You are so stupid you don't understand what 24 years mean.
Yet the only thing you can comment on now is my posts. Your devotion is quite over the top. You need to find another interest in life.
Wrong again. I have posted on several threads today, interacted with different people. Only your narcissistic ego thinks I would only reply to you. Check yourself in into a mental institution, for your own good.
Yet the only thing you can comment on now is my posts. Your devotion is quite over the top. You need to find another interest in life.
Wrong again. I have posted on several threads today, interacted with different people. Only your narcissistic ego thinks I would only reply to you. Check yourself in into a mental institution, for your own good.
Wrong again. I have posted on several threads today, interacted with different people. Only your narcissistic ego thinks I would only reply to you. Check yourself in into a mental institution, for your own good.
And you don't understand that that is not me saying she is doping. You are beyond stupid now.
But it was your post and you weren't quoting anyone. How long have you been having these voices in your head?
I suggest you join one of those classes for illiterate senior citizens. Instead of wasting your life posting here, you could be learning English instead.
I think that a top 10 finish is a challenging, but realistic goal for Valby. With so many runners getting caught doping, she could move up from 7th to bronze over the next few years when dopers get their medals stripped.
I think a 15:07 or better close is possible in a slow race since she seems to have learned to hang back and relax at the pro level.
15.07 is near what she might run for 5k and you think she can close a 10k at that pace. Unbelievable.
How is top 10 realistic when she is ranked about 80 in the world? You do realise that the top 10 runners are all at least a minute faster than her over the distance? Her international experience is basically zero and you think she can be amongst the best in the toughest international competition. There is a huge jump between national trials and a global final.
20 women in the world have run a faster 10000M than Valby this year. 10 of them are Kenyan, 6 Ethiopian. They obviously can’t all run in the Olympics.
The others who have run faster than Valby this year:
Chelangat - UGA 30:24
Kelati - USA 30:33
Ryan - AUS 30:35
Keith - GBR 30:36
That’s it….
I don’t even know whether all 4 of those women are entered, but no matter how you slice it, your post is factually incorrect. The convoluted “world ranking” has her at #35 in the 10000M.
Link to list of the fastest women in the world this year.
Valby won't be able to compete with Battocletti either. Time is irrelevant,
They’re fairly close across the board. The have comparable PBs in both the 3000M and 10000M. Battocletti has the edge for 5000M, and is 3 years older, and more experienced, which could give her the edge. I don’t think anyone would be shocked if Valby beat her, do you?
Battocletti will be doubling the 5/10. I think Valby should run in a manner that gives her the best chance of lowering her PB; that probably means a bit of negative split between the first half and second half.
If the East Africans slow it down, we may see Parker out leading the train for a spell. She’s capable of doing that, per past experiences.
