BiGPharMa MedCaid BoaTLOOOad o moNies 💵
This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
-
33
-
WHtY TryN sooHarD Poison ☠️Medicaid RegiStarants
Fauci 😠😖😡😠
43 -
43
-
Shtstack Blogger, MD wrote:
Me atto low incomE healthcare clinic . Signz alL overr in said geTIn boooster but me print substack sh*tstack fo docs medicAId
Which vaccine lunatic are you, blogger ? I believe you are one of the regulars in this thread.
Give us a hint.
37 -
LoTTa SpNaish siGNz🪧 at MediCaId ClINIcs2 go BOOSTIN
Fauci 👨⚕️💉😖💉😤😠😠😠😠
43 -
DanM wrote:
Shtstack Blogger, MD wrote:
Me atto low incomE healthcare clinic . Signz alL overr in said geTIn boooster but me print substack sh*tstack fo docs medicAId
Which vaccine lunatic are you, blogger ? I believe you are one of the regulars in this thread.
Give us a hint.
FauCI n PharMana man WannTI pooR guys MOneis 💵💰💸
43 -
Shtstack Blogger, MD wrote:
LoTTa SpNaish siGNz🪧 at MediCaId ClINIcs2 go BOOSTIN
Fauci 👨⚕️💉😖💉😤😠😠😠😠
BiggIPHaRmA ALLL oveR ussss
53 -
DanM wrote:
Shtstack Blogger, MD wrote:
Me atto low incomE healthcare clinic . Signz alL overr in said geTIn boooster but me print substack sh*tstack fo docs medicAId
Which vaccine lunatic are you, blogger ? I believe you are one of the regulars in this thread.
Give us a hint.
GeTT BOOOsTIN, mostle SpNaish siGn 🪧 bad 👿👿😰
Fauci 💰💉😡🤬😖😠😖😠😖😠😖😠😖HallOOOOweNNN i FuRREE 🙀
53 -
ThIss Is AmEyicA JacK!!!!! 🇺🇸
43 -
DanM wrote:
Shtstack Blogger, MD wrote:
Me atto low incomE healthcare clinic . Signz alL overr in said geTIn boooster but me print substack sh*tstack fo docs medicAId
Which vaccine lunatic are you, blogger ? I believe you are one of the regulars in this thread.
Give us a hint.
Fauci 😡
43 -
doctor here wrote:
Newname wrote:
Seems 7 million people have gotten the latest booster. Which is being pushed by the CDC. In a nation of 330 million people. About 2%.
Last year it was 18 million Americans who had taken the latest booster.
I have to conclude that it took some time but people woke up to the fact they had been lied to
I conclude it's that risk of COVID is simply no longer sufficient to convince people they need more protection.
Obviously this reduction is risk comes from highly effect prior vaccination campaigns.
You are going against the advice of the CDC to take this latest booster and so have now joined we antivaxxers. Welcome. It's about time
35 -
Vaxxers effing up on a massive scale. They are wrong about everything these days.
11 -
DanM wrote:
Vaxxers effing up on a massive scale. They are wrong about everything these days.
300k dead Americans
12 -
41
-
24% of Americans say they know someone who has died from the Covid vaccine:
43 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
24% of Americans say they know someone who has died from the Covid vaccine:
As a sanity check, the same Rasmussen poll says that 47% of respondents know someone who died of covid.
There have been about 1.2M covid deaths in the US since the start of the pandemic, so we'd expect something on the order of half this number of vaccine deaths if the polling impression reflects reality. Thus there would be something over a half million vaccine deaths which surely would show up in the population death statistics.
Where are they?
The dilemma then is one can down vote this post to show your fury or you can provide some plausible data that shows these respondent's view is consistent with objective data.
And we know with high confidence how that's going to go.
Down vote arrow is here:
.................V
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted. Reason provided: Adjust pointer to down vote button22 -
Monkeys Skyping wrote:
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
24% of Americans say they know someone who has died from the Covid vaccine:
As a sanity check, the same Rasmussen poll says that 47% of respondents know someone who died of covid.
There have been about 1.2M covid deaths in the US since the start of the pandemic, so we'd expect something on the order of half this number of vaccine deaths if the polling impression reflects reality. Thus there would be something over a half million vaccine deaths which surely would show up in the population death statistics.
