This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Are you sure the underlying input is correct set for what he is trying to look into? My guess is there is a misunderstanding as to how deaths are recorded to the medical examiner and government and this is part of the grift - this misunderstanding has been a big reason for misinformation with otherwise smart people, and this is the reason he able to pull magic out of the underlying data, and so basically, this guy without a professor job just wasted his time writing 500 pages since the underlying data inputted isn’t anything that can be relied upon for what he is trying to show.
I thought it already broke but the message you’re trying to get out about vaccines being dangerous seems to only stay within small alt right circles. Do you know why that is?
I thought it already broke but the message you’re trying to get out about vaccines being dangerous seems to only stay within small alt right circles. Do you know why that is?
What percentage are still getting boosters? I forget.
“5) Incorrectly Assuming All Reports Are Serious Finally, another misconception is the incorrect notion that all reports in VAERS are serious. Again, part of this hinges on the use of technical language. “ Advers e event” sounds serious to many people, but it includes minor incidents, such as a sore arm. Less than 10% to 15% of U.S. reports in VAERS are considered “serious” — a regulatory term that means the event was life-threatening or involved hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization if someone was already hospitalized, persistent disability, a birth defect, death, or required medical attention to prevent one of these outcomes. The CDC requests follow-up information for all serious reports, which, like their non-serious counterparts, may be entirely coincidental. As the CDC explains, while serious events happen after vaccination, “they are rarely caused by the vaccine.””
For decades, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, has been exploited by people opposed to vaccination. Here, we’ll explain how VAERS works and run through five misconceptions that anti-vaccination activists...
I thought it already broke but the message you’re trying to get out about vaccines being dangerous seems to only stay within small alt right circles. Do you know why that is?
What percentage are still getting boosters? I forget.
I think most do not care anymore because the public emergency is over. However, anyone who goes to see a primary care physician will be asked if they are up-to-date with a booster and recommended to get the bivalent booster. So the impact of trying to say the vaccines are dangerous persuades some Americans into being afraid of the vaccine, but it hasn’t had any impact within public health recommendations. So the dam is not breaking in terms of convincing anyone important to change the recommendations.
Epic to not show the relative rate vs control - god tier sh*t posting.
Hint: you are just listing the background rate for issues in the population.
Pfizer has been caught in numerous lies
your tires are sputtering trying to defend this utter disaster
it's pathetic. stop. just stop.
“Adverse events” from the trial not compared to control is as good as useless. It means nothing. It’s hilarious you think you can your way out of posting such hilarious BS.
your tires are sputtering trying to defend this utter disaster
it's pathetic. stop. just stop.
“Adverse events” from the trial not compared to control is as good as useless. It means nothing. It’s hilarious you think you can your way out of posting such hilarious BS.
