What’s the basis for your claim that “just about every female athlete at the Games has higher than average testosterone”?
Also, when you say nearly every female athlete at the Games has “higher than average testosterone” are you suggesting most are doping? Or do you mean they have natural testosterone that’s higher than average for females?
If you’re talking about natural T, are you saying that just about nearly all the female athletes at the 2024 Paris Games have natural T at or above the top end of the normal female range (0.12-1.68 nmol/L)? Or that they have more natural T than the mean levels found amongst the general female population (0.6–0.7 nmol/L)?
If you’re talking about natural T levels, your contention contradicts previous findings about elite female track & field athletes competing at the highest levels.
In 2011, extensive hormone testing was performed on blood samples taken from 849 of the 855 athletes who competed in the women's category as the 2011 IAAF World Championships. Ten athletes were determined to be XY DSD or doping, so their results were separated from the rest.
The 839 remaining athletes were found to have T levels “close to those reported in sedentary young women.”
The median level of T for the world's top female athletes in track & field in 2011 was found to be 0.69 nmol/L. 75% had T under .94 nmol/L.
Only 9 out of the 839 best athletes in women’s international track & field had T levels above 3.0 nmol/L - and the researchers suspected that 6 of them might be doping or have undisclosed XY DSDs and testes.
I think it’s unlikely that the natural T levels of the female athletes competing in the 2024 Paris Olympic Games are markedly different to the T levels of the female athletes who competed at the 2011 IAAF World Championship.
But if you have evidence showing otherwise, I’ll be happy to change my mind. So please share your “receipts.”
I’ll be waiting with bated breath.