Opus 1 wrote:
I Think wrote:I think it is one wherein adults recognize typos for what they are and do not think themselves oh-so-clever in pointing them out.
I bet you are the life of the party. You should change your handle to Mr. Serious.
I love that "I bet you are the life of the party" response.
Cute. Stupid, of course. But cute.
I Think wrote:
Opus 1 wrote:I bet you are the life of the party. You should change your handle to Mr. Serious.
I love that "I bet you are the life of the party" response.
Cute. Stupid, of course. But cute.
Didn't mean to hurt your telling, bro.
Time for you to head to Algebra class. Tell Ms. Jenkins hello for me.
Opus 1 wrote:
incomprehensible wrote:I can't understand this sentence because it has a close quote but no open quote.
Oh, that's so Obvious.
Just because we are all adults here, except for you, does not mean we are the same person.
Opus 1 wrote:
I Think wrote:I love that "I bet you are the life of the party" response.
Cute. Stupid, of course. But cute.
Didn't mean to hurt your telling, bro.
Time for you to head to Algebra class. Tell Ms. Jenkins hello for me.
Quite the classic response. Belly laugh.
I Think wrote:
Opus 1 wrote:Oh, that's so Obvious.
Just because we are all adults here, except for you, does not mean we are the same person.
Oops. "I Think" (see what I did there) you forgot to change your username back before posting. lolz
Ohio Police Officer Accused Of Shooting News Photographer
Andy Grimm says he was shot without warning while setting up a camera and tripod.
I Think wrote:
Opus 1 wrote:Oh, that's so Obvious.
Just because we are all adults here, except for you, does not mean we are the same person.
Or even the same bot.
Opus 1 wrote:
I Think wrote:I love that "I bet you are the life of the party" response.
Cute. Stupid, of course. But cute.
Didn't mean to hurt your telling, bro.
Time for you to head to Algebra class. Tell Ms. Jenkins hello for me.
No worries, dude. Your stupidity can only hurt your life - nobody else'.
I Think wrote:
Opus 1 wrote:Didn't mean to hurt your telling, bro.
Time for you to head to Algebra class. Tell Ms. Jenkins hello for me.
No worries, dude. Your stupidity can only hurt your life - nobody else'.
I didn't write that.
Stop using my handle. I know my superior intellect makes you want to assume my identity, but I'm warning you to stop now.
I Think wrote:
Opus 1 wrote:Didn't mean to hurt your telling, bro.
Time for you to head to Algebra class. Tell Ms. Jenkins hello for me.
No worries, dude. Your stupidity can only hurt your life - nobody else'.
I can't understand this sentence because it has a close quote but no open quote.
I wonder what former 3:49 miler, NCAA XC champion and multiple track title winner, Joe Falcon, who is a cop today, has to say about this?.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/09/04/utah-hospital-bars-cops-from-contact-with-nurses-after-appalling-arrest/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.a01c0b83898d
While I certainly understand the hospitals position, their response only serves to make bad feelings even worse. Police are routinely called to hospitals for all sorts of complaints. Larcenies, assaults, EDP's, medical assists, you name it and if you are in an ER most anywhere you don't have to look to hard to find a cop. To make the big wall that was abruptly built now even bigger makes little sense. It will make it harder on victims, nursing staff and the police if nobody is allowed to talk. Hospitals typically only have a couple of supervisors on that would be able to assist the police with now even the most mundane tasks. If I can't even ask what room the assault victim is in, how am I supposed to interview them? Please wait here sir, the supervisor will be down in around a half hour to tell you the room number.
What about instances where time is of the essence because of suspects getting away or other people that may be in danger? What if it is a crime in progress taking place in the hospital? I can't tell you where the gunman went, I'm sorry. You can bet there will be nurses who will say just that.
