Dial it up wrote:
No Way wrote:This is obviously a concern, but what will stop it from happening?
What will stop it from happening is libs will stop trying to change all of society just to accomodate a rare few.
If you have a dick, go in the men's.
If you have a vagina, go in the women's.
If you have a big problem with this, change at home.
That only stops males from looking at females and females from looking at males.
There are exceptions to every rule.
No Way wrote:
Dial it up wrote:What will stop it from happening is libs will stop trying to change all of society just to accomodate a rare few.
If you have a dick, go in the men's.
If you have a vagina, go in the women's.
If you have a big problem with this, change at home.
That only stops males from looking at females and females from looking at males.
In American culture, I'm pretty sure thats what we're going for with the whole separate locker room thing.
But it doesn't stop creeps from looking at kids.
dial it up wrote:
No Way wrote:That only stops males from looking at females and females from looking at males.
In American culture, I'm pretty sure thats what we're going for with the whole separate locker room thing.
Creeps are everywhere my friend. If you want to try to use policy to keep creeps away from public places you are going to be fighting a battle with no end.
dial it up wrote:
Creeps are everywhere my friend. If you want to try to use policy to keep creeps away from public places you are going to be fighting a battle with no end.
That's my point exactly.
know the difference wrote:
xyz1 wrote:+1 million. End thread.
-1 million. That is sex, not gender.
I guess this is my confusion - aren't bathrooms and locker rooms divided by sex?
Dial it up wrote:
There are few outliers like that. But a RARE few.
I'd say a good rule to go with is if there is a penis anywhere in your arsenal, you role with the dudes.
The numbers indicate there are 1 or 2 for every 100 births. I guess that's rare, but it still translates into millions in the US alone.
Get used to it.. wrote:
If you did your research you would discover it isn't BS, but it is great you are so confident. Too bad you are ignorant.
LEONARD SMALLS wrote:right - legitimizing the ridiculous fraud that is transgendered gender identity BS by favoring a 3rd set of rest rooms is a "good idea", but then you object to boys who claim to identify as girls playing on girls sports teams. This is the problem - a lack of intellectual depth, basically a confident ignorance - that allows people to make stupid decisions & not think things through.. If you recognize gender identity as legit, you can't put the gender queer genie back in it's closet, dumbas$
Research? Research?? Have we slouched our way down so far that people seriously believe "research" is needed to fuc&ing determine whether a girl is a girl and a boy a boy? What the Fuc& is wrong with us that we actually take seriously the idea that you can switch genders whenever you like, based on how you feel?
Who writes this Fuc&ing research? Some skinny jean wearing homo college kid gender studies major? We're actually listening - and taking serious - the lunatics on this.
And yeah, I know - I'm a bigoted homophobe Fox News watching Republican racist, blah, blah, blah...
Dial it up wrote:
What if I feel I identify as a dog? Can I take a shit on your lawn? A penis is a penis
I thought you had a different opinion of this according to your studies?
His "studies" was actually only one paper that he linked twice from an anti-circumcision web site.
Yeah, I posted a link earlier. Too bad it is probably too real for your closed-mindedness and ignorance. I will post it again.You can find the first one on your own if you are inclined. I will post this link with even more information.http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20032-transsexual-differences-caught-on-brain-scan.html#.VQHFe3bD-Uk
LEONARD SMALLS wrote:
Get used to it.. wrote:If you did your research you would discover it isn't BS, but it is great you are so confident. Too bad you are ignorant.
Research? Research?? Have we slouched our way down so far that people seriously believe "research" is needed to fuc&ing determine whether a girl is a girl and a boy a boy? What the Fuc& is wrong with us that we actually take seriously the idea that you can switch genders whenever you like, based on how you feel?
Who writes this Fuc&ing research? Some skinny jean wearing homo college kid gender studies major? We're actually listening - and taking serious - the lunatics on this.
And yeah, I know - I'm a bigoted homophobe Fox News watching Republican racist, blah, blah, blah...
Um, it is a HUGE what if. Like, there has to be a 12 year old in the locker room at the same time, the transgendered person has to want to look, the 12 y/o would be at a state of undress that would make people look. How is this any different than men changing in locker rooms with little boys. There are male sexual predators too that like boys. Stop that why don't ya?
used to it.. wrote:
Get used to it.. wrote:And your 12 year old daughter could be shot by her bus driver but you trust him to so the right thing. Every day we all trust others around us to do the right thing. You can't account for every "what if".
This is not some random "what if". Sure a bus driver could shoot a child, but they run background checks to try and avoid such an occurrence. What I don't trust is grown men in a changing room with young girls; this is just asking for trouble.
Bunch of old timers here apparently. For the record, school age girls no longer get undressed in locker rooms. And they haven't done so for decades. Try to keep up.
The hooded Wang wrote:
Dial it up wrote:What if I feel I identify as a dog? Can I take a shit on your lawn? A penis is a penis
I thought you had a different opinion of this according to your studies?
So pointing out a fact that most women think uncircumcised penises are smelly and disgusting means there is no difference between having a penis or not having a penis? Nice, people like you make my work here so easy.
Planet Fitness insider wrote:
We now have a picture of this transgendered person who was the reason for the complaints...
http://goo.gl/WgISw
That's no moon! It's a space station!
Anyway... It sounds like Planet Fitness could avoid any controversy just by having a few lockers out in the hall, which would probably be good for lots of people who don't like dressing rooms or just show up dressed to exercise and then drive home. Problem solved.
Fido fan wrote:
Dial it up wrote:What if I feel I identify as a dog? Can I take a shit on your lawn? A penis is a penis
Huh? Do dogs shit on your lawn? Where do you live that allows that?
Not in Clint's neighborhood!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelBNtNm8l0But seriously, the seed of this sort of kerfuffle was planted by Title IX.
ScaryStuff wrote:But seriously, the seed of this sort of kerfuffle was planted by Title IX.
How so? Single sex bathrooms long ante-date Title IX. Issues of how you fit transgender people into a binary definition of the sexes exist in every country, not just the US where Title IX is the law. Title IX also has no application to a private gym.
Dial it up wrote:
The hooded Wang wrote:I thought you had a different opinion of this according to your studies?
So pointing out a fact that most women think uncircumcised penises are smelly and disgusting means there is no difference between having a penis or not having a penis? Nice, people like you make my work here so easy.
Not everyone here is an idiot. Many of us won't fall for your made up "facts".