You didn't read or understand either of those Indictments. They both exist.
Neither case has been to trial.
The second indictment has been superseded. Your document is defunct.
Doesn't matter if the FIRST indictment was superseded. I was responding to a halfwit's question about what crime Trump has committed. Some of the crimes he has committed are set forth in the two Indictments I posted. If you or the other half-wit read those documents, you will have a good sense of some of the crimes that Trump has committed.
Russell Brand? Really? You've got a thing for serial sexual abusers.
The usual attack the platform and ignore the content such as the CNN interview and what the Gold Star mother had to say about Trump's visit to the cemetery.
You probably think the Israeli govt is a source of truth
The second indictment has been superseded. Your document is defunct.
Doesn't matter if the FIRST indictment was superseded. I was responding to a halfwit's question about what crime Trump has committed. Some of the crimes he has committed are set forth in the two Indictments I posted. If you or the other half-wit read those documents, you will have a good sense of some of the crimes that Trump has committed.
No crimes. Lawfare by the Deep State. We are now officially a 3rd world nation that jails political opponents
This post was edited 12 minutes after it was posted.
The second indictment has been superseded. Your document is defunct.
Doesn't matter if the FIRST indictment was superseded. I was responding to a halfwit's question about what crime Trump has committed. Some of the crimes he has committed are set forth in the two Indictments I posted. If you or the other half-wit read those documents, you will have a good sense of some of the crimes that Trump has committed.
And because you're an idiot you don't understand that an indictment isn't evidence of a crime it's just an accusation.
If you say so, legal eagle. But anyway, THIS right here -- "The jury was incorrectly instructed that Cohen being guilty of a crime meant Trump was guilty of the same crime" -- is a lie. That's you lying at Post #3835 on page 192.
That never happened. That jury instruction never happened. You lied about it. You even appear to know where the actual jury instructions are located and you STILL lied about it. Do you know how fvcked up and weird that is?
If you weren't an imbecile and you had actually followed the trial you would understand why I'm correct.
Alas, you remain dumber than a box of sh*t.
"Although you must conclude unanimously that the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you need not be unanimous as to what those unlawful means were. In determining whether the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you may consider the following unlawful means: (1) violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act otherwise known as FECA; (2) the falsification of other business records; or (3) violation of tax laws."
There was no violation of FECA.
The judge lied and you have been lying about this for weeks now because you're an idiot.
I addressed most of what you are struggling to say at Post #10586 on page 530. That was in response to a poster named "impartial observer" who quickly fled the scene.
None of that has anything to do with the lie you posted on Page 192 at post #3835. Here it is again, to remind you:
1. YOU posted "The jury was incorrectly instructed that Cohen being guilty of a crime meant Trump was guilty of the same crime." Page 192, Post #3835.
Silver is now publishing his own independent forecast at Silver Bulletin, and for most of August, the model aligned with polls, showing Harris as a slight favorite. But beginning last Thursday, Silver Bulletin showed Trump taking a slight edge. As of midday Tuesday, it gave Trump a 56.7 percent chance to win the election. That’s despite Silver Bulletin’s polling averages showing Harris with narrow edges in most swing states.
If you weren't an imbecile and you had actually followed the trial you would understand why I'm correct.
Alas, you remain dumber than a box of sh*t.
"Although you must conclude unanimously that the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you need not be unanimous as to what those unlawful means were. In determining whether the defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means, you may consider the following unlawful means: (1) violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act otherwise known as FECA; (2) the falsification of other business records; or (3) violation of tax laws."
There was no violation of FECA.
The judge lied and you have been lying about this for weeks now because you're an idiot.
I addressed most of what you are struggling to say at Post #10586 on page 530. That was in response to a poster named "impartial observer" who quickly fled the scene.
None of that has anything to do with the lie you posted on Page 192 at post #3835. Here it is again, to remind you:
1. YOU posted "The jury was incorrectly instructed that Cohen being guilty of a crime meant Trump was guilty of the same crime." Page 192, Post #3835.
2. THAT never happened.
3. YOU are a liar.
Are you dumb?
When you tell the jury they can consider FECA crimes you are literally instructing the jury that Michael Cohen pleading guilty to a FECA crime means Trump was guilty of the same crime.
The Laughing Hyena is now campaigning in the blue states of NH, VA, and MN. Why? Because her internal polls are showing they ain’t so blue in 2024!
Trump’s on the offense & will be talking to the audience at the Town Hall tonight. Chicken-mala won't since she fears being unscripted, fears a conservative media outlet & runs away. She's a coward.
Cackles is on the defense and her campaign is collapsing. Trump will deliver the knockout punch on debate night. It's OVER, Hyena-nettes!
#FTLH
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.
Convicted of 34 counts of felony falsifying business records for starters.
Labeling payments to a lawyer as legal expenses.
That's a fake crime and even if Trump's accountant did this it is a very minor misdemeanor.
Just because Cohen happened to be a lawyer, doesn't make the reimbursements that Trump paid him "legal expenses".
If Michael Cohen went over the local Buick dealership and bought Trump a nice new car, and then Trump reimbursed him, it would not be a "legal expense". It would be "reimbursement for a new Trump-mobile." For some reason Trump didn't want, "Reimbursement for hush money to porn actress" in his business records though, so he went with "legal expense".
wild that m'agas still think trump isn't a criminal.
good gawd the blindness.
Fight, m'agas. Fight to get out of the orange goo and see the light. Like just about everyone who has worked with Trump in government has already done.
For example, why do you think you know more than Mike Pence about Trump's fitness to serve?
“To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.” George Orwell
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
You are acting suspiciously like Carmine/Newman with that "question."
On this previous page, I posted two links reciting in detail some of the felonies that Trump has committed. See Post #12001 on Page 601. That was even in response to one of your posts.
Doesn't matter if the FIRST indictment was superseded. I was responding to a halfwit's question about what crime Trump has committed. Some of the crimes he has committed are set forth in the two Indictments I posted. If you or the other half-wit read those documents, you will have a good sense of some of the crimes that Trump has committed.
And because you're an idiot you don't understand that an indictment isn't evidence of a crime it's just an accusation.
You remain a f*cking moron.
Like how you supported your statement that "Democrats cheat" buy posting an article about how a Republican special counsel called for voter fraud charges against the Republicans on the Wisconsin election commission?
You remain the biggest f*cking moron on the internet.
I addressed most of what you are struggling to say at Post #10586 on page 530. That was in response to a poster named "impartial observer" who quickly fled the scene.
None of that has anything to do with the lie you posted on Page 192 at post #3835. Here it is again, to remind you:
1. YOU posted "The jury was incorrectly instructed that Cohen being guilty of a crime meant Trump was guilty of the same crime." Page 192, Post #3835.
2. THAT never happened.
3. YOU are a liar.
Are you dumb?
When you tell the jury they can consider FECA crimes you are literally instructing the jury that Michael Cohen pleading guilty to a FECA crime means Trump was guilty of the same crime.
And because you're an idiot you don't understand that an indictment isn't evidence of a crime it's just an accusation.
You remain a f*cking moron.
Like how you supported your statement that "Democrats cheat" buy posting an article about how a Republican special counsel called for voter fraud charges against the Republicans on the Wisconsin election commission?
You remain the biggest f*cking moron on the internet.
WE know for a fact the Dems cheated Bernie in 2016 thanks to Wikileaks.
When you tell the jury they can consider FECA crimes you are literally instructing the jury that Michael Cohen pleading guilty to a FECA crime means Trump was guilty of the same crime.