I don't see their new policy working out very well. In fact if anyone is injured or worse because of delays that were obviously related to this new policy, you can bet the hospital will be paying dearly. People are always looking for reasons to make a few dol, uh, make sure that wrongs are righted and justice is upheld, and you can bet attorneys who specialize in claims against hospitals will be watching closely.
long time cop wrote:
While I certainly understand the hospitals position, their response only serves to make bad feelings even worse. Police are routinely called to hospitals for all sorts of complaints. Larcenies, assaults, EDP's, medical assists, you name it and if you are in an ER most anywhere you don't have to look to hard to find a cop. To make the big wall that was abruptly built now even bigger makes little sense. It will make it harder on victims, nursing staff and the police if nobody is allowed to talk. Hospitals typically only have a couple of supervisors on that would be able to assist the police with now even the most mundane tasks. If I can't even ask what room the assault victim is in, how am I supposed to interview them? Please wait here sir, the supervisor will be down in around a half hour to tell you the room number.
What about instances where time is of the essence because of suspects getting away or other people that may be in danger? What if it is a crime in progress taking place in the hospital? I can't tell you where the gunman went, I'm sorry. You can bet there will be nurses who will say just that.
I don't see their new policy working out very well. In fact if anyone is injured or worse because of delays that were obviously related to this new policy, you can bet the hospital will be paying dearly. People are always looking for reasons to make a few dol, uh, make sure that wrongs are righted and justice is upheld, and you can bet attorneys who specialize in claims against hospitals will be watching closely.
Maybe the policeman should have considered all of those things prior to his illegal assault and false imprisonment of a nurse.
The hospital has their own security.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
long time cop wrote:While I certainly understand the hospitals position, their response only serves to make bad feelings even worse. Police are routinely called to hospitals for all sorts of complaints. Larcenies, assaults, EDP's, medical assists, you name it and if you are in an ER most anywhere you don't have to look to hard to find a cop. To make the big wall that was abruptly built now even bigger makes little sense. It will make it harder on victims, nursing staff and the police if nobody is allowed to talk. Hospitals typically only have a couple of supervisors on that would be able to assist the police with now even the most mundane tasks. If I can't even ask what room the assault victim is in, how am I supposed to interview them? Please wait here sir, the supervisor will be down in around a half hour to tell you the room number.
What about instances where time is of the essence because of suspects getting away or other people that may be in danger? What if it is a crime in progress taking place in the hospital? I can't tell you where the gunman went, I'm sorry. You can bet there will be nurses who will say just that.
I don't see their new policy working out very well. In fact if anyone is injured or worse because of delays that were obviously related to this new policy, you can bet the hospital will be paying dearly. People are always looking for reasons to make a few dol, uh, make sure that wrongs are righted and justice is upheld, and you can bet attorneys who specialize in claims against hospitals will be watching closely.
Maybe the policeman should have considered all of those things prior to his illegal assault and false imprisonment of a nurse.
The hospital has their own security.
I think you need to look up the statute for assault.
An illegal arrest IS assault. No way around it
Several have mentioned the Police attitude of absolute authority. You just summed it up nicely.
This is not about interfering with the police during a crime in progress. The woman followed hospital policy and a supreme court ruling. Then she was assaulted for it because it made the officer mad that he did not get his way (which was the illegal way). You seem to think that being "on the ground" gives the right to override the supreme court and stomp on people's rights. It does not and never will. The police are intended to protect and serve. They are not intended to be the brute squad who decides what is right or wrong on a case by case basis.
The cop's been fired.
DiscoGary wrote:
The cop's been fired.
Long time cop, you were doing so-so until this last post of yours. Could you not think of anything else that has nothing to do with this case?
That cop is an idiot. He doesn't even understand a citizen's right to be free from search and seizure with a warrant. The nurse, even though not employed in law enforcement, knew that to a seizure of her patient's blood required consent or a warrant. The patient was a victim and not a suspect of any crime. The cop then makes an arrest of the nurse without probable cause. His actions are inexcusable. That police dept is going to be paying out a ton of money because of that stupid cop.
Without