Sprintgeezer wrote:
I repeat also:
The absolute hallmark of doping is continued stratospheric performance level, in elite competition.
It simply cannot be sustained naturally.
Armstrong, Merritt, Bolt, whatever.
That was a terribly bad, unsourced generalizations with terribly bad examples and you should feel terribly bad
"I never called you fat." His brain works differently, that's for sure, he said he went on 2 out of 3 true, not a "fat crazy bitch." Psycho.
rojo wrote:
Why is Lance so adamant he didn't make others dope? Is that part tied to his lifetime ban?
Well he was charged with trafficking. Not admitting that is not going to get his ban reduced.
rojo wrote:
why do you give hundreds of thousands of dollars to a group "you are not a fan of?"
Why do you continue to post on a website that isn't a fan of you?
On the other hand, I'm not going to feel sympathy for the doper and the doper's wife (Frankie and Betsy Andreu). At least in relation to this whole issue that mostly is about sports. Armstrong is not an admitted doper, just like Frankie. They are pretty much equals in that regard.
The interview - based on this thread - sounds quite uneventful.
that was hilarious!
you're a crazy, bitch, whore... but you're not fat.
Wow--Lance defends self re Betsy Andreu by saying well, at least I never called her fat...And he says this in his defense when being interviewed by OPRAH.
The guy is tone deaf.
Please explain why you care if an age grouper is banned in 2013? Jealous or bitter much?
agip wrote:
Old Man by the Sea wrote:There is nothing to the guy. He is incapable of feeling true remorse. He is empty.
that's the thing - he isn't doing this out of remorse - he is doing it so he can compete again. Just another thing he has to do to get back in the race.
Probably the best thing for LA as a person would be a lifetime ban. Then he has to think about who he is and what he can do in real life.
Hey, if michael milken can recreate himself in a different field so can LA.
WHy wouldn't lance admit to Andrew hospital lie?
Lawyers clearly told him not to for some reason as he didn't deny it?
I wish Oprah had played the whore comment. Not sure if I've ever heard it.
If he started using in 1995, how many of you think this actually caused his cancer?
Was really hoping we'd find out the truth from hospital room with Betsy. Oh wel...
RuKiddingMe!! wrote:
why does it matter if he doped after 2005 or not?
Well, it matters if you think his credibility is important or not.
He really regrets coming back, because if he hadn't, "we wouldn't be here."
His only regret is that he got caught.
How typical.
Will Oprah ask about Lemond ? Of course not.
rojo wrote:
I know many think I'm over the top with my hatred of Lance, but the more I think about him going after people with lawsuits who are telling the truth, the more I think it's even worse than I imagine.
WHat a psycopath.
Not psychosis.
Federal prosecutors dropped the case.
You know why?
One word:
Bush.
kasjkajl wrote:
So it seems to be a problem for him to have paid off the UCI in the tour de Suisse. That's all the way back in 2001. Why is this a legal problem? That's 12 years ago. Switzerland has a longer look back period? Lawyer anywhere here?
Lol. Are Swiss secret agents going to break into Texas and abduct him?
Thats what I was thinking.
Love how he had to go to East Germany in the 70s/80s to compare his program.