Its hard to track what I believe to be the error when the projections keep changing but my concern is in cases where the number of teams in consideration is dropping below 18. I think in some cases this is because of pushes, but Im not entirely sure. Figured I should point it out so that others can take a look, would hate to see people get excited and then have the algorithm be wrong.
Anyone have a lead on Mountain Region results? Bueller?
For women:
Someone said Colorado women, then New Mexico, then Air Force.
Looks like Stanford may have won out West, followed by Washington? Math can be tricky sometimes though.
Men's race in progress
Found Mountain results. Colorado women crush it.
http://www.liverunningresults.com/public_html/events/d1regxc2016/
LetsRun.com wrote:
Anyone have a lead on Mountain Region results? Bueller?
Women's individual:
http://www.liverunningresults.com/public_html/events/d1regxc2016/I'll run a report to get teams to you.
Womens results are up on the homepage link. Colorado crushed it with 35 points. New Mexico second in 100+. Five in before New Mexico's #2.
west regional womens results here
1 Colorado 35 4 6 7 8 10 12 21
Total Time: 1:41:48.11
Average: 20:21.62
2 New Mexico 109 1 11 27 34 36 58 82
Total Time: 1:43:51.20
Average: 20:46.24
3 Air Force 111 3 5 19 35 49 62 77
Total Time: 1:44:06.50
Average: 20:49.30
4 Utah 136 17 18 25 32 44 70 74
Total Time: 1:44:36.70
Average: 20:55.34
5 Byu 146 20 26 28 29 43 53 79
Total Time: 1:45:09.00
Average: 21:01.80
6 Colorado St. 147 13 14 38 40 42 46 63
Total Time: 1:44:51.60
Average: 20:58.32
7 Weber State 186 9 16 45 52 64 89 115
Total Time: 1:45:45.70
Average: 21:09.14
8 Utah State 232 15 37 51 54 75 87 90
Total Time: 1:47:03.40
Average: 21:24.68
9 Utep 233 2 24 47 55 105 122 135
Total Time: 1:47:05.50
Average: 21:25.10
10 Northern Arizona 262 30 31 56 67 78 84 93
Total Time: 1:47:58.00
Average: 21:35.60
Updated women's projections through 8/9 regions (only West to go)
Teams selected:
1 michigan
2 notre dame
3 penn state
4 villanova
5 missouri
6 oklahoma state
7 colorado
8 new mexico
9 providence
10 harvard
11 mississippi state
12 mississippi
13 arkansas
14 baylor
15 nc state
16 louisville
17 washington
18 stanford
19 portland
20 oregon
21 air force
22 utah
23 san francisco
24 iowa state
25 wisconsin
26 michigan state
27 eastern michigan
28 yale
29 byu
30 ohio state
31 california
Going from the individual results, I have
Stanford 71
Washington 91
San Fran 104
Oregon 119
Portland 134
UCLA 195 (I think they're sixth)
CycloneAlum wrote:
1 Colorado 35 4 6 7 8 10 12 21
Total Time: 1:41:48.11
Average: 20:21.62
2 New Mexico 109 1 11 27 34 36 58 82
Total Time: 1:43:51.20
Average: 20:46.24
3 Air Force 111 3 5 19 35 49 62 77
Total Time: 1:44:06.50
Average: 20:49.30
4 Utah 136 17 18 25 32 44 70 74
Total Time: 1:44:36.70
Average: 20:55.34
5 Byu 146 20 26 28 29 43 53 79
Total Time: 1:45:09.00
Average: 21:01.80
6 Colorado St. 147 13 14 38 40 42 46 63
Total Time: 1:44:51.60
Average: 20:58.32
7 Weber State 186 9 16 45 52 64 89 115
Total Time: 1:45:45.70
Average: 21:09.14
8 Utah State 232 15 37 51 54 75 87 90
Total Time: 1:47:03.40
Average: 21:24.68
9 Utep 233 2 24 47 55 105 122 135
Total Time: 1:47:05.50
Average: 21:25.10
10 Northern Arizona 262 30 31 56 67 78 84 93
Total Time: 1:47:58.00
Average: 21:35.60
Individual results?
