First off, thanks to all those who wrote supportive posts on here! I really appreciate it.
As Stephen writes, the "average runner" may be looking for a Boston Qualifier (or low 3-hour marathon instead of a 4-hour marathon etc). PR times aside, I actually think I can relate to them pretty well though (we've coached a lot of people to sub 3s).
My journey of trying to OTQ again and fail by 12 seconds (in 2016) and 50 seconds in (2020) is similar (imo) to those trying to BQ and just miss the cut-off. Sure, the raw times (and a lot of aspects of my lifestyle) might not be very relatable....but I think the processes and mindset and physical training (in terms of pushing one's own limits and finding their own potential) are pretty similar actually. Whether or not they can relate to me compared to a newer influencer though is another story though (I am getting slower as I get older though...especially after my PE!). But idea of "chasing a fast marathon time" is similar between a BQ and OTQ imo. I'd even write *some* similar workouts for you that I'd write for myself (with paces changed obviously). You pushing to PR and run a sub 2:50 (or whatever) is like me when I was pushing to run another sub 2:20.
The earlier post I wrote on here wasn't so much about certain fast times (that an influencer may or may not have). It's more about the background, knowledge and experience in the sport that many seemingly don't have (As well as any knowledge of exercise science and what actually goes into a periodized training plan).. A lot of them never even ran track or xc in school....so they are often not very experienced with pacing a 5km even....There's no respect for the distance or the history/traditions of the sport.
There are plenty of great coaches that are not "super fast runners" themselves and it is certainly not a requirement. But experience, knowledge (and as you mention "relatability") might attract a certain demographic of customer to your coaching programs or your training plans...and that will influence your popularity and financial success. I don't coach people around my times usually though, and our fastest marathon plan is the "Sub 2:45 plan". Personally I have a template for what it takes crack 2:20 (I've done it half a dozen times and shown a lot of consistency there), but that's not our main demographic/speed of runners. I'd rather help people BQ than OTQ.
So my point wasn't so much that "so and so influencer is only a 2:57 guy":.....it's more: "he just started running himself 3 years ago....so how much does he actually know about running coaching and the science of running?"
For example, if I'm training you for the Houston Marathon right now you can be confident I know that course pretty well and how it runs (I raced the Houston Marathon 4 times over the years!....2 of those were sub 2:20). Or are you going to listen to a guy who ran it once over 3 hours with a selfie stick? I guess for some (many?) maybe it is the latter because he made a video during the race and talked about slurping down 7 Maurtens on film!
At the end of the day people can do what they want and it's a capitalistic market obviously. People drool over "shoe porn" because the influencer game is all about flaunting consumerism and materialism in the latest "swag drop," showing off the newest finisher medal, and filming that morning coffee shot in the fancy hotel you got comped. There are certainly no "full proof marathon training plans" and no promises in the sport. What I don't like is misinformation that spreads as well as "bad tips" and "bad advice." As you know from content creation it's often the "clickbait" and "fast fix hacks" and "hybrid athlete 'let's go' motivation reels" that win the attention. In that sense I think some influences do a disservice to the sport in a way.