Check out Keshel's presentation from last month. He covers bellwether states and bellwether counties which had a perfect record in forecasting presidential elections until 2020. Statistical impossibilities all over the country and specific counties are pointed out.
Now that Trump is out of office, Sean Hannity has been going hard at President Biden, but the truth is, he has been speaking in signals and sending very clev...
The democrats have no god in their party that they completely worship and follow like sheeple. Trump is the Republican god and if they don't pay homage to him they pay significant consequences. It doesn't matter what foolish or dangerous lies he tells they march to his orders. They seen to enjoy or even relish their subservience to him.
Democrats are much more independent. They will make up their own minds about issues. They can disagree and argue. Its so much healthier and better for democracy to have an independent minded party in charge. Sure democrats can be partisan but they are not and have never been under the power of one autocratic authority.
It is very sad what has happened to Republicans. I think there are some who quietly feel shame about it. As they should.
The democrats have no god in their party that they completely worship and follow like sheeple. Trump is the Republican god and if they don't pay homage to him they pay significant consequences. It doesn't matter what foolish or dangerous lies he tells they march to his orders. They seen to enjoy or even relish their subservience to him.
Democrats are much more independent. They will make up their own minds about issues. They can disagree and argue. Its so much healthier and better for democracy to have an independent minded party in charge. Sure democrats can be partisan but they are not and have never been under the power of one autocratic authority.
It is very sad what has happened to Republicans. I think there are some who quietly feel shame about it. As they should.
The downside of not having a Trumplike god to worship is its harder to get everyone to follow lockstep on presidential decisions, its harder to have everyone parrot talking points in unison to make them stick and it might be harder to command party members to go out and vote.
Check out Keshel's presentation from last month. He covers bellwether states and bellwether counties which had a perfect record in forecasting presidential elections until 2020. Statistical impossibilities all over the country and specific counties are pointed out.
Bellwethers are bellwethers until they are not. This happens in every election. Demographic shifts happen. Voting patterns are always changing.
Also, the 2020 election was unique in a couple of ways.
First, Trump is probably the most polarizing candidate in our history. He motivated a lot of people to vote who normally wouldn't.
Second, the rise of mail-in ballots changed the whole game. When you make it easier to vote, Democrats do better.
None of that means the election was fraudulent. It was just different.
Absent any evidence that can stand up in court, massive election fraud is the least likely explanation for Biden's victory. Plus, there is the thing about how humans are really bad at keeping secrets. If the presidential election was won by a massive fraud, somebody would have spilled the beans by now. The smoking gun would be found.
So Gary, how long will you wait for the smoking gun before you decide that maybe the fraud didn't happen? Will you be like Adult and say that you will never stop believing no matter what?
The democrats have no god in their party that they completely worship and follow like sheeple. Trump is the Republican god and if they don't pay homage to him they pay significant consequences. It doesn't matter what foolish or dangerous lies he tells they march to his orders. They seen to enjoy or even relish their subservience to him.
Democrats are much more independent. They will make up their own minds about issues. They can disagree and argue. Its so much healthier and better for democracy to have an independent minded party in charge. Sure democrats can be partisan but they are not and have never been under the power of one autocratic authority.
It is very sad what has happened to Republicans. I think there are some who quietly feel shame about it. As they should.
About the number feeling shame, apparently the number is quite low. And regardless, quite shame won't save the party (or the country). Quite shame is what gets Cheney and Kinzinger out on a very isolated island, with no change in sight.
Check out Keshel's presentation from last month. He covers bellwether states and bellwether counties which had a perfect record in forecasting presidential elections until 2020. Statistical impossibilities all over the country and specific counties are pointed out.
Bellwethers are bellwethers until they are not. This happens in every election. Demographic shifts happen. Voting patterns are always changing.
Also, the 2020 election was unique in a couple of ways.
First, Trump is probably the most polarizing candidate in our history. He motivated a lot of people to vote who normally wouldn't.
SECOND, THE RISE OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS CHANGED THE WHOLE GAME. WHEN YOU MAKE IT EASIER TO COMMIT FRAUD, DEMOCRATS DO BETTER.
None of that means the election was fraudulent. It was just different.
Absent any evidence that can stand up in court, massive election fraud is the least likely explanation for Biden's victory. Plus, there is the thing about how humans are really bad at keeping secrets. If the presidential election was won by a massive fraud, somebody would have spilled the beans by now. The smoking gun would be found.
So Gary, how long will you wait for the smoking gun before you decide that maybe the fraud didn't happen? Will you be like Adult and say that you will never stop believing no matter what?
Bellwethers are bellwethers until they are not. This happens in every election. Demographic shifts happen. Voting patterns are always changing.
Also, the 2020 election was unique in a couple of ways.
First, Trump is probably the most polarizing candidate in our history. He motivated a lot of people to vote who normally wouldn't.
SECOND, THE RISE OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS CHANGED THE WHOLE GAME. WHEN YOU MAKE IT EASIER TO COMMIT FRAUD, DEMOCRATS DO BETTER.
None of that means the election was fraudulent. It was just different.
Absent any evidence that can stand up in court, massive election fraud is the least likely explanation for Biden's victory. Plus, there is the thing about how humans are really bad at keeping secrets. If the presidential election was won by a massive fraud, somebody would have spilled the beans by now. The smoking gun would be found.
So Gary, how long will you wait for the smoking gun before you decide that maybe the fraud didn't happen? Will you be like Adult and say that you will never stop believing no matter what?