Mountain top individual women
Results - Women
1 Wright, Alice New Mexico 19:59.90 1
2 Koech, Winny Utep 20:17.10 2
3 Carina, Gillespie Air Force 20:17.80 3
4 Smith, Jaci Air Force 20:19.90 5
4 Morley, Makena Colorado 20:19.90 4
6 Benner, Kaitlyn Colorado 20:20.30 6
7 Clark, Erin Colorado 20:20.70 7
8 Caldwell, Mackenzie Colorado 20:21.00 8
9 Child, Ellie Weber State 20:21.90 9
10 Scholl, Tabor Colorado 20:26.20 10
11 Thackery, Calli New Mexico 20:26.90 11
12 Jones, Dani Colorado 20:27.50 12
13 Lincks, Janelle Colorado St. 20:27.60 13
14 Gilfillan, Darby Colorado St. 20:28.30 14
15 Carter, Kashley Utah State 20:28.50 15
16 Whetten, Hailey Weber State 20:30.80 16
17 McInturff, Hannah Utah 20:32.50 17
18 Murphy, Grayson Utah 20:33.60 18
19 Long, Lindy Air Force 20:43.40 19
20 Silva, Yesenia Byu 20:45.50 20
21 Nun, Melanie Colorado 20:50.80 21
22 Gallop, Cora Nevada 20:52.50 22
23 Caro, Jocelyn Texas Tech 20:52.60 23
24 Koech, Lilian Utep 20:54.30 24
25 Tank, Poppy Utah 20:55.10 25
26 Birk, Erica Byu 20:56.40 26
27 Bernal, Natasha New Mexico 20:56.70 27
28 Young, Laura Byu 20:57.90 28
29 Hoj, Olivia Byu 21:03.80 29
29 Malaspina, Mikayla Northern Arizona 21:03.80 30
31 Townsend, Melanie Northern Arizona 21:07.30 31
32 Gehrich, Amanda Utah 21:09.70 32
33 Hamilton, Lauren Wyoming 21:10.10 33
34 Connor, Sophie New Mexico 21:13.50 34
35 Skold, Samantha Air Force 21:13.70 35
36 Buck, Alex New Mexico 21:14.20 36
37 Parker, Bailee Utah State 21:14.60 37
38 Spillar, McKenna Colorado St. 21:14.80 38
39 DeStefano, Audra Wyoming 21:15.30 39
40 Kallner, Ali Colorado St. 21:17.40 40
41 Snyder, Alyssa Montana State 21:23.30 41
42 White, Kate Colorado St. 21:23.50 42
43 Wayment, Courtney Byu 21:25.40 43
44 Slotboom, Giselle Utah 21:25.80 44
45 Sharp, Candace Weber State 21:26.20 45
46 Holland, Sanne Colorado St. 21:26.80 46
47 Jerotich, Gladys Utep 21:27.50 47
48 White, Kerry Wyoming 21:28.00 48
49 Burnham, Katherine Air Force 21:31.70 49
How do the NAU women suck so badly? Does Heins just not give a damn?
LetsRun.com wrote:
Men's projections thru 5/9 regions (MA, S, SC, NE, SE)
1 wisconsin
2 michigan state
3 georgetown
4 navy
5 oklahoma state
6 iowa state
7 northern arizona
8 byu
9 syracuse
10 iona
11 mississippi
12 middle tennessee
13 arkansas
14 texas
15 nc state
16 virginia
17 stanford
18 ucla
19 oregon
20 portland
21 washington state
22 boise state
23 dartmouth
24 providence
25 tulsa
26 furman
27 eastern kentucky
28 indiana
29 eastern michigan
30 colorado
31 utep
Does anyone honestly believe Colorado doesn't get an auto qualifier based upon their performance at Pac-12? I see them beating at least BYU if not NAU now that their veterans are running strong again.
Advanced Analytics wrote:
Its hard to track what I believe to be the error when the projections keep changing but my concern is in cases where the number of teams in consideration is dropping below 18. I think in some cases this is because of pushes, but Im not entirely sure. Figured I should point it out so that others can take a look, would hate to see people get excited and then have the algorithm be wrong.
We appreciate you pointing this out and will double-check the process before we publish our final list of qualifiers. Thanks!
Wow....USF!!
MWest wrote:
Going from the individual results, I have
Stanford 71
Washington 91
San Fran 104
Oregon 119
Portland 134
UCLA 195 (I think they're sixth)
Can someone rank the competitiveness of the Men's regions??
Another tie in the Midwest! This time for the second auto spot between Michigan State and Indiana. Michigan State wins on tiebreaker.
Wisconsin's Malachy Schrobilgen and Morgan McDonald go 1-2.
MSU 3 Indiana 4
Indiana 6 MSU 13
MSU 14 Indiana 19
MSU 22 Indiana 24
Indiana 28 MSU 29
1 Wisconsin 51
2 Michigan State 81
3 Indiana 81
4 Eastern Michigan 99
5 Michigan 107
6 Purdue 172
7 Ohio State 227
8 Butler 279
9 Indiana State 287
10 Dayton 305
11 IUPUI 347
12 Miami (Ohio) 361
13 Marquette 377
14 Notre Dame 429
15 Youngstown St. 438
16 Oakland 445
17 Cincinnati 481
18 Ohio 501
19 Bowling Green 509
20 Central Michigan 565
21 Wis.-Milwaukee 573
22 Toledo 581
23 Akron 627
24 Detroit 684
25 Xavier (Ohio) 700
26 Wright State 701
27 Wis.-Green Bay 721
28 IPFW 728
29 Valparaiso 809
South central the hardest.