This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Untrue. I look at Burke and the CDC one and one more. Prasad agrees with me on the key paper, to boot (which you ignored, like all the other questions posed to you).
It’s easy to argue when you simply avoid any question that weakens your position.
Geez! You're just hoping people don't check these studies. Burke isn't even a cited study. I went through each study in table 1 using mRNA vaccine drugs. Each of them used the entire population of vaccinated in the study as the denominator in the rate calculation, not just sick people. However, when looking at COVID+ cases, they only used people seeking medical attention in the denominator. Below is each of the studies looking at mRNA vaccine drugs:
Mevorach - used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Witberg et al., - used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Barda et al., used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Walter et al., used entire vaccinated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) El Sahly et al., used entire vaccinated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) Ali et al., used entire vaccinnated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) Diaz et al, used entire population of vaccinated who were part of a health care system (not just sick people) Simone et al., used entire population of vaccinated who were part of Kaiser Permanente (not just sick people) Husby et al., used entire population of vaccinated as denominator (not just sick people) Patone et al., used entire population of vaccinated as denominator (not just sick people
I was referring the what Prasad cited - you seem to be a fan 😊 - you know where he admitted the best study he could find showed that COVID causes more myocarditis than the vaccine in young males.
Most of these studies do not use the entire vaccinated population as a denominator. They use people with accessible healthcare records or even diagnostic billing codes - so those interacting with the healthcare system. This is a sample with similar bias to those seeking outpatient care for COVID. This is what Prasad takes issue with - not the extreme example you have concocted
Geez! You're just hoping people don't check these studies. Burke isn't even a cited study. I went through each study in table 1 using mRNA vaccine drugs. Each of them used the entire population of vaccinated in the study as the denominator in the rate calculation, not just sick people. However, when looking at COVID+ cases, they only used people seeking medical attention in the denominator. Below is each of the studies looking at mRNA vaccine drugs:
Mevorach - used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Witberg et al., - used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Barda et al., used entire vaccinated population as denominator (not just sick people) Walter et al., used entire vaccinated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) El Sahly et al., used entire vaccinated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) Ali et al., used entire vaccinnated population of study as denominator (not just sick people) Diaz et al, used entire population of vaccinated who were part of a health care system (not just sick people) Simone et al., used entire population of vaccinated who were part of Kaiser Permanente (not just sick people) Husby et al., used entire population of vaccinated as denominator (not just sick people) Patone et al., used entire population of vaccinated as denominator (not just sick people
I was referring the what Prasad cited - you seem to be a fan 😊 - you know where he admitted the best study he could find showed that COVID causes more myocarditis than the vaccine in young males.
Most of these studies do not use the entire vaccinated population as a denominator. They use people with accessible healthcare records or even diagnostic billing codes - so those interacting with the healthcare system. This is a sample with similar bias to those seeking outpatient care for COVID. This is what Prasad takes issue with - not the extreme example you have concocted
Harambro has a problem understanding basic statistical analysis. It’s no wonder he’s struggled these past 800+ pages.
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
It’s obvious that he isn’t here for the running discussion. He doesn’t post on any running related threads. Such an irrational love for the vaccine. There has to be something else going on. It’s ridiculous.
Whatever it is about you, he certainly hates you. You seem to push his buttons. Or maybe it’s the fact that you’re still alive without getting vaccinated that drives him crazy.
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
And if he is just a paid shill, Let’sRun must be low on the list of sites that need monitoring. They didn’t exactly send their best and brightest here.
“Unvaxxed COVID is what destroys your immune system” - Harambro 2/3/24
Your daily reminder that Hambro thinks that if you are unvaxxed and get Covid, your immune system is destroyed. It ceases to exit. It is gone. You have none.
This is the level of intelligence we are dealing with in these vaxtards. 🤦♂️
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
Good article on Novak. Exactly correct. And, yes, I've wondered myself about our resident "Snopes disinformation expert." I mean, who else, employed anyway, has the time, the passion, and the commitment to be still talking about the 2021/2022 experiment?
Moreover, their one-time demi-God in Paul Offit penned this article for the NEJM last year, and look at the conclusion he drew that, yes, many of us have been saying for quite some time. Ok, yeah, that's why we've shifted back to a monovalent, but, remember, the bivalent was never qualified in vivo in humans, which is ridiculous:
"On October 24, 2022, David Ho and colleagues released the results of a study examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose. They found “no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups.3 One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group.4 Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.
Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5."
"...booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised. In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later."
Yet, these Snopes disinformation experts and Big Pharma would disregard this advice and still push this crap on our kids. The point about the LNP is that it's still an imperfect technology, they can make their way through tight junctions, where the virus normally wouldn't (the virus has other strategies like ceramide bridges but not this virus), and release their spike protein payload all over the body. And we just don't know all of the ramifications of that. We insist that the data is good and capturing all of the signals, but the vast majority of adverse reactions didn't make their way to VAERS, like newly irregular conductivity issues in the heart.
People, like Djokovic, can make their own decisions, but Paul Offit really put the conversation to bed.
LetsRun has been identified as an influential running/track & field/sports related website. The Pfizer-Moderna led propaganda apparatus has hired an army to monitor and respond to all criticism of their so called "vaccines" and other Covid related profit generators. Harambe and 2600bro (who could be one person, two people or several people) are mercenary shills in that army. Heirs of Goebbels, they will be here, and at the other sites they keep an eye on, offering up canned dribble and boilerplate speeches until some such time that the payments from their handlers are ceased and the arrangement terminated.
