Is there any clean athlete? Please name one

i think hes doping too,but on what,i dont know.probably not hard core steroids,but low doses of something.and yes olympic truth i believe you went to the olympics,and ran a 10.3 pb.its totally conceivable,especially if you came from another country that doesnt have a lot of super quick sprinters.you ran a b qualifier and that got you there.

Willis is clean wrote:

Nick Willis is clean.

Centro. Rupp. Which drives the jealous punks here crazy.

Willis. Makhloufi LOL. He was tested so much in comparison to Kiprop who has NEVER BEEN TESTED OUT OF SEASON. EVER. And Kiprop did nothing but complain about being intimidated by all the talk of new tests.

Jager. Simpson. Chelimo.

A honest question wrote:

I've got two questions,

The first is if everyone is doping than why are we worried about it? Basically from reading through even highschoolers are, so there's no way that we could ever stop doping completely, so why are we talking about anyone being clean and worrying?

And two, what makes you think everyone that questions you here is jealous of your looks, or jealous that you ran in the Olympics with highschool times, or why do you think distance runners a are jealous of your 100 times?

HOnest answer 1. Iagree 2. I don't. no one knows who I am or what i look like.I ran a 10.39 was a good legit time, would have made the team for several countries and the finals for Canada, Jamaica, England.Japan, Brazil etc in 1996. I ran it 95 .

According to his story wrote:

He ran 10.77 in 1992 lol I thought you were doing 10.3-.4-.5s

I highly doubt people were thinking a guy running women's times was doping lmao

Not sure thats correct. Could be I was running around that in 92 10.3 in 95 and 10.4/10.5 2000

Olympic Truth wrote:

According to his story wrote:

He ran 10.77 in 1992 lol I thought you were doing 10.3-.4-.5s

I highly doubt people were thinking a guy running women's times was doping lmao

Not sure thats correct. Could be I was running around that in 92 10.3 in 95 and 10.4/10.5 2000

I looked it up and I could not find a 10.77 for me in 92. I ran the 400 more in the early 90s. Where did I run that? I know most of my meets. I was yooung in 92. But I think I was running a bit faster than that. maybe 10.67, in one of the big LA meets.

Many of the people who have actually given their name and were good are very respected on this board

So if its MANY name 3 please

Paula Radcliffe of course, certified by the tough anti-doping IAAF President Lord Coe.

Try to keep up!

Also Gatlin (now).

rekrunnr wrote:

Paula Radcliffe of course, certified by the tough anti-doping IAAF President Lord Coe.

Try to keep up!

Also Gatlin (now).

The easiest test to beat IAAF. Same one Lance and Marion beat 100s of times. Come on putting a Lord in front of his name doesn't do anything. If you are giving Gatlin a pass, "now" that he is "clean" and actually running faster than when he was on drugs. I think you are not keeping up. They are both VERY DIRTY.

Galen Rupp

Not sure what your point is? They have good distance running experience for themselves and ........ And so..... I am horrible or I am not good at running a mile or something negative about me because they are awesome??? Or you were just saying???

Let me explain wrote:

Galen Rupp

I used to think he was clean. But his coach had the whole documentary and it looked shady. Are you just ignoring that and saying HE'S CLEAN. Thats fine, but they easy for me to say HE'S DIRTY.

Olympic Truth wrote:

Not sure what your point is? They have good distance running experience for themselves and ........ And so..... I am horrible or I am not good at running a mile or something negative about me because they are awesome??? Or you were just saying???

The point was that you were questioning why anyone would reveal themselves on here. If you were in the Olympics, people wouldn't hate on you if you ever did reveal yourself.

Idontreallyknow wrote:

Olympic Truth wrote:

Not sure what your point is? They have good distance running experience for themselves and ........ And so..... I am horrible or I am not good at running a mile or something negative about me because they are awesome??? Or you were just saying???

The point was that you were questioning why anyone would reveal themselves on here. If you were in the Olympics, people wouldn't hate on you if you ever did reveal yourself.

OK. But none of them went to the Olympics and if they did, with sub times this board would go after them. So and so ran faster blah blah blah. They are doing it to CENTRO. But he won. I got killed.

So why would I do that? Just because a few people who didn't go to the Olys did?

Ella Nelson

bsf wrote:

Ella Nelson

I think she is clean. Good call.

Olympic Truth wrote:

Sopwith Camel wrote:

All this talk about elite athletes being dirty, and

Well it's just talk.

That's the point of the thread. Have a discussion to get a better understanding of track in general

What discussion?

Sopwith Camel wrote:

Olympic Truth wrote:

That's the point of the thread. Have a discussion to get a better understanding of track in general

What discussion?

The 200 posts and the fact that I think 3-4 of the athletes mentioned are clean and others I don't and there was a back and forth..... discussion.Even others had a discussion about EPO and the Kenyan runners.

I think your question is just meant to discredit the thread for no reason. BYE FELICIA

she doesnt look like shes on peds.still looks female,no acne,no adams apple,no unusual jaw,no muscles on muscles.she isnt ripped.shes just fast.some aussies take peds but many others do not.i dont think morgan mitchell is doped either,and she made the 400 semi.lauren wells,the 400 meter hurdler was a semi finalist,and im pretty sure shes clean.