dukerdog wrote:
3. Your stories, that seem believable enough, but don't appear to have resulted in any real injuries or I'm sure you would have mentioned it.
In all honesty, I was attempting to race at the time. I saw people go down, in one case I saw a baby jogger turn over, since I didn't stop and render aid I can't say the extent of the injuries. I'll have to confess to being an asshole when my game face is on.
In the other cases I haven't seen a major injury but got the earfull second hand. Cuts and abrasions and somebody pissed off I hadn't done something about it. While I haven't been on the receiving end of a BJ incident I can say that those that have are certainly willing to let someone know how unhappy they are about about it. They apparently are the only people that read the disclaimers, since despite having signed them weeks before they can quote them back to me nearly word for word.
You may wonder how I know details of events I didn't always witness. If someone has a beef they ask "where's the RD" and they manage to give a detailed explaination of the issue, often at a decibel level that makes sure you're paying attention. Beleive it or not I try to pay attention; whether it's an errant baby jogger, kids (or boyfriends/girlfriends) cycling on the course, roller bladers, or when I'm trying to calm down the director of a program for terminal AIDS patients who's pissed people feel it's OK to not pay to participate. I also remember the incidents quite distinctly. I'm funny about things like that.
So call me an asshole, but I think the races I help organize should be free of hazards. I may not always succeed but I really try to make that possible. If I see something that introduces a hazard, be that a pothole in the road, a railroad crossing, construction debris, or a baby jogger, I try to keep that out of the event.
I could say, heck, only two people tops won't see that tilted sewer grate at Indiana and 32nd, no point putting out an extra cone or calling the city. The two people that trip over it probably won't be very fast and their injuries won't be major. What happens to them wouldn't be any worse than what would happen if they were elbowed at the start. Since the danger involved isn't any greater that what's introduced by allowing baby joggers, I should just ignore it, right?