cool as a cucumber, alright.
The face of an angry spoiled fratboy being told for the first time in his life that there might be consequences for actions:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You don't get to claim Kavanaugh's yearbook was true and then say Blasey Ford's was all fabricated. Blasey Ford was a partying drunk slut throughout high school and college.
Blasey Ford DID NOT give her personal yearbook to Shad Olson--a hardcore, right-wing, creator of FAKE news.
this is it wrote:
https://i.imgur.com/n7ZwB0z.png
If you're looking for a stupid post...this is it.
Haha, I see the Hillary campaign team is still trying to learn how to make memes.
Virtually no mention of the Holton Arms yearbooks in the mainstream media. Rush Limbaugh has mentioned them, and there was a passing reference to them on Fox. They’ve been scrubbed off the internet, but cached copies are floating around.
Shad Olson Show wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You don't get to claim Kavanaugh's yearbook was true and then say Blasey Ford's was all fabricated. Blasey Ford was a partying drunk slut throughout high school and college.
Blasey Ford DID NOT give her personal yearbook to Shad Olson--a hardcore, right-wing, creator of FAKE news.
Her friends certainly did everything they could to scrub her yearbook away and STILL FAILED. Your girl was no paragon of virtue.
Every time Ford and Kavanaugh answered the question — and didn't answer the question
Ford answered every single question
Kavanaugh = massive fail
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Her friends certainly did everything they could to scrub her yearbook away and STILL FAILED. Your girl was no paragon of virtue.
Extreme right-winger, Shad Olson--a millennial--, does not have a time machine to go back and secretly photograph teenage Christine Blasey's year book, nor her personal diaries.
https://i.imgur.com/cEMYiap.gifTheOhioState wrote:
this is it wrote:
https://i.imgur.com/n7ZwB0z.pngIf you're looking for a stupid post...this is it.
Shad Olson Show wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Her friends certainly did everything they could to scrub her yearbook away and STILL FAILED. Your girl was no paragon of virtue.
Extreme right-winger, Shad Olson--a millennial--, does not have a time machine to go back and secretly photograph teenage Christine Blasey's year book, nor her personal diaries.
Actually yes he does, and he did
Thought everyone might want to take a break from posting juvenile memes and advocating for the repeal of the 21st amendment to read this.
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/
Wow, the paid party-train is on full speed tonight.
Are you also developing trusted sources to discredit California's move to have even stronger Net Neutrality?
Shad Olson Show wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Her friends certainly did everything they could to scrub her yearbook away and STILL FAILED. Your girl was no paragon of virtue.
Extreme right-winger, Shad Olson--a millennial--, does not have a time machine to go back and secretly photograph teenage Christine Blasey's year book, nor her personal diaries.
He doesn't need one and doesn't need a camera, just download/copy from the net, which he did.
Shad Olson Show wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You don't get to claim Kavanaugh's yearbook was true and then say Blasey Ford's was all fabricated. Blasey Ford was a partying drunk slut throughout high school and college.
Blasey Ford DID NOT give her personal yearbook to Shad Olson--a hardcore, right-wing, creator of FAKE news.
He's "hardcore, right-wing" so "her personal yearbook" must be "FAKE news".
IDIOT.
It's either true or it isn't, so far it appears to be true.
President Ronald Reagan was great at picking justices EVERYONE agreed with
Sandra Day O' Conner 99-0
Scalia 98-0
Kennedy 97-0
He also picked William Rehnquist who was voted in 65-33
If Kavanaugh does not get in, who could President Trump select that everyone would agree with, and get voted in like those 3 like between 95-100 to Zero (I guess when the total is not 100 means at least 1 person did not vote) or if not unanimous at least 90 for and a maximum of 10 against?
Thank you in advance
Slow UR Roll peabrain wrote:
Slow your roll wrote:
What a load of feces. "That doesn't disprove her claims?" No one has to "disprove" an accuser's claims. The accuser has to prove them. Stating otherwise is intellectually dishonest or intellectually deficient.
Here ya go peabrain.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/3rd-kavanaugh-accuser-history-legal-disputes-100137653.html
Since what you posted has nothing to do with with the point, you are worse than a peabrain.
