Shakira Richardson loses 3 in a row

The Clown Show wrote:

DietBacon wrote:

Yeah she wouldn't be talking sh1t like she was if she'd stopped training I would think

For me, this is the most puzzling part of this whole situation. She was so outspoken and publicly confident in what she was about to do at Prefontaine and I have a hard time believing she didn't know that she wasn't ready (mentally, physically etc). Whether its because she didn't train hard, or she wasn't on the enhancers she was previously on .... whatever. She was SO sure she was about to do something big.

Hence why I don't buy her act. None of this is real. She's not a confident person at all. Quite the opposite. She's been overcompensating this whole time. It's all false bravado.

Someone who sees the big picture.

She’s used to talking big, because she’s been blowing the field away since high school, winning races is probably a huge part of her self-esteem especially when you consider her background.

Now she’s in the big leagues and she can’t afford to switch up and act scared, so she’s just doing what she’s comes naturally. Talking smack to hype herself up and project confidence, and intimidate her opponents.

If you take away her athletic ability, who is she really? She probably doesn’t even know who she is, besides being an athlete.

It’s not fooling anyone with real world experience. It’s definitely not fooling the Jamaicans.

pupil3142 wrote:

rojo togurt wrote:

The clean vs. doped times that you’re speculating are absurdly wide spreads. Victor Conte, who knows much more about doping athletes than you do (unless there’s a confession you need to make, geezer, for the sake of clean sport, in which case I would be happy to hand you over to authorities), calculates that in the 100 the dope creates a maximum difference of .2 for men snd .4 for women. .

yes, i hope that VC knows more about doping than SG. But why would he tell the truth? It is in the interests of doping coaches to make their products seem just about worthwhile to the outside world and not divulge their true significance.

Well, you’re assuming that SG isn’t an insider himself. Do we know if he was connected w/ Charlie Francis? What are the odds that he would be this deeply involved in the Canadian sprint scene since the 80s as a white guy hanger-on and not have anything to do w/ that drug pusher? I’m not saying it’s the case, just asking questions that are out there.

Sprintgeezer wrote:

Conte knows some stuff, but his info is outdated.

As far as roids go, I saw what he saw, only earlier than he did. Roids are now only part of the deal, and are done differently than back in the day. There is a much newer stack now.

Gay was nothing. He would be 10.3 on the circuit, 10.2 at his PB, maybe 10.1x-high, maybe once or twice in his life. MAYBE. Women easily gain 0.50 these days, some more. SCR is no better than 11.3 clean.

re: "Gay was nothing. He would be 10.3 on the circuit, 10.2 at his PB, maybe 10.1x-high, maybe once or twice in his life. MAYBE. Women easily gain 0.50 these days, some more. SCR is no better than 11.3 clean."

Please tell me that you are joking or someone highjacked your account?

Sha'Carri Richarson will be back next season faster than ever. However, expect many of the collegiate graduates to make a huge impact on the track as well.