currently suffering from a severe case of monkeypox
-
12
-
I’m glad I got the vax. No regrets 2.5 years later.
75 -
WeJo (1/3/22): If you start other threads related to the vaccine they will be deleted or merged with this one.
33 -
blowy wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The answer is quite simple: there are a lot of morons in American culture and many of them find their way to sites like these.
That makes sense
They got offended from pointing out the craziness
30 -
Here to say wrote:
I’m glad I got the vax. No regrets 2.5 years later.
Same. My friends who got 5-6 doses never got Covid in the first place.
43 -
DamagedGoods wrote:
DanM wrote:
Utterly bereft of any rationale to justify additional injections of mRNA goop, this is the vax mob mafia.
So what is the plan for Dr. Newname and Dr. Dan M to show the FDA they are dangerous and get the CDC to change its recommendations? If you don’t have a plan, can you stop posting misinformation?
I wonder 💭
31 -
Early on, there were reports of state medical licensing boards threatening disciplinary action toward doctors who didn't push covid vaccines. So whatever the percentage is, it's reasonable to be dubious as to whether or not that was ever their actual opinion.
But hey, those pharmaceutical megacorporations are totally trustworthy and just want to make people healthy, right?
35 -
DamagedGoods wrote:
DamagedGoods wrote:
So what is the plan for Dr. Newname and Dr. Dan M to show the FDA they are dangerous and get the CDC to change its recommendations? If you don’t have a plan, can you stop posting misinformation?
I wonder 💭
Please refer to my previous posts about the FDA budget and pharmaceutical companies.
14 -
DanM wrote:
DamagedGoods wrote:
I wonder 💭
Please refer to my previous posts about the FDA budget and pharmaceutical companies.
How do anti vax explain how drug safety measures led to pulling the J&J vaccine due to the rare risk of blood clots but still allowing mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna? If they didn’t look into drug safety enough and it was all about “big pharma” and/or the “establishment” with Fauci in on it somehow (even though he has nothing to do with which vaccines get approved), wouldn’t they have just approved any vaccine to come out?
32 -
Cl0wN wrote:
DanM wrote:
Please refer to my previous posts about the FDA budget and pharmaceutical companies.
How do anti vax explain how drug safety measures led to pulling the J&J vaccine due to the rare risk of blood clots but still allowing mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna? If they didn’t look into drug safety enough and it was all about “big pharma” and/or the “establishment” with Fauci in on it somehow (even though he has nothing to do with which vaccines get approved), wouldn’t they have just approved any vaccine to come out?
Tricky question given the fact that there is no such thing as a Covid vaccine.
16 -
Noyankee wrote:
Cl0wN wrote:
How do anti vax explain how drug safety measures led to pulling the J&J vaccine due to the rare risk of blood clots but still allowing mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna? If they didn’t look into drug safety enough and it was all about “big pharma” and/or the “establishment” with Fauci in on it somehow (even though he has nothing to do with which vaccines get approved), wouldn’t they have just approved any vaccine to come out?
Tricky question given the fact that there is no such thing as a Covid vaccine.
🤪
53 -
Cl0wN wrote:
DanM wrote:
Please refer to my previous posts about the FDA budget and pharmaceutical companies.
Hrgow do anti vax explain how drug safety measures led to pulling the J&J vaccine due to the rare risk of blood clots but still allowing mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna? If they didn’t look into drug safety enough and it was all about “big pharma” and/or the “establishment” with Fauci in on it somehow (even though he has nothing to do with which vaccines get approved), wouldn’t they have just approved any vaccine to come out?
How does the vax mob mafia explain the large decrease in the Covid-19 Infection Fatality Rate BEFORE the so called "vaccines" became available ?
April 2020: IFR 0.8%
December 2020 IFR 0.3%
Source: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
21 -
CDC now saying that the vaccinated are more at risk from new variants than the unvaccinated. If there were any honor in Fauci fans, they would take the L.
42 -
Here to say wrote:
I’m glad I got the vax. No regrets 2.5 years later.
No boosters?
13 -
DanM wrote:
DamagedGoods wrote:
I wonder 💭
Please refer to my previous posts about the FDA budget and pharmaceutical companies.
Maybe should look into how many dangerous and deadly drugs the FDA has approved for years at a time as well as all the $$ in fines paid by Big Pharma for their criminal behavior
44 -
DanM wrote:
How does the vax mob mafia explain the large decrease in the Covid-19 Infection Fatality Rate BEFORE the so called "vaccines" became available ?
April 2020: IFR 0.8%
December 2020 IFR 0.3%
Source: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Is that a serious question? In April 2020, the people most likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 were showing up in hospitals--mostly people who were very sick, in other words--because not much testing was being done outside of hospitals.
In December 2020, eight months later, testing was much more widespread and thus finding lots of people who were infected but not very sick--exactly the kind of infected people who would not have been identified in April. Come on now, this is basic stuff.
30 -
Safe and effective, y'all.💉💉💉💉💉
30 -
I took one VIOXX pill then threw them in the garbbage, 2 years later i found out those pills killed about 40,000 people and causes 100,000 heart attacks. I didn't follow the science, guess i'm an ANTIVIOXXER.
32 -
I'll let your history of posts guide me here.....
Something tells me that noyankee being anti vax means I should probably believe the other side
40 -
kibitzer wrote:
DanM wrote:
How does the vax mob mafia explain the large decrease in the Covid-19 Infection Fatality Rate BEFORE the so called "vaccines" became available ?
April 2020: IFR 0.8%
December 2020 IFR 0.3%
Source: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Is that a serious question? In April 2020, the people most likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 were showing up in hospitals--mostly people who were very sick, in other words--because not much testing was being done outside of hospitals.
In December 2020, eight months later, testing was much more widespread and thus finding lots of people who were infected but not very sick--exactly the kind of infected people who would not have been identified in April. Come on now, this is basic stuff.
You are talking about the case fatality rate.
I am talking about the infection fatality rate.
Come on now, this is basic stuff.
13
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.