

  • LRC Editor's Choice

    Quick comparison to Escalante 1/1.5

    55 miles per week, overpronator, low arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    8.0
    Cushioning
    7.0
    Durability
    7.0
    Appearance
    9.0
    Value
    5.0

    Just got a pair of these in because I couldn't find Escalante 1 or 1.5 discounted low enough to where I'd buy them. (I'm a cheap ass and think more than $70 for a pair or running shoes expected to last < 1000 miles is too much.)

    My biggest concern was that the Racer version would be too uncomfortable on the roads here in Colorado, but new out of box, I'd say the cushioning experience is similar to The One 2.5, which used to be my favorite shoe; in other words, not quite as cush as the Escalante but still very comfortable.

    Otherwise, it feels identical to my Escalante 1 and 1.5. Neutral and light. Note that they probably shaved most weight from the upper. It is no good at all for winter here, but could be quite welcome in the summer heat or in race conditions. Recommended. By the way--I'm 5'5" 120 pounds. Your durability and value ratings would likely vary based on your own size and willingness to pay for shoes.

  • Altra escalante racer

    80 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    10.0

    Wide toe box, low stack height & just enough cushion allows for a good proprioception on landing, contributes to healthy running  

  • Light zero drop shoe

    40 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    5.0
    Appearance
    9.0
    Value
    9.0

    Overall a pretty well made shoe with a little difficulty with hot spots around the laces. I found that they worked well but the bottom of the shoe gave out quickly.

  • A true modern day flat

    50 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    8.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    8.0

    A great shoes for those looking to add something more minimalist. Can do anything from normal runs to workouts. 

  • Great minimal racers

    Neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    7.0
    Durability
    6.0
    Appearance
    6.0
    Value
    6.0

    Grat for any paces, flexible, great transitioń and ride. Wide and comfy in forefoot area! Standard durability of midsole and outsole apprx 600 km for me.

  • Great cushioning, just not for long!

    25 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    5.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    7.0

    These were my first shoes with any cushioning after running over 1000 miles in Vibrams. At first, these were great in rotation, with bouncy cushioning and felt ready for speed.

    Bought in size EU 44, which is my usual goto size (I find EU sizes more reliable for some reason). The size and the toebox are great and they are very easy to slip into.

    I used these to break my 5K PR 25 flat, down to 21:15, my 10K PR from 50 flat to 45 flat. Then finally crushed my half marathon time from 2:13 to 1:43. I strained my calf after going too hard too close to my half effort, so it wasn't the fault of these shoes!

    Then a few months later after 400km they just started to feel "hard" and I had to work even for an easy pace. I started to notice the initial signs of Plantar Fasciitis but managed it with rolling. Shortly after I bought the Hoka Carbon X and the pain went away and I noticed running was easy again. I tried these again recently and even my Merrell Vapor Glove 3D felt like it had more spring (which makes no sense as it has no cushioning). So I can only assume I killed the foam after only 400km. Mind you, 95% of my running is on roads and concrete, so maybe I was hard on these guys!

    I do love these shoes if I could get them cheaper (in Japan they are very expensive) I would get them again.

    The main reason I'd pick the Vibrams over these is durability and price. My original Vibrams were half the price and lasted 1600km before retirement, whilst my second pair are fine after 500km.

  • Altra Escalante Racer Review

    40 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    8.0
    Durability
    5.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    8.0

    Been through two pairs- Boston and 4th of July

    Cons:

    -Soles wear out fast

    -No grip while running on moist asphalt

    -Not responsive; no snap; feel dead; cushion is non responsive

    Pros:

    -Perfect toe-box

    -ZERO DROP

    -Recovery run shoe

    -Light

    -Breathable

  • Great medium time shoe

    50 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    8.0
    Durability
    8.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    7.0

    I really love the racers. They have a great road feel. After about 2 hours I start to feel it a bit so I limit them to half marathon-30k distance (or a marathon if I ever make it to the sub 2:45 mark)

  • What the Escalante should be

    50 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    7.0
    Value
    5.0

    This shoe is firmer, has more energy return and is lighter than the current Escalante's. This shoe is everything the Escalante should be plain and simple. If you like the Escalante you will love the Racer version.