If you consolidate all of my anonymous names id be easily 1,2,3 and proud of it because what this naturally means is all of my points of view have been spot on. Let's be real nobody wants to agree with facts they want to disagree with them. Think of it this way if you play the lottery and you purchased $10,000 worth of Powerball tickets and won $100 bucks back winning a negative profit of 90% but your best friend buys 1 ticket and wins $1.5 billion are you honesty going to be thrilled for him? No your going to down vote him in life behind his back. Jealousy and envy are real things in life and sadly they are out of our control. When people make solid raw points people will naturally disagree they want to believe everything in life is honest and pure when that is only 10% of the surface.
Three tips:
Avoid run-on sentences.
Feel free to use a paragraph break now and then.
Don't speak for others. I do want to "agree with facts" and if my friend won 1.5 billion, I would be super happy for him. I would not "downvote him behind his back" out of jealousy and envy.
The world is as "honest and pure" as we make it. If we all only downvoted things that are negative, dishonest, bad, vulgar, and stupid, those things will lose their social capital.
Normal, decent people don't just downvote things "to be a dick." If you do that, you are part of the problem. And if there is one thing that people on this board seem to agree with, it is the fact that we could be better if there were fewer trolls and morans.
If you consolidate all of my anonymous names id be easily 1,2,3 and proud of it because what this naturally means is all of my points of view have been spot on. Let's be real nobody wants to agree with facts they want to disagree with them. Think of it this way if you play the lottery and you purchased $10,000 worth of Powerball tickets and won $100 bucks back winning a negative profit of 90% but your best friend buys 1 ticket and wins $1.5 billion are you honesty going to be thrilled for him? No your going to down vote him in life behind his back. Jealousy and envy are real things in life and sadly they are out of our control. When people make solid raw points people will naturally disagree they want to believe everything in life is honest and pure when that is only 10% of the surface.
Three tips:
Avoid run-on sentences.
Feel free to use a paragraph break now and then.
Don't speak for others. I do want to "agree with facts" and if my friend won 1.5 billion, I would be super happy for him. I would not "downvote him behind his back" out of jealousy and envy.
The world is as "honest and pure" as we make it. If we all only downvoted things that are negative, dishonest, bad, vulgar, and stupid, those things will lose their social capital.
Normal, decent people don't just downvote things "to be a dick." If you do that, you are part of the problem. And if there is one thing that people on this board seem to agree with, it is the fact that we could be better if there were fewer trolls and morans.
You confuse the fact that a person may be wrong with lying. If you are wrong are you lying?
I am not confusing anything. I am talking about one specific poster. And he is a known liar. Just see the Arop thread for the most recent one.
Why don't you post under a registered handle Hoady? Oh I remember, because you'd be banned, and also because even you are ashamed of your own racial scientist posts.
That Arop post and your accusation of 'lying' absolutely showcases your modus operandi.
I made one small mistake - that he was 26 last season rather than 25. His birthday is in September, so for practical purposes he was virtually 26 last summer, and will be virtually 27 this summer. Apart from that, my main point was absolutely valid.
And Arop's progression is even more astonishing when you examine it closely. At the end of the 2019 season at age 20, his pb was 1:44.14. At the end of the 2023 season at age 24, his pb was 1:42.85 That itself is quite noteworthy given this season he reduced it to 1:41.20, and many people expected him to break the WR or even go sub 1:40, and still expect him to do so this year, when he will turn 27. But that 1:42.85 was run in the last race of the season just 3 days before his 24th birthday. If he hadn't ran that, his pb would have been 1:43.24 going into 2024 and the age of 24, an improvement of less than one second in four years, or from age 20 to 24, and an improvement of 0.02 seconds in two years, or from age 22 to 24, and then an improvement of two seconds in one season (2024 at 25).
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
You confuse the fact that a person may be wrong with lying. If you are wrong are you lying?
Both you and Coevett are wrong very often.
There sre a viarity of reasons fo tthis:
- bad agenda
- dishonesty
- both of you can't accept when proved to be wrong (you are even worse here)
Being wrong doesn't mean automatically to lie (stupidity etc.). But Coevett lies very often - as you do.
I disagree with you about pretty much everything. That doesn't mean I am lying because I mean what I say - about anything. But disagreement is interpreted as lying by such as yourself because you cannot understand how others do not share your views. That is common here.
He's a good, solid poster but also not incidentally a repeated doping denier. His attitude toward Mo Katir was a good (bad) example.
It's not doping denial to essentially be of the view that someone is innocent until they fail a test. I just don't see how you can enjoy the sport if your default setting is that anyone who performs beyond your expectations is definitely a cheat. I'd just give up and devote my precious free time to something more rewarding.
