TheyWontCare wrote:
I'm not sure that 'IdealFit UK' would be even slightly bothered...she has a reasonable chunk of social media sheep following her, she young(ish), has the 'girl next door' looks etc.
With her mouth closed, she doesn't look like a "girl next door". Doesn't she remind you of somebody from the Wizard of Oz? And I don't mean Dorothy.
Oz Heretic wrote:
TheyWontCare wrote:I'm not sure that 'IdealFit UK' would be even slightly bothered...she has a reasonable chunk of social media sheep following her, she young(ish), has the 'girl next door' looks etc.
With her mouth closed, she doesn't look like a "girl next door". Doesn't she remind you of somebody from the Wizard of Oz? And I don't mean Dorothy.
With her mouth open (apparently the default position) she looks thick as pig shite.
Have just been on their Facebook 53 in 53 & asked why she doesn't just enter an official ultra where officials are provided.
Someone else said surely technology nowadays could be used. Let's see if they respond to my request for Strava upload.
Expect the same crap I got on Rob Young page
ukathleticscoach wrote:
an official ultra where officials are provided.
Why are your ultras more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" ultra circuit that only exists to make money for its controllers.
And there were "officials" at Amy's world records, but Guinness decided one of them didn't meet their witness criteria.
Why are your ultras more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" ultra circuit that only exists to make money for its controllers.
And there were "officials" at Amy's world records, but Guinness decided one of them didn't meet their witness criteria.
Amy can run wherever she wants, like we can believe what Amy ran or not.
If you want to have proof you need witnesses. That's why races got invented.
I am looking forward to see Amy in a real 6 day race to confirm her running awesomeness.
Officially official wrote:
ukathleticscoach wrote:an official ultra where officials are provided.
Why are your ultras more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" ultra circuit that only exists to make money for its controllers.
And there were "officials" at Amy's world records, but Guinness decided one of them didn't meet their witness criteria.
There were no officials at her treadmill challenge.
Anyone can run where they want - doesn't make it a record. The Nike sub 2 attempt was not recognised as an official record. How come they can accept the rules but she can't.
Where is her Strava record for her 53 in 53? Every man and his dog is on it
Officially official wrote:
Why are your charities more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" charity circuit that only exists to make money for Amy and her mong boyfriend.
FIFY
Officially official wrote:
ukathleticscoach wrote:an official ultra where officials are provided.
Why are your ultras more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" ultra circuit that only exists to make money for its controllers.
And there were "officials" at Amy's world records, but Guinness decided one of them didn't meet their witness criteria.
The only person officiating at Amy's epic world records was Dave "thick as pig shit" Keighley. Amy's career as a stunt runner is finished and Idealfit UK are going to drop her like a stone when they find out that she is a lying cow.
ukathleticscoach wrote:
Have just been on their Facebook 53 in 53 & asked why she doesn't just enter an official ultra where officials are provided.
Someone else said surely technology nowadays could be used. Let's see if they respond to my request for Strava upload.
Expect the same crap I got on Rob Young page
I can't see your comment. Have they removed it and blocked you like they did to me?
I only politely asked to see the watch data or strava for the 53 marathons.
Comment immediately removed and blocked from page.
Got something to hide Amy and Dave?
Officially official wrote:
ukathleticscoach wrote:an official ultra where officials are provided.
Why are your ultras more "official" than others? Amy can run wherever she wants, w/o needing to sell herself to the "official" ultra circuit that only exists to make money for its controllers.
And there were "officials" at Amy's world records, but Guinness decided one of them didn't meet their witness criteria.
If Amy wants to just run for fun, she can indeed run wherever she likes and doesn't need to provide proof.
However - if you are going to claim you ran 53 marathons in order to collect 30 grand for her "charity" (where both her and Dave draw their WAGES from...) then you need to prove you did it.
She didn't.
As she didn't run 53 marathons.
Nor did she break the treadmill record nor were there proper INDEPENDANT witnesses for the record attempt, as the boyfriend was the main one and he fiddled the log book.
She has no history of running ultras so naturally people will doubt her ability when she doesn't provide proof of her own runs.
Not all ultras make money for the organiser. Many race directors are runners who put in hours organising for no profit when you take into consideration those hours worked.
If she is as good as the record suggests then any race organisers won't be making a penny out of her at their races. with such exceptional talent will be cleaning up when it comes to prize money.
Without any supporting evidence I call the 53 marathons in 53 days a complete fabrication and, the treadmill WR never happened.
If Amy and her support crew can share the data to say otherwise then please do so otherwise I, and many others will forever see your running feats as nothing but complete and utter nonsense.
I'm looking forward to her next stunt.
People like her really make my blood boil.
ukathleticscoach wrote:
I'm looking forward to her next stunt.
People like her really make my blood boil.
If she makes your blood boil then do something about it. Contact Idealfit UK with the evidence that she didn't run what she claims to have run. Explain to them what it will mean for their brand when she is discredited.
Post non-offensive requests on her Twitter asking if you can follow her on Strava and querying the progress of the GWR appeal.
Posting on letsrun is not going to stop your blood boiling.
Amy's running "career" is over.
If she would announce running another "record", people would come and have a closer look or run with her. She can't risk that since she can't run that long.
Do something about it wrote:
ukathleticscoach wrote:I'm looking forward to her next stunt.
People like her really make my blood boil.
If she makes your blood boil then do something about it. Contact Idealfit UK with the evidence that she didn't run what she claims to have run. Explain to them what it will mean for their brand when she is discredited.
Post non-offensive requests on her Twitter asking if you can follow her on Strava and querying the progress of the GWR appeal.
Posting on letsrun is not going to stop your blood boiling.
You are right there!
It's hard to prove someone didn't do something especially when it's in the past.
I've put a post on her Facebook page asking if she is on Strava. They just ignored it which shows they can't even pretend the fake indignation.
The key to all these fraudsters is their poor pbs.
A great 10k runner needs to be able to do a decent mile and a great ultra runner needs to be able to run a decent marathon.
Here are the stats for the genuine record holder. Note the impressive ultra runs and reasonable shorter distance times. Amy Hughes has not done one ultra run
http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=7861
Amy Hughes has posted a video on her Facebook celebrating the anniversary of her cheating and telling lies about her treadmill run. She clearly has no shame.
https://m.facebook.com/5353-Marathons-188981147892380/#
!/story.php?story_fbid=681692901954533&id=188981147892380
Check out the post below it before it's deleted!
ukathleticscoach wrote:
Check out the post below it before it's deleted!
either im blind or its gone. both are entirely possible.
either way you should have screenshotted it.