Ghost of Igloi wrote:
You are a very stupid person and a liar wrote:
Of course you would, because we're intelligent and not stupid liars like you are.
Your mother wears army boots.
My Mom has passed away, and has never worn army boots.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
You are a very stupid person and a liar wrote:
Of course you would, because we're intelligent and not stupid liars like you are.
Your mother wears army boots.
My Mom has passed away, and has never worn army boots.
I disagree .... wrote:
Christine Blasey Ford testified only about what happened to her, not about any other of the women who've come forth, and who have not been allowed to testify. In addition, (1) Christine Blasey Ford's testimony is credible, (2) others who've come forward have NOT been allowed to testify, (3) Mark Judge has not been called to testify and has not been investigated by the FBI, (4) a full FBI investigation has constantly been refused, (5) Kavanaugh has LIED about nearly everything all through the proceedings, and (6) he was extremely disrespectful to the women and men on the Judicial Committee, especially to the women.
Kavanaugh has zero credibility, and that the whole process has been a giant coverup of the MANY misdeeds he's committed is easy to see.
IMHO, to say that he is not a serial rapist of women and young girls is nuts.
However, even setting that aside, the many lies that he's told, and his angry disrespectful demeanor should cause him to be disqualified.
Bloody hell, talk about drawing a long bow with sweeping statements and no proof, tell me you're trolling and $hit stirring, please.
You cannot be serious, can you? wrote:
I disagree .... wrote:
Christine Blasey Ford testified only about what happened to her, not about any other of the women who've come forth, and who have not been allowed to testify. In addition, (1) Christine Blasey Ford's testimony is credible, (2) others who've come forward have NOT been allowed to testify, (3) Mark Judge has not been called to testify and has not been investigated by the FBI, (4) a full FBI investigation has constantly been refused, (5) Kavanaugh has LIED about nearly everything all through the proceedings, and (6) he was extremely disrespectful to the women and men on the Judicial Committee, especially to the women.
Kavanaugh has zero credibility, and that the whole process has been a giant coverup of the MANY misdeeds he's committed is easy to see.
IMHO, to say that he is not a serial rapist of women and young girls is nuts.
However, even setting that aside, the many lies that he's told, and his angry disrespectful demeanor should cause him to be disqualified.
Bloody hell, talk about drawing a long bow with sweeping statements and no proof, tell me you're trolling and $hit stirring, please.
Evidently cannot read information that is clearly in the public domain.
I disagree .... wrote:
However, even setting that aside, the many lies that he's told, and his angry disrespectful demeanor should cause him to be disqualified.
+1
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Evidently cannot read information that is clearly in the public domain.
0/10
wejo wrote:
The two guys who confessed wrote:
While republicans refuse to investigate true reporting.
What does their races have to do anything? The funny thing is most likely the poster is white. But it's now a sign of virtue signalling to slur white people.
Wejo, the person wrote “while” not “white”.
You are the one that injected when it wasn’t there.
Pretty funny.
I disagree .... wrote:
wejo wrote:
I don't have a lot of respect for people who say they know he is a "serial abuser rapist of women." It's totally unproven.
I disagree .... wrote:
You must not have been watching his testimony.
Personally I have zero respect for serial abuser rapists of women, nor for anyone who tries to cover up their misdeeds.
wejo wrote:
The testimony involved one incident of at the worst what attempted rape. To say you know he was a serial rapist of women is nuts. We don't know anything. If Avenatti's client 's claims were proven it would be true.
Again, if you don't know anything, then you must not have been watching his testimony.
Christine Blasey Ford testified only about what happened to her, not about any other of the women who've come forth, and who have not been allowed to testify. In addition, (1) Christine Blasey Ford's testimony is credible, (2) others who've come forward have NOT been allowed to testify, (3) Mark Judge has not been called to testify and has not been investigated by the FBI, (4) a full FBI investigation has constantly been refused, (5) Kavanaugh has LIED about nearly everything all through the proceedings, and (6) he was extremely disrespectful to the women and men on the Judicial Committee, especially to the women.
