Hippocampus wrote:
Barfin' Brett Ralph's again. Abortions for all, guns for none. Get off your knees Brett, you blew it
Well, it seems Barfin' Brett had no issues getting naked with an erection with his pal "Ralph" Judge. No wonder Judge went into hiding.
we out wrote:
The details I give of Kavanaugh are from his own comments and those of his college roommate. As for his drinking, did you make nothing of the notation of numerous parties and get togethers with beer ("I like beer," says the justice) that summer, the 100 keg or bust note in the Yearbook, which he admits to having written, and so forth? The points you are raising have nothing to do with anything. What if she is a surfer and a psychologist or even flies to the moon on weekends? What do I care? How is that relevant? You are no lawyer.
Drinking beer does not make you a rapist. So what’s the point? In regards to the Surfer Psychologist she has no facts to support her allegation. I think she is not credible and my perception is she is a nut job. Manipulated by Feinstein and other political operatives. Believe what you wish. For now it is still a free country.
Does Kavanaugh like beer?!! How would one know?
Fat hurts wrote:
The reason Dr. Ford doesn't remember how she got home is:
1. How she got home wasn't important to her.
2. She had just been attacked and frightened.
3. She kept "replaying" the attack in her head. Her brain was busy reinforcing the memory of the trauma instead of encoding the details about how she got home.
You forgot -
4. It never happened, so she wouldn't have a memory of a)where she was, b) how she got there, c) how she got home, d) what day it was, e) what year it was.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
It is already starting to unravel:
https://mobile.twitter.com/McAllisterDen/status/1046093850354372608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1046116016932233217&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fnews%2F2018-09-29%2F2nd-kavanaugh-accuser-agrees-cooperate-fbi-avenatti-client-ignored
I guess Silent Sam didn’t shoot his gun when she walked by.
Yummm. Time out for Chicken. Nothing like a bag of bones after a night of drinking...I mean studying.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Isn’t that nice you know such information about Judge Kavanaugh. Now tell us the intimate details of the mindset of the Surfer Psychologist. Please tell us what drove her to couples therapy? Perhaps deep sexual repression or frigidity caused by the #metoo movement.
Really? You are full of it.
Honestly you sound like Brett. Unhinged, whining about the process, assigning conspiracy, and probably guilty of something yourself. If you were actually paying attention, instead of seething because the white privileged guy was actually questioned, you would've known the reason for the therapy. Just because your "wife" has those issues doesn't mean every women does. Project much?
No dummy (ghost) you are in way over your head and you are talking out of your ass. A non-scientist but just a doofus internet troll. Why not stfu for once?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
we out wrote:
The details I give of Kavanaugh are from his own comments and those of his college roommate. As for his drinking, did you make nothing of the notation of numerous parties and get togethers with beer ("I like beer," says the justice) that summer, the 100 keg or bust note in the Yearbook, which he admits to having written, and so forth? The points you are raising have nothing to do with anything. What if she is a surfer and a psychologist or even flies to the moon on weekends? What do I care? How is that relevant? You are no lawyer.
Drinking beer does not make you a rapist. So what’s the point? In regards to the Surfer Psychologist she has no facts to support her allegation. I think she is not credible and my perception is she is a nut job. Manipulated by Feinstein and other political operatives. Believe what you wish. For now it is still a free country.
As far as I know nobody's accused him of being a rapist--but it certainly seems like he was heavily abusing alcohol towards the end of his high school years and into early college. He was extremely evasive regarding his teenage drinking habits, and he seemed pretty damn nervous at mentions of both Mark Judge and questions on whether he'd ever suffered from blackouts or memory loss due to drinking.
I think it's entirely possible that 1) the event took place and Kavanaugh has zero memory of it, or 2) the event took place and Kavanaugh, in an inebriated state, went too far with roughhousing and didn't realize how aggressive his actions were.
The third and fourth possibilities--that one of Kavanaugh or Ford is knowingly lying about the assault--just don't seem likely. Ford first mentioned the event six years ago and came forward under immense duress here--she's faced death threats, for God's sake. On the flip side, Kavanaugh truly seems to have no recollection of either her or the event.
Either way, why appoint Kavanaugh to a lifetime SCOTUS position with this cloud over him? There are dozens of conservative judges out there with equally impressive credentials, all of whom could enter the SCOTUS unencumbered. What's the point of pushing forward a candidate with multiple assault accusations and a murky history? There's still time for another pick--Amy Barrett, for example, who seems like a great candidate--to go through.