Katir's perofrmances raised suspicion, as does Chepngetich's WR. You can add others including Hassan and Jakob doing things that no other human has been able to do in terms of producing all-time performances within short timeframes. Then there's Georgia Bell's progression and Kelvin Kiptum arriving from nowhere to blow away the greatest marathoner that ever lived. If your reaction is to just say they're all dopers, or all the ones that you don't personally like are dopers, then it's pointless to follow the sport. Accepting that athletes are competing clean until they fail a test isn't carrying water for dopers, it's just enjoying track and field.
This post was edited 51 seconds after it was posted.
- both of you can't accept when proved to be wrong (you are even worse here)
Being wrong doesn't mean automatically to lie (stupidity etc.). But Coevett lies very often - as you do.
I disagree with you about pretty much everything. That doesn't mean I am lying because I mean what I say - about anything. But disagreement is interpreted as lying by such as yourself because you cannot understand how others do not share your views. That is common here.
It's not about disagreing about something with different possible views (I think some runner will achieve this or that - I don't think that).
You are lying often, for example about what you have written in the past. Or about factual things like number of records etc.
You are a liar. Same like Coevett. With both of you serious discussions sre not possible.
You confuse the fact that a person may be wrong with lying. If you are wrong are you lying?
Both you and Coevett are wrong very often.
There sre a viarity of reasons fo tthis:
- bad agenda
- dishonesty
- both of you can't accept when proved to be wrong (you are even worse here)
Being wrong doesn't mean automatically to lie (stupidity etc.). But Coevett lies very often - as you do.
I don’t think so. From my personal eclectic experiences with Coevett and Armstrongluv, they are trustworthy sort of people, not shady and not criminals. If they ever lied, it was probably just a physiologic reaction of man made elektramagnetico fields from their devices which then appears like a lie. Apart from that they are rather babes!
I disagree with you about pretty much everything. That doesn't mean I am lying because I mean what I say - about anything. But disagreement is interpreted as lying by such as yourself because you cannot understand how others do not share your views. That is common here.
It's not about disagreing about something with different possible views (I think some runner will achieve this or that - I don't think that).
You are lying often, for example about what you have written in the past. Or about factual things like number of records etc.
You are a liar. Same like Coevett. With both of you serious discussions sre not possible.
Again you have never known them gut deep only trousers deep. I know them both from my stomach!
Now how about that? They don’t lie or misrepresent as rekrunner likes to do. You are making things up.
I am not confusing anything. I am talking about one specific poster. And he is a known liar. Just see the Arop thread for the most recent one.
Why don't you post under a registered handle Hoady? Oh I remember, because you'd be banned, and also because even you are ashamed of your own racial scientist posts.
That Arop post and your accusation of 'lying' absolutely showcases your modus operandi.
I made one small mistake - that he was 26 last season rather than 25. His birthday is in September, so for practical purposes he was virtually 26 last summer, and will be virtually 27 this summer. Apart from that, my main point was absolutely valid.
And Arop's progression is even more astonishing when you examine it closely. At the end of the 2019 season at age 20, his pb was 1:44.14. At the end of the 2023 season at age 24, his pb was 1:42.85 That itself is quite noteworthy given this season he reduced it to 1:41.20, and many people expected him to break the WR or even go sub 1:40, and still expect him to do so this year, when he will turn 27. But that 1:42.85 was run in the last race of the season just 3 days before his 24th birthday. If he hadn't ran that, his pb would have been 1:43.24 going into 2024 and the age of 24, an improvement of less than one second in four years, or from age 20 to 24, and an improvement of 0.02 seconds in two years, or from age 22 to 24, and then an improvement of two seconds in one season (2024 at 25).
That’s why Khamis luvs ya Coevett. That’s why! Now I see why.
Great sense of space and time and the laws of human progression and degradation.
your unearthly ability to even point us out the progression. Of Arops 800m performances from <1s to 0.02s to a sudden 2s stunning drop near 25 years old at his oldest and most declined state compared to when he was 20-24?
This is why Arop needs to be doping on a needs basis. The need is there because the space-time intervals dun lie!!
Thoughtsleader would never be as savvy as Coevett luv.
I disagree with you about pretty much everything. That doesn't mean I am lying because I mean what I say - about anything. But disagreement is interpreted as lying by such as yourself because you cannot understand how others do not share your views. That is common here.
It's not about disagreing about something with different possible views (I think some runner will achieve this or that - I don't think that).
You are lying often, for example about what you have written in the past. Or about factual things like number of records etc.
You are a liar. Same like Coevett. With both of you serious discussions sre not possible.
You think anything you don't understand or don't agree with is lying. That is how a simple mind works.
It's not about disagreeing about something with different possible views (I think some runner will achieve this or that - I don't think that).
You are lying often, for example about what you have written in the past. Or about factual things like number of records etc.
You are a liar. Same like Coevett. With both of you serious discussions are not possible.
You think anything you don't understand or don't agree with is lying. That is how a simple mind works.
Again, not about not agreeing. Pure fact that you often have lied about what you have said in the past. Pure fact that you often have lied about factual things.
Not understanding - yeah. Any school boy can understand your childish statements.