Night Runner wrote:
I'm missing something on this whole "shirt" thing. I grew up in FL and attended schools here - we always ran without a shirt when it was hot...
Despite the temperature differences, this is the kind of story I'd expect to see in FL, at least the northern parts, rather than anywhere in the Northeast, except that in the South it wouldn't just be the A.D. yowling about the evils of shirtlessness, it would be the parents and every pastor in sight, although there would also be a huge double standard between boys and girls. Some of the bumpkins down here would rather see girls run in full gowns than in any kind of shorts.
Hell, when I coached high school (boys and girls) I usually ran with the team and often went shirtless myself off campus (and when with the boys only) and no one said shit. Shirtless people running is just something most people don't flinch at seeing when it's balls hot or even when it's merely mild.
What's stupid about some of the posts here is that the very people calling for an organized insurrection (e.g., other teams ditching their shirts or skipping practice) are in some cases saying that the kids doing things like "kind of" wearing shirts in an obviously defiant way were out of bounds. That doesn't make such sense.
Only thing thats' clear to me -- and I admit I'm only on page three of this crap -- is that regardless of the character and behavior of Tom Davis, the A.D. at that school should be out on his ass as of several years ago. Certain people employed by school districts -- a select few who never seem to be teachers, only administrators -- are given exalted and obviously protected status in the face of behavior that is not only egregious but borderline criminal. If Westwood wants to escape this with any dignity it will remove the turd from the scholastic punch bowl.