So how was the fraud actually committed? How did the fraudsters get around the built-in safeguards? Who perpetrated the fraud in each state? Why hasn't anyone uncovered hard evidence that will stand up in court?
So how was the fraud actually committed? How did the fraudsters get around the built-in safeguards? Who perpetrated the fraud in each state? Why hasn't anyone uncovered hard evidence that will stand up in court?
Would you agree that state-issued IDs should be required to vote? Blacks and hispanic citizens are three times more likely to not have the correct ID to vote. Why is that?
So how was the fraud actually committed? How did the fraudsters get around the built-in safeguards? Who perpetrated the fraud in each state? Why hasn't anyone uncovered hard evidence that will stand up in court?
Would you agree that state-issued IDs should be required to vote? Blacks and hispanic citizens are three times more likely to not have the correct ID to vote. Why is that?
State-issued IDs only matter to combat in-person voter fraud. If in-person voter fraud was a problem that IDs could solve, then we should require them. But nobody has shown that in-person voter fraud is a problem.
The goal should be to come up with a voting system that is both easy and secure. Everyone should have equal access to the ballot box. So we should not make it harder for one group of people to vote.
State-issued IDs make it harder for certain segments of the population to vote. So they should not be used unless absolutely necessary. You need a balance between security and ease of access.
Check out Keshel's presentation from last month. He covers bellwether states and bellwether counties which had a perfect record in forecasting presidential elections until 2020. Statistical impossibilities all over the country and specific counties are pointed out.
Would you agree that state-issued IDs should be required to vote? Blacks and hispanic citizens are three times more likely to not have the correct ID to vote. Why is that?
State-issued IDs only matter to combat in-person voter fraud. If in-person voter fraud was a problem that IDs could solve, then we should require them. But nobody has shown that in-person voter fraud is a problem.
The goal should be to come up with a voting system that is both easy and secure. Everyone should have equal access to the ballot box. So we should not make it harder for one group of people to vote.
State-issued IDs make it harder for certain segments of the population to vote. So they should not be used unless absolutely necessary. You need a balance between security and ease of access.
How can you function in society today without an Id?
State-issued IDs only matter to combat in-person voter fraud. If in-person voter fraud was a problem that IDs could solve, then we should require them. But nobody has shown that in-person voter fraud is a problem.
The goal should be to come up with a voting system that is both easy and secure. Everyone should have equal access to the ballot box. So we should not make it harder for one group of people to vote.
State-issued IDs make it harder for certain segments of the population to vote. So they should not be used unless absolutely necessary. You need a balance between security and ease of access.
How can you function in society today without an Id?
You need an state-issued Id to:
Buy alochol
Buy cigarettes
Open bank account
Fly on a plane
Rent hotel room
Apply for food stamps
Apply for welfare
Apply for unemployment
Apply for medicaid/Soc Sec.
Apply for a job
Buy a house
Drive a car
Rent a car
Buy a pet
Purchase a gun
Buy a cell phone
buy fishing license
Visit a casino
Pick up prescription
But not to vote???
None of those are a right. And no, you don't even need an ID to purchase a gun in many states. To require an ID that you know many eligible voters won't have is to restrict their Constitutional right.
How can you function in society today without an Id?
You need an state-issued Id to:
Buy alochol
Buy cigarettes
Open bank account
Fly on a plane
Rent hotel room
Apply for food stamps
Apply for welfare
Apply for unemployment
Apply for medicaid/Soc Sec.
Apply for a job
Buy a house
Drive a car
Rent a car
Buy a pet
Purchase a gun
Buy a cell phone
buy fishing license
Visit a casino
Pick up prescription
But not to vote???
None of those are a right. And no, you don't even need an ID to purchase a gun in many states. To require an ID that you know many eligible voters won't have is to restrict their Constitutional right.
So how was the fraud actually committed? How did the fraudsters get around the built-in safeguards? Who perpetrated the fraud in each state? Why hasn't anyone uncovered hard evidence that will stand up in court?
What safe guards? The voter roles are filled with THOUSANDS of non-existent voters. Mail in ballots are not verified... If it's signed it counts. In Arizona they found some that were counted despite not being signed at all...
How can you function in society today without an Id?
You need an state-issued Id to:
Buy alochol
Buy cigarettes
Open bank account
Fly on a plane
Rent hotel room
Apply for food stamps
Apply for welfare
Apply for unemployment
Apply for medicaid/Soc Sec.
Apply for a job
Buy a house
Drive a car
Rent a car
Buy a pet
Purchase a gun
Buy a cell phone
buy fishing license
Visit a casino
Pick up prescription
But not to vote???
None of those are a right. And no, you don't even need an ID to purchase a gun in many states. To require an ID that you know many eligible voters won't have is to restrict their Constitutional right.
There is no right to vote in the original constitution. Nowhere in the text does it explicitly say that citizens have the right to vote in elections. Instead, it merely states that anyone eligible to vote for the largest house of a state’s legislature is also eligible to vote for members of the House of Representatives from that state. As a result, states were left with the power to decide who qualified to vote, leading to considerable variation in the nation’s early years.
None of those are a right. And no, you don't even need an ID to purchase a gun in many states. To require an ID that you know many eligible voters won't have is to restrict their Constitutional right.
There is no right to vote in the original constitution. Nowhere in the text does it explicitly say that citizens have the right to vote in elections. Instead, it merely states that anyone eligible to vote for the largest house of a state’s legislature is also eligible to vote for members of the House of Representatives from that state. As a result, states were left with the power to decide who qualified to vote, leading to considerable variation in the nation’s early years.
Are you saying that constitutional amendments are part of the constitution?