What an amazing athlete!! SIfan Hassan 3:53.63 just 4 days after setting 10,000 WR!!!

Pro News/Info/Results Distance
Reply
Moderation
1 9 10
Next
  • registered

    Armstronglivs

    Member since 10/05/2018.

    29,537 posts. Last post 7 hours ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 12:57am EDT
    re: rekrunner

    rekrunner wrote:

    Armstronglivs wrote:

    Finally you admit your arguments are based on assumptions. Baby steps.

    Didn't we establish the assumptions, at the top of this very page (if I post fast)? First, you got my assumptions wrong, despite including them in your quoted post, and I pointed out that they were explicitly stated in the statement you quoted, and we talked about them for a few iterations.

    And earlier you also said I "didn't make" an argument. This was also true -- I laid out the assumptions, and juxtaposed them with 35 years of historical 10000m results. From that, you drew your own conclusion.

    And it can hardly form the basis if the assumptions are contradicted by historical performances, and the conclusion -- your conclusion -- is an apparent contradiction between historical reality and the assumptions.

    Your meaningless self-absorbed waffle never ends.

  • registered

    rekrunner

    Member since 09/27/2015.

    12,623 posts. Last post 1 day ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 2:38am EDT
    re: Armstronglivs

    Armstronglivs wrote:

    Finally you admit your arguments are based on assumptions. Baby steps.

    You seemed to have missed the point. Maybe too many words?

    Let's try again with fewer words. When looking at your statement, and comparing them to previous statements, some by you, just within the last day:

    - "Finally" is wrong

    - "arguments" is wrong

    - "based on" is wrong

    Curiously, this is how you responded to me simply agreeing with your compelling conclusion.

  • registered

    Armstronglivs

    Member since 10/05/2018.

    29,537 posts. Last post 7 hours ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 7:59am EDT
    re: rekrunner

    rekrunner wrote:

    Armstronglivs wrote:

    Finally you admit your arguments are based on assumptions. Baby steps.

    You seemed to have missed the point. Maybe too many words?

    Let's try again with fewer words. When looking at your statement, and comparing them to previous statements, some by you, just within the last day:

    - "Finally" is wrong

    - "arguments" is wrong

    - "based on" is wrong

    Curiously, this is how you responded to me simply agreeing with your compelling conclusion.

    As I said - self-absorbed waffle. Add linguistic drivel to the mix.

  • Noah

    THOUGHTSLEADER

    Member since 06/06/2018.

    12,829 posts. Last post 4 hours ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 10:43am EDT
    re: Armstronglivs

    Just another reminder that Laura Muir runs only 50-60 mpw (including warmups and cooldowns) with a day off every week.

    Elle Purrier runs 80mpw.

    Based on Craig Engel's comments about Hassan I would be shocked if he ran under 90mpw and probably often in the 100-110mpw range.

    So if you're wondering why Muir can't hang with her on a fast pace...

  • registered

    rekrunner

    Member since 09/27/2015.

    12,623 posts. Last post 1 day ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 11:13am EDT
    re: Armstronglivs

    Armstronglivs wrote:

    As I said - self-absorbed waffle. Add linguistic drivel to the mix.

    Still too many words?

    Meanwhile, for all of your responses, my initial statement "False accusations of clean athletes are bad for the sport" remains uncontested, as you instantly switched goalposts, and have not argued that false doping accusations of clean athletes guilty only of succeeding is actually good for the sport.

    And my subsequent statement that there are not many performances faster than Ingrid Kristiansen's 10000m from 1986, in the last 35 years, remains equally uncontested.

  • registered

    Armstronglivs

    Member since 10/05/2018.

    29,537 posts. Last post 7 hours ago.
    2 years ago 06/14/2021 11:32pm EDT
    re: rekrunner

    rekrunner wrote:

    Armstronglivs wrote:

    As I said - self-absorbed waffle. Add linguistic drivel to the mix.

    Still too many words?

    Meanwhile, for all of your responses, my initial statement "False accusations of clean athletes are bad for the sport" remains uncontested, as you instantly switched goalposts, and have not argued that false doping accusations of clean athletes guilty only of succeeding is actually good for the sport.

    And my subsequent statement that there are not many performances faster than Ingrid Kristiansen's 10000m from 1986, in the last 35 years, remains equally uncontested.

    You're only commenter capable of gaslighting yourself.

1 9 10

Jump To A Page

Next Last
New Forum Moderation Information & Rules Search Troubleshooting

This thread has already been deleted.

Note: We review 100% of reports submitted. Visit our moderation dashboard to view statistics on our moderating activity. If you have a question or concern, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com or call us at our toll-free phone number:

1-844-LETSRUN (1-844-538-7786).

Author
Body
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?
What forum rule may this post have broken?

View our Terms Of Service for a complete description of our forum policies.

Provide context for this post report if relevant.

Reply Replying to

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview
By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Message Board