ex-runner wrote:
You have no idea what you are talking about.
The boxer would strike first and accurately because he knows what he's doing. He's not going to hesitate and push the other guy cursing.
Being big doesn't give you superpowers like in the movies.
Also you might want to consider that the 900lb punch Ricky Hatton delivered according to the scientists was 10x the power delivered by the average man tested. So I'm not sure who you think has the more powerful punch but my money would be on the boxer.
Technique is everything.
There's no way I'd want to get into a fight with a professional flyweight boxer because I'm not an idiot. Those guys weigh ~110lbs.
"A study of seven Olympic boxers in weight classes ranging from flyweight to super heavyweight showed a range of 447 to 1,066 pounds of peak punching force. Energy transferred from punch to target varied widely depending on how heavy the boxers’ hands and gloves were, how fast they punched, and how rigidly they held their wrists. The three flyweights, interestingly, delivered more oomph than all but the two super heavyweights."
Super heavyweight boxers are professionals typically weighing in excess of 17 stone.
The lack of understanding of boxing on this running forum is apparent.
There are an awful lot of’ifs’ in you statements.
Basically, everything has to go right for the little guy. Perfect punch, perfect distance, strike first, hit him in the nose, big guy has to be just standing still not ready to fight, little guy has to get off multiple punches. All the bigger guy has to do is hit him once and it’s lights out.
I get it. Everyone wants the little guy to win. We love underdogs. But sorry, This isn’t the movies.