wineturtle wrote:
Does the Heps have a published tie breaking procedure? What is it?
Recently, there had been zero tie breaking at Heps and all of the NCAA. Apparently, the NCAA reversed course and said they wanted all ties broken. The problem I have is the tiebreaking is scoring the top 5 basically as a dual meet (our 1 against your 1, 2 against 2, etc.). I'd much rather see it be the 6th man.
go green wrote:
here are the times of the 5th man, in order of team finish:
25:27
25:22
25:26
25:28
25:35
25:29
26:22
27:01
amazingly tight among the top 6 teams - the fun of heps is that if a team really really wants it they can upset the favorite.
That's pretty amazing.Great post.
I disagree with the sentiment "if a team really really wants it, they can upset the favorite." Maybe this year. But a lot of times in the last 5 years, Princeton has a juggernaut that scores 35 points and these teams scoring 65 or 75 are getting crushed.
Let's look at how many teams were in it the last few years.
2014 - Princeton wins with 30 points - wins by 44. Total rout. Only 2 teams under 100.
2013 -2 teams close. 3rd probably dreams of winning.
1. Columbia, 48
2. Princeton, 56
3. Dartmouth, 64
2012 - Princeton crushed it.
Team Scores
1. Princeton, 26
2. Columbia, 58
3. Dartmouth, 77
4. Cornell, 83
2011 - Princeton crushed it. Columbia kind of close.
Team Scores
1. Princeton, 37
2. Columbia, 51
3. Dartmouth, 79
4. Brown, 91
5. Cornell, 125
6. Yale, 162
7. Harvard, 184
8. Penn, 233
2010- Princeton crushed it.
Team Scores
1. Princeton, 33
2. Dartmouth, 55
3. Columbia, 94
4. Penn, 118
5. Cornell, 126
6. Harvard, 141
7. Yale, 149
8. Brown, 188
So in all of those years, there weren't a ton of teams realistically in the hunt.
This year, there were 5 teams under 100. Very tight. Almost six as Dartmouth had 103.
It will be interesting if Princeton gets back to its dominance as having Donn Cabral and Brian Leung totally changed those teams.