Where are they?
The dilemma then is one can down vote this post to show your fury or you can provide some plausible data that shows these respondent's view is consistent with objective data.
And we know with high confidence how that's going to go.
Down vote arrow is here:
.................V
But how do you know the data is accurately catching some deaths? For instance, I know of three people who died shortly after they received the vaccine. One from an exploratory surgery after she declined rapidly after getting her second dose. Two others from sudden heart events. Both were early 50s, very fit, no comorbidities. No abnormal EKGs or echos, and their families were stunned quite frankly. They died suddenly right after getting their vaccines. None of these would be reported as vaccine-related deaths, but good luck convincing their families or anyone who knew them. By contrast, I know of one Covid death that happened early in the pandemic in a guy who was obese and had COPD and was vented almost immediately.
The 300,000 deaths is a dumb and disingenuous number. 90% of them were in a high risk group who all should’ve been vaccinated. No argument there. The other 10% were people we could’ve saved had we broken from the orthodox hospital protocols of Remdesivir and steroids only, followed my Midozolam and morphine ventilation, among other sedation. There were fringe doctors who saved part of this unvaccinated population.
It blows my mind that parents are dumb enough to be giving their five-year old kids this new iteration of the vaccine. People are stupid. It should be obvious to all by now for most demographics. Coronaviruses mutate extremely rapidly, so much so that the new vaccine is not matched to the new strain. Paul Offit is not recommending it based on risk/reward. Are you going to sit here and try to tell me with a straight face that the vaccine didn’t help expedite this mutation?
21 -
Covidiocy wrote:
Monkeys Skyping wrote:
As a sanity check, the same Rasmussen poll says that 47% of respondents know someone who died of covid.
There have been about 1.2M covid deaths in the US since the start of the pandemic, so we'd expect something on the order of half this number of vaccine deaths if the polling impression reflects reality. Thus there would be something over a half million vaccine deaths which surely would show up in the population death statistics.
Where are they?
The dilemma then is one can down vote this post to show your fury or you can provide some plausible data that shows these respondent's view is consistent with objective data.
And we know with high confidence how that's going to go.
Down vote arrow is here:
.................V
But how do you know the data is accurately catching some deaths? . . .
By the argument above, what you call "some deaths" is on the order of a half million deaths. Even if that many deaths were miscategorized one would expect them to show up as a bump in the excess death stats and/or in death by cause stats. I've looked at this stuff (and presented some of this the thread) and I'm not seeing it.
Could there be adverse results from vaccination significantly above what is being reported by the CDC? Certainly, though I haven't seen credible data supporting this. Could there be adverse results from vaccination on an order consistent with the subject Rassmussen poll. Almost certainly not.
11 -
Ok, I for one, do not think government data accurately captures adverse vaccine events. And, to be fair, it can’t. I have another buddy, vax-promoting, John Oliver loving, liberal pilot who recently threw an abnormal EKG reflecting some kind of conduction issue. It happened not too long after his booster. Now, can we unequivocally say that this was an adverse event? No, we cannot. And he would never push to try to find the correlation. And what I’ve all my acquaintances who have reactivated shingles or Epstein Barr? This is even in the literature that this may be happening.
As far as excess deaths, yes, I take your point. But, again, many deaths that were ascribed to “Covid” after vaccination could’ve been vaccine induced and pulled forward.
21 -
Covidiocy wrote:
Ok, I for one, do not think government data accurately captures adverse vaccine events. And, to be fair, it can’t. I have another buddy, vax-promoting, John Oliver loving, liberal pilot who recently threw an abnormal EKG reflecting some kind of conduction issue. It happened not too long after his booster. Now, can we unequivocally say that this was an adverse event? No, we cannot. And he would never push to try to find the correlation. And what I’ve all my acquaintances who have reactivated shingles or Epstein Barr? This is even in the literature that this may be happening.
As far as excess deaths, yes, I take your point. But, again, many deaths that were ascribed to “Covid” after vaccination could’ve been vaccine induced and pulled forward.
Thank you for sharing your feelings.
I still believe on the evidence, the Rasmussen poll of feelings is inconsistent with reality.
11
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.