Kronos wrote:
Chronology? wrote:Exactly. Which is a question. To which another poster then replied with the ESPN article. To which I said does not indicate anything about Kara Goucher's relationship with Brown. Which is exactly what you wrote. C'mon. Think.
It makes no difference who introduce who to whom. Only abuse of drugs or prescriptions by a coach or an athlete matter.
^THIS
Gelling like felon wrote:
Senior Software Engineer wrote:Well, whatever was discussed so far lacked any evidence. Just a bunch of finger pointing and accusations amounting to an ongoing witch hunt.
Of course. Only a crazy witch hunter could think that Salazar experimenting with testosterone gel to learn how much could be applied before triggering a positive test could be evidence of doping. No doubt that's the sort of thing all respected and upstanding coaches do routinely.
Would it surprise you to learn that Sakazar received sabotage threats inspired by wing nuts on LRC?
reader of the forums 2.0 wrote:
They're currently under investigation by USADA.
A person smart enough to pay attention.
One thought, it's clear from past interviews that Salazar was regularly having everything checked by USADA for compliance.
Cynics and jealous folks from lower income brackets make up stories in their heads out of jealousy and jealousy of not reaching their goals and economic security in the sport...
In agreement wrote:
One thought, it's clear from past interviews that Salazar was regularly having everything checked by USADA for compliance.
The oldest cheater trick in the book. Most illegal businesses operate with legit businesses as fronts.
Only someone with something to hide asks for regular checks for things they know they will usually get okays for. That person never asks for checks for things they don't want known.
rojo wrote:
I have reason to believe that things are still ongoing. ... I expect we'll hear something in early 2016.
Bump. Early 2016 has come and gone Mr. Rojo. Nothing. There's no evidence of wrongdoing here. When are we going to admit we were all punked by David Epstein and Kara Goucher?
Seriously. How does anyone take Goucher as credible?
It was all a Brojo click bait hullabaloo .
When nutsy Jon Steiner is your inside source....
On to the next click bait.
"testosterone medication" not "testosterone"That is the source of ambiguity.
webby wrote:
What strikes you as ambiguous about a chart that says Rupp is on testosterone
Clock tower Pumpkin wrote:
It was all a Brojo click bait hullabaloo .
When nutsy Jon Steiner is your inside source....
On to the next click bait.
Except that Salazar admitted that he had testosterone gel at training camp and that he had Stiner retrieve it from the room Salazar and Rupp shared.
And how is it clickbait when Salazar admits he conducted experiments with testosterone cream to see how much could be applied without triggering a positive result?
Salazar's explanations might be true or not, but the things that Salazar admits happened with testosterone cream deserve to be investigated and Salazar's explanations examined.
US track can hardly retain any credibility if one of its top coaches can run testosterone experiments and USATF or USADA pretend it never happened.