Toast of Igloi wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Isn’t that nice you know such information about Judge Kavanaugh. Now tell us the intimate details of the mindset of the Surfer Psychologist. Please tell us what drove her to couples therapy? Perhaps deep sexual repression or frigidity caused by the #metoo movement.
Really? You are full of it.
Honestly you sound like Brett. Unhinged, whining about the process, assigning conspiracy, and probably guilty of something yourself. If you were actually paying attention, instead of seething because the white privileged guy was actually questioned, you would've known the reason for the therapy. Just because your "wife" has those issues doesn't mean every women does. Project much?
Aren’t you the poor guy married to the #metoo hag? If so, no need to project.
give up the ghost wrote:
No dummy (ghost) you are in way over your head and you are talking out of your ass. A non-scientist but just a doofus internet troll. Why not stfu for once?
Nah, too much fun sparing with light weights.
you brought it up for a reason. First hand experience ?
American Flag Shorts wrote:
Either way, why appoint Kavanaugh to a lifetime SCOTUS position with this cloud over him? There are dozens of conservative judges out there with equally impressive credentials, all of whom could enter the SCOTUS unencumbered. What's the point of pushing forward a candidate with multiple assault accusations and a murky history? There's still time for another pick--Amy Barrett, for example, who seems like a great candidate--to go through.
Yeah, lets go for "another pick" and really set a precedent for the future by going for someone else because the chosen one has an uncorroborated, unproven, his word against hers situation.
Idiot.
Toast of Igloi wrote:
you brought it up for a reason. First hand experience ?
Nah, I’d never date a #metoo hag let alone marry one.
Crazy blasey is now accusing Clarence Thomas of also participating. Part of her hippocampus.
American Flag Shorts wrote:
Either way, why appoint Kavanaugh to a lifetime SCOTUS position with this cloud over him? There are dozens of conservative judges out there with equally impressive credentials, all of whom could enter the SCOTUS unencumbered. What's the point of pushing forward a candidate with multiple assault accusations and a murky history? There's still time for another pick--Amy Barrett, for example, who seems like a great candidate--to go through.
Sorry, Amy's a no go as she's got a cloud hanging over her and I've got all these accusations to bring against her from her murky history.
Next nomination please.
Crazy blasey wrote:
Crazy blasey is now accusing Clarence Thomas of also participating. Part of her hippocampus.
Bill Clinton's in the frame too.
What was most specious about Kavanaugh's testimony was that he indicated all the parties in his calendar, which his parents would have seen!, and that the fact that he was not around most weekends shows he could not have done it. He was there during the week and had a number of "gatherings" with his friends. It is entirely possible that the incident occurred then.
Drinking beer does not make you a rapist, but getting drunk and passing out frequently, ralph club member as well, indicates that he simply does not know what he claims to know, that he did not do things while x-faced, that he does not remember. Then again, maybe he does remember and cannot believe he has to face this before his entitled position is sealed.
Lets create chaos in future. wrote:
American Flag Shorts wrote:
Either way, why appoint Kavanaugh to a lifetime SCOTUS position with this cloud over him? There are dozens of conservative judges out there with equally impressive credentials, all of whom could enter the SCOTUS unencumbered. What's the point of pushing forward a candidate with multiple assault accusations and a murky history? There's still time for another pick--Amy Barrett, for example, who seems like a great candidate--to go through.
Yeah, lets go for "another pick" and really set a precedent for the future by going for someone else because the chosen one has an uncorroborated, unproven, his word against hers situation.
Idiot.
The slippery slope argument is just silly. I highly doubt that there are many other SCOTUS candidates with yearbooks indicating their membership in the "100 kegs or bust club" and books written about them frequently drinking to blackout during their teenage years--and it's really the drinking clouding Kavanaugh's testimony here.
The "he said" side of the "he said / she said" loses a lot of credibility when coming from a man whose history of drinking to the point of memory loss at parties is documented. If this were truly a simple "he said / she said" situation with an otherwise impeccable candidate, I have no doubt that Kavanaugh would go through along party lines w/o all that much deliberation.
Rather, I have no doubt that that candidate would go through along party lines without issue.
And of course, any comment about candidates only going through along party lines is pointless at this point--the blockade of the Garland nomination all but assured that future presidents will only have SCOTUS judges confirmed when their parties hold the senate. Quite a sorry situation.