Kavanaugh has zero credibility, and that the whole process has been a giant coverup of the MANY misdeeds he's committed is easy to see.
IMHO, to say that he is not a serial rapist of women and young girls is nuts.
However, even setting that aside, the many lies that he's told, and his angry disrespectful demeanor should cause him to be disqualified.
1. Her testimony has not been corroborated.
2. That may have been the case; however, four witnesses: Mark Judge, Leland Keyser, PJ Smyth, and Deborah Ramirez will be questioned by the FBI
3. Incorrect. Judge has agreed to interviewed by the FBI.
4. A limited FBI investigation came into play with bi-partisan approval
5. Pure bias on your part.
6. If your name has been smeared all over the media and you could not defend yourself for over a week, you would be angry & ready to state your case forcefully at the first opportunity. No human is a robot without emotion.
To already convict him as a serial rapist of women and/or little girls is complete nonsense and shows a "lynch him now" mentality which is quite dangerous on your part. Wait until the FBI completes their current investigation before making an emotional knee-jerk conclusion.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
. . . a "lynch him now" mentality which is quite dangerous on your part.
It is not a "lynching" to say that Kavanaugh is not qualified to be a justice. He is a rambling wreck. He cannot work with others--only those who agree with his do-or-die positions. He attacks women. He is not qualified.
no danger wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
. . . a "lynch him now" mentality which is quite dangerous on your part.
It is not a "lynching" to say that Kavanaugh is not qualified to be a justice. He is a rambling wreck. He cannot work with others--only those who agree with his do-or-die positions. He attacks women. He is not qualified.
Wrong. His judicial record and history of promoting women to prestigious clerkships does not square with your assessment.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
no danger wrote:
It is not a "lynching" to say that Kavanaugh is not qualified to be a justice. He is a rambling wreck. He cannot work with others--only those who agree with his do-or-die positions. He attacks women. He is not qualified.
Reemphasized
wejo wrote:
At Yale I felt some of the professors really looked down on athletes and stereotyped them. The author of the piece does the same thing. Her implication is that sports jocks are all about drinking and sexual exploits.
Is it a stereotype if true? Geez his "calendar" is about lifting weights and drinking beer. He made that a large part of his testimony. Once again, your white male east coast bias comes shining through. This board is full of unchecked white privilege and misogyny...looks like it comes straight from the top
"wahhh....everyone is picking on jocks ,especially at Yale"
no danger wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Reemphasized
Doubling done on stupid, I see. It's ok to be wrong, but you are digging yourself into a ditch.
Honestly, I didn't like Kavanaugh's attitude during the hearing. Did he attack her? I don't know.
But now I just want to see him appointed to see the liberal tears.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Wrong. His judicial record and history of promoting women to prestigious clerkships does not square with your assessment.
Kavanaugh's judicial record is anti-woman. And he required women of a "certain look" to be a clerk.
harvey weinstien had a history of helping women too.
But keep trying.
yourXCrunner wrote:
Honestly, I didn't like Kavanaugh's attitude during the hearing. Did he attack her? I don't know.
But now I just want to see him appointed to see the liberal tears.
you seem mature.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Doubling done on stupid.
You are unqualified to offer an opinion.
Goood God wrote:
[quote]Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Wrong. His judicial record and history of promoting women to prestigious clerkships does not square with your assessment.
Kavanaugh's judicial record is anti-woman. And he required women of a "certain look" to be a clerk.
How has his record been anti-woman? How do you know for a fact that he "required women of a "certain look" to be a clerk." (that's your phrase, not mine -- and not proper English either).
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Your mother wears army boots.
No, but you're a rapist defender, and probably a rapist yourself.
Truth teller ,' wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Your mother wears army boots.
No, but you're a rapist defender, and probably a rapist yourself.
Your father wears army boots and joined the joined the #metoo movement thinking it was a male fraternity.
Truth teller ,' wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Your mother wears army boots.
No, but you're a rapist defender, and probably a rapist yourself.
You are just the kind of lawyer that Kim Jong Un needs. Presuming any and all accused as "guilty."
Move to NK.