The American psychiatric Association is not a fan of the “diagnosis@ of agitated delirium. Here is their position paper on it
They note it is particularly used to explain deaths in police custody, and is particularly applied to black men.
The American psychiatric Association is not a fan of the “diagnosis@ of agitated delirium. Here is their position paper on it
They note it is particularly used to explain deaths in police custody, and is particularly applied to black men.
2600 bro wrote:
Yes that's their argument. Death is an acceptable outcome for any clash between normal citizens and overbearing "authority."
Armstronglivs wrote:
So you'd shoot 7 year-olds, too? Figures.
Death is acceptable outcome for stupid drug addicts and other morons that resist arrest by by armed law officers. In a way it is Darwinism in action.
Daunte Wright, wanted for illegal weapons and previously arrested for aggravated robbery.......
George Floyd wanted for this
Jacob Blake wanted for that
When they shoot Denzel Washington or Dr. Ben Carson worth any innocent law-abiding citizens please wake me up and I’ll pay attention.
Democrats lose again!!!
I totally agree, yep, Chauvin killed him so......2nd degree muder.
I mean at least you admit it. Training under the communists clearly took some of Christian Spirit out of you.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Yes that's their argument. Death is an acceptable outcome for any clash between normal citizens and overbearing "authority."
Death is acceptable outcome for stupid drug addicts and other morons that resist arrest by by armed law officers. In a way it is Darwinism in action.
2600 bro wrote:
I mean at least you admit it. Training under the communists clearly took some of Christian Spirit out of you.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Death is acceptable outcome for stupid drug addicts and other morons that resist arrest by by armed law officers. In a way it is Darwinism in action.
Mihaly Igloi defected from Hungary following the Russian Invasion.
Christian charity does not excuse blaming others for your own failings. Certainly degenerate behavior, where one craves the possessions of others, and are willing to steal to acquire them, goes against everything Christianity stands for.
So move on from your woke high horse. Many of us are very tired of this nonsense and unwilling to excuse it any longer.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Yes that's their argument. Death is an acceptable outcome for any clash between normal citizens and overbearing "authority."
Death is acceptable outcome for stupid drug addicts and other morons that resist arrest by by armed law officers. In a way it is Darwinism in action.
If so, then the outlook isn't very good for you.
wazzu1452 wrote:
Daunte Wright, wanted for illegal weapons and previously arrested for aggravated robbery.......
George Floyd wanted for this
Jacob Blake wanted for that
When they shoot Denzel Washington or Dr. Ben Carson worth any innocent law-abiding citizens please wake me up and I’ll pay attention.
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
I mean at least you admit it. Training under the communists clearly took some of Christian Spirit out of you.
Mihaly Igloi defected from Hungary following the Russian Invasion.
Christian charity does not excuse blaming others for your own failings. Certainly degenerate behavior, where one craves the possessions of others, and are willing to steal to acquire them, goes against everything Christianity stands for.
So move on from your woke high horse. Many of us are very tired of this nonsense and unwilling to excuse it any longer.
Thou shalt not kill seems pretty clear to me.
Armstronglivs wrote:
wazzu1452 wrote:
Daunte Wright, wanted for illegal weapons and previously arrested for aggravated robbery.......
George Floyd wanted for this
Jacob Blake wanted for that
When they shoot Denzel Washington or Dr. Ben Carson worth any innocent law-abiding citizens please wake me up and I’ll pay attention.
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
Police have always been the executioners of the government. They are the violence which enforces the power of state. Sometimes that violence results in death. We attempt to minimize how much death the police bring, and enable nonviolent defense mechanisms, but the police have always been the harbingers of death. It is their first and primary function. Every law is backed by violence and police are that violence.
2600 bro wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Mihaly Igloi defected from Hungary following the Russian Invasion.
Christian charity does not excuse blaming others for your own failings. Certainly degenerate behavior, where one craves the possessions of others, and are willing to steal to acquire them, goes against everything Christianity stands for.
So move on from your woke high horse. Many of us are very tired of this nonsense and unwilling to excuse it any longer.
Thou shalt not kill seems pretty clear to me.
Thou shall not steal. In the process if you are killed, that is on you. A society with laws is far better than the unrealistic woke world you live in. One only to get worse before you fools see your folly.
Meanwhile in Brooklyn, MN brave youth rescue sneakers at risk of arson attack.
https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status/1381486438148141057?s=20POW wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
Police have always been the executioners of the government. They are the violence which enforces the power of state. Sometimes that violence results in death. We attempt to minimize how much death the police bring, and enable nonviolent defense mechanisms, but the police have always been the harbingers of death. It is their first and primary function. Every law is backed by violence and police are that violence.
Talk about a woke ignoramus.
2600 bro wrote:
pupil3142 doesn't even live in America!
Thoughts?
correct.
Are you saying the us is no longer the leader of the free world?
POW wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
Police have always been the executioners of the government. They are the violence which enforces the power of state. Sometimes that violence results in death. We attempt to minimize how much death the police bring, and enable nonviolent defense mechanisms, but the police have always been the harbingers of death. It is their first and primary function. Every law is backed by violence and police are that violence.
The police are not an extension of government power; they are separate from it. They are not "executioners". Their role is to enforce and uphold the law that applies to all citizens. It's just that in the US some of them seem to have forgotten that.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
POW wrote:
Police have always been the executioners of the government. They are the violence which enforces the power of state. Sometimes that violence results in death. We attempt to minimize how much death the police bring, and enable nonviolent defense mechanisms, but the police have always been the harbingers of death. It is their first and primary function. Every law is backed by violence and police are that violence.
Talk about a woke ignoramus.
Not woke. Just an ignoramus.
Armstronglivs wrote:
wazzu1452 wrote:
Daunte Wright, wanted for illegal weapons and previously arrested for aggravated robbery.......
George Floyd wanted for this
Jacob Blake wanted for that
When they shoot Denzel Washington or Dr. Ben Carson worth any innocent law-abiding citizens please wake me up and I’ll pay attention.
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
The cops all acted very calmly and cordially until those they were questioning or attempting to arrest resisted. This is so obvious and it's too bad you don't want to face up to those simple facts.
Not CNN wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
At what point was it decided that the police could be executioners of those we disapprove of?
The cops all acted very calmly and cordially until those they were questioning or attempting to arrest resisted. This is so obvious and it's too bad you don't want to face up to those simple facts.
The police have no authority to use deadly force unless their lives are threatened - or those of others. Resisting arrest are not grounds for killing anyone.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Not CNN wrote:
The cops all acted very calmly and cordially until those they were questioning or attempting to arrest resisted. This is so obvious and it's too bad you don't want to face up to those simple facts.
The police have no authority to use deadly force unless their lives are threatened - or those of others. Resisting arrest are not grounds for killing anyone.
The point is the cops were not acting as executioners, and no force would ever need to be used if people would follow simple commands an not resist. Why do you keep avoiding that actuality?
whats happening today? No opportunity to watch.