This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Doctor loses his licence to practice after questioning the covid pandemic, yet another doctor KEEPS his job after refusing to see patients and then lying to cover himself. You couldn't make this **** up.
Tough time to be a vax lunatic. Look at the rats run. LMAO. ********* On October 1st, after a year of litigation, California conceded the inevitable and repealed California Assembly Bill 2098 (AB2098), the State’s blatantly unconstitutional attempt to censor the free speech of doctors throughout the state. The repeal comes on the heels of oral argument in McDonald v. Lawson, where the state faced an icy reception from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Liberty Justice Center filed McDonald v. Lawson in October 2022 to challenge AB2098, a law which empowered California bureaucrats to revoke physicians’ medical licenses for disagreeing with the State of California’s official beliefs about COVID-19. Under AB2098, a single instance of a doctor telling their patients a single piece of information the state disagreed with would be considered the equivalent of gross negligence and would allow the California Medical Board to revoke a physician’s license.
In early September, following the oral argument in McDonald, SB815—a preexisting bill to reauthorize the Medical Board of California—was quietly amended to include a repeal of AB2098. The repeal will take effect in January 2024. AB2098 had been criticized by civil liberties advocates from the beginning—even Governor Newsom, who signed the bill into law, attached a signing statement expressing “concern” about “the chilling effect” such laws can have.
The Liberty Justice Center argued that AB2098’s vague language—which would punish doctors for sharing “misinformation,” defined as anything contrary to the “contemporary scientific consensus”—threatened widespread medical censorship in violation of the First Amendment.
Chicago, IL—On October 1st, after a year of litigation, California conceded the inevitable and repealed California Assembly Bill 2098 (AB2098), the State’s blatantly unconstitutional attempt to censor the free speech of docto...
Tough time to be a vax lunatic. Look at the rats run. LMAO. ********* On October 1st, after a year of litigation, California conceded the inevitable and repealed California Assembly Bill 2098 (AB2098), the State’s blatantly unconstitutional attempt to censor the free speech of doctors throughout the state. The repeal comes on the heels of oral argument in McDonald v. Lawson, where the state faced an icy reception from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Liberty Justice Center filed McDonald v. Lawson in October 2022 to challenge AB2098, a law which empowered California bureaucrats to revoke physicians’ medical licenses for disagreeing with the State of California’s official beliefs about COVID-19. Under AB2098, a single instance of a doctor telling their patients a single piece of information the state disagreed with would be considered the equivalent of gross negligence and would allow the California Medical Board to revoke a physician’s license.
In early September, following the oral argument in McDonald, SB815—a preexisting bill to reauthorize the Medical Board of California—was quietly amended to include a repeal of AB2098. The repeal will take effect in January 2024. AB2098 had been criticized by civil liberties advocates from the beginning—even Governor Newsom, who signed the bill into law, attached a signing statement expressing “concern” about “the chilling effect” such laws can have.
The Liberty Justice Center argued that AB2098’s vague language—which would punish doctors for sharing “misinformation,” defined as anything contrary to the “contemporary scientific consensus”—threatened widespread medical censorship in violation of the First Amendment.
Hotez does not realize he is a pitiful sad sack of a man. Constantly stuff your face with burgers and fries then take one injection after another to compensate for poor lifestyle habits.
Vaxxers lose again. **********
Hotez conceded “I’m not as cautious about my diet as I should be — I’m a junk foodoholic.”
Rogan pledged to donate $100,000 to a charity of Hotez’s choosing if he agreed to the appear with the political scion, who has launched a longshot bid to dethrone President Biden in the 2024 …
Hotez does not realize he is a pitiful sad sack of a man. Constantly stuff your face with burgers and fries then take one injection after another to compensate for poor lifestyle habits.
Vaxxers lose again. **********
Hotez conceded “I’m not as cautious about my diet as I should be — I’m a junk foodoholic.”
Hotez does not realize he is a pitiful sad sack of a man. Constantly stuff your face with burgers and fries then take one injection after another to compensate for poor lifestyle habits.
Vaxxers lose again. **********
Hotez conceded “I’m not as cautious about my diet as I should be — I’m a junk foodoholic.”
The Pfizer COVID-19 "vaccine" injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer's clinical trials. There's been a "bait-and-switch."https://t.co/5ZnLwipqY2
