Official Covid Vaccine thread

But person on TV sick!!!

Person on TV sick after multiple jabs.

Me not sick 1371 of the last 1373 days after zero jabs.

But Pfizer and Moderna do not make money on natural immunity.

I see that you state facts about Behar.

i’ll grant you that you’re stating facts about yourself, even though I can’t confirm that independently.

so what point can a person reasonably infer from those facts? By that, I mean a point that is actually relevant to any responsible argument about Covid vaccines?

Watch it there Mister! if you take away anecdotal “proof” from the antivax crowd then this board will be barren wasteland.

I mean, if you have good arguments to make, my recommendation is that you restrict yourself to making them, making them alone, and making them as well as you can

That will serve you in two ways

1. Obviously enough. It will provide better evidence for the case you want to make.

2. you’ll be able to make that case without repeatedly undermining your credibility by posting illogical nonsense.

Or do you think your natural immunity also protects you from consistently shooting yourself in the foot?

Unfortunate that you folks are down to this type of gibberish.

Tomorrow is 3 years since the vax was introduced. Will there be a celebration in this thread ?

Yes they do (or are trying to).

Google 'autoimmune therapies'

A common side effect of unvaxxed COVID infection. You too may be a Pfizer customer when the long term effects appear. I wish you luck.

I will always celebrate millions of lives saved. I guess you don't. Peculiar.

He doesn't.

Hence the tactic is a tsunami of non-sequiturs.

mediamanipulation.org

Distributed amplification

Distributed amplification is a tactic whereby a campaign operator explicitly or implicitly directs participants to rapidly and widely disseminate campaign materials, which may include propaganda and misinformation as well as...

Link:mediamanipulation.org/definitions/dist...

That's the tactic used by the vax mob mafia in Summer 2021 when they engineered a barrage of headlines and talking points that screamed "99% OF COVID DEATHS ARE AMONG THE UNVACCINATED" and "THIS HAS BECOME A PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED".

Amusing to look back at it all.

What number "booster" are you on ?

😂

Your point? Or are you giving examples of a tsunami of non-sequiturs.

Cheers

Did you post this comment in the NY Times about the 24-year-old who died after getting vaxxed ?

Happy 3 years of Covid "vaccines", or in my case, 3 years of NO mRNA goop.

**********

M
Richmond
Dec. 13
So as an avid user of the internet, I have seen many horrific things. One of these things was the death of the gorilla, Harambe, in which a three year old boy accidentally fell into the enclosure of the gorilla Harambe, who was then shot to protect the child. Many angry individuals took to the internet, and although many criticized the mother for not keeping a watchful eye, a significantly vocal minority not only took to harassing and wishing death on the mother, but the child, for years to come.

The child was only three years old, and people were sending him death threats.

The thing is, I have seen this sort of tragic anger be repeated again and again, where people want to point the finger of blame and anger at some specific person or group of people, rather than accept that these things happen.

That instead of being the victim of chance, some intangible and therefore unpunishable entity, that there is an individual or group of individuals out there responsible for our heartache, individuals we can harangue, whom we can threaten and intimidate. Many people find it more acceptable that there is a bad actor more than simply just bad events, even if that bad actor is a three year old child.

Anger after all can empower us inspite of our inability to change thinks or our inadequacies in certain areas, but it can easily arise as a denial of bad things happening just because. Just world hypothesis and all that.

Must ignore real life experience.

Listen to Big Pharma.

Got it

My aunt is nearly 90 and has been smoking 2 packs/day for over 70 years.

A friend never smoked a day in her life. She told her kids and the kids in her church youth group not to smoke. She died of lung cancer before she was 60.

Therefore, refraining from smoking does not reduce one’s chance of dying from lung cancer.

That’s roughly the kind of gibberish and nonsense “reasoning” you post over and over on these boards. It’s a wonder you’re not embarrassed by it and taking pains to correct it.

And if you’d say, “But this is what’s different about the vaccine from your smoking example …,” somewhere in that difference is where you might make a reasonable argument. But the stuff you decide to post is almost always illogical.

Disingenuous troll leans into willful misunderstanding for the thousandth time.

Bad analogy winner for today

Denying the obvious.

Your point? Or are you giving examples of a tsunami of non-sequiturs.
Cheers