*********
Behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is a drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation”. A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals are given talking points “and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream”, according to an email from Moderna.
Moderna’s disinformation arm is perpetuating the public discourse wars that have been raging since early in the pandemic, aimed at shutting down anything that might undermine Covid-19-related policies, including lockdowns and efforts to encourage mass vaccinations. These documents provide a new window into the process that has roiled speech debates over the last three years.
With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium. Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its “Blue Silk” artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around “competitor” issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.
Good article on Novak. Exactly correct. And, yes, I've wondered myself about our resident "Snopes disinformation expert." I mean, who else, employed anyway, has the time, the passion, and the commitment to be still talking about the 2021/2022 experiment?
Moreover, their one-time demi-God in Paul Offit penned this article for the NEJM last year, and look at the conclusion he drew that, yes, many of us have been saying for quite some time. Ok, yeah, that's why we've shifted back to a monovalent, but, remember, the bivalent was never qualified in vivo in humans, which is ridiculous:
"On October 24, 2022, David Ho and colleagues released the results of a study examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose. They found “no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups.3 One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group.4 Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.
Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5."
"...booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised. In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later."
Yet, these Snopes disinformation experts and Big Pharma would disregard this advice and still push this crap on our kids. The point about the LNP is that it's still an imperfect technology, they can make their way through tight junctions, where the virus normally wouldn't (the virus has other strategies like ceramide bridges but not this virus), and release their spike protein payload all over the body. And we just don't know all of the ramifications of that. We insist that the data is good and capturing all of the signals, but the vast majority of adverse reactions didn't make their way to VAERS, like newly irregular conductivity issues in the heart.
People, like Djokovic, can make their own decisions, but Paul Offit really put the conversation to bed.
Good article on Novak. Exactly correct. And, yes, I've wondered myself about our resident "Snopes disinformation expert." I mean, who else, employed anyway, has the time, the passion, and the commitment to be still talking about the 2021/2022 experiment?
Moreover, their one-time demi-God in Paul Offit penned this article for the NEJM last year, and look at the conclusion he drew that, yes, many of us have been saying for quite some time. Ok, yeah, that's why we've shifted back to a monovalent, but, remember, the bivalent was never qualified in vivo in humans, which is ridiculous:
"On October 24, 2022, David Ho and colleagues released the results of a study examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose. They found “no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups.3 One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group.4 Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.
Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5."
"...booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised. In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later."
Yet, these Snopes disinformation experts and Big Pharma would disregard this advice and still push this crap on our kids. The point about the LNP is that it's still an imperfect technology, they can make their way through tight junctions, where the virus normally wouldn't (the virus has other strategies like ceramide bridges but not this virus), and release their spike protein payload all over the body. And we just don't know all of the ramifications of that. We insist that the data is good and capturing all of the signals, but the vast majority of adverse reactions didn't make their way to VAERS, like newly irregular conductivity issues in the heart.
People, like Djokovic, can make their own decisions, but Paul Offit really put the conversation to bed.
Good article on Novak. Exactly correct. And, yes, I've wondered myself about our resident "Snopes disinformation expert." I mean, who else, employed anyway, has the time, the passion, and the commitment to be still talking about the 2021/2022 experiment?
Moreover, their one-time demi-God in Paul Offit penned this article for the NEJM last year, and look at the conclusion he drew that, yes, many of us have been saying for quite some time. Ok, yeah, that's why we've shifted back to a monovalent, but, remember, the bivalent was never qualified in vivo in humans, which is ridiculous:
"On October 24, 2022, David Ho and colleagues released the results of a study examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose. They found “no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups.3 One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group.4 Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.
Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5."
"...booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised. In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later."
Yet, these Snopes disinformation experts and Big Pharma would disregard this advice and still push this crap on our kids. The point about the LNP is that it's still an imperfect technology, they can make their way through tight junctions, where the virus normally wouldn't (the virus has other strategies like ceramide bridges but not this virus), and release their spike protein payload all over the body. And we just don't know all of the ramifications of that. We insist that the data is good and capturing all of the signals, but the vast majority of adverse reactions didn't make their way to VAERS, like newly irregular conductivity issues in the heart.
People, like Djokovic, can make their own decisions, but Paul Offit really put the conversation to bed.
We present early vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates of the 2023 seasonal COVID-19 vaccination campaign using XBB.1.5 vaccine against COVID-19 hospitalization and ICU admission in previously vaccinated adults ≥60 years old i...
I suppose it is a “gotcha” that a booster design was imperfect. But we did the studies and designed a better one - hardly a waste of money, those studies!
Remember also that this Snopes Disinfo "expert" was very vocal at one point about how immune imprinting wasn't happening.
Well it wasn’t, until it happened very mildly after the bivalent. So we changed our strategy. Things can change, good thing we spend the $ to do the studies and learn.
Remember also that this Snopes Disinfo "expert" was very vocal at one point about how immune imprinting wasn't happening.
Well it wasn’t, until it happened very mildly after the bivalent. So we changed our strategy. Things can change, good thing we spend the $ to do the studies and learn.
Uhhh, well, that's a major about face, and, it's still happening, but we don't have "formal studies" to prove it yet. I mean, this is one of the foundational things that you hung your hat on and called anyone who alleged differently or even brought up the possibility a moron and included lots of "data," at the time that showed it wasn't happening. Clueless.
