What do you have to do in this country to be charged with sedition? What degeneracy do you have to do for the Republicans to turn against you?
Kari Lake, a Republican candidate for Arizona governor, said she "would not have certified" the 2020 election results.
Former President Trump endorsed Lake after she suggested he should be "added" to Mount Rushmore.
Lake, a former Phoenix news anchor, has repeatedly echoed Trump's false claims of election fraud.
Trollminator wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
It's not enough black support for him to win in 2024. He has also lost the independents.
Right, until the election comes and they go out and vote for him. You cannot wishful think him to lose - it doesn’t work like that no matter how many fake news posts you make from now until election. Enjoy your loss and keep your head buried deep in that fat orange ahole! 👋🏻🎻😂
Biden continues to lose black support.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1444380308183437312CNBC ran some numbers on the worst states for business and 9/10 have Republican governors.
Yeah let's definitely let those right wing idiots run the country into the ground again from DC. They always do run us into the ground. Every freaking time.
Worst 10, worst to slightly less worse
AZ
TX
NV
MO
GA
AL
AR
LA
IN
again, just what do you have to do in this country to be charged with sedition?
They are telling us point by point exactly how they are going to take over the government. Point by point.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/election-subversion-donald-trump-allies-090019878.html
Nobody here wants to talk about what is actually in the infrastructure package. But I just did some calculations on the price.
Now the whole thing is paid for with taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. So it has no effect on the debt. It's all paid for.
But let's say instead of raising taxes on the wealthy we just cut the defense budget to pay for it. What would happen to defense spending?
Well, the progressives want a $3.5 trillion package. But that's spread out over 10 years. So it's only $350 billion per year. The defense budget is $778 billion per year. So that would take defense spending down to $428 billion.
Oh no, we can't do that! How will we defend ourselves against the Chinese and the Russians?
Fat hurts US defense spending: $428 billion
China defense spending: $252 billion
Russia defense spending: $62 billion
We would be just fine, thank you. In fact, we would bet better than fine. We would have happier, healthier citizens and maybe even a planet where our grandchildren can survive.
$3.5 trillion over 10 years is a really small number for clean air, clean water, roads, bridges, medicine, child care, and a whole lot more.
Do you want a good life or do you want wasteful defense spending?
Fat hurts wrote:
Nobody here wants to talk about what is actually in the infrastructure package. But I just did some calculations on the price.
Now the whole thing is paid for with taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. So it has no effect on the debt. It's all paid for.
But let's say instead of raising taxes on the wealthy we just cut the defense budget to pay for it. What would happen to defense spending?
Well, the progressives want a $3.5 trillion package. But that's spread out over 10 years. So it's only $350 billion per year. The defense budget is $778 billion per year. So that would take defense spending down to $428 billion.
Oh no, we can't do that! How will we defend ourselves against the Chinese and the Russians?
Fat hurts US defense spending: $428 billion
China defense spending: $252 billion
Russia defense spending: $62 billion
We would be just fine, thank you. In fact, we would bet better than fine. We would have happier, healthier citizens and maybe even a planet where our grandchildren can survive.
$3.5 trillion over 10 years is a really small number for clean air, clean water, roads, bridges, medicine, child care, and a whole lot more.
Do you want a good life or do you want wasteful defense spending?
It's funny, because not only does it just not even come close to working like that at all, but you'd also throw unemployment probably over 10% if you cut that much in defense spending YoY.
Prof. Racket wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Nobody here wants to talk about what is actually in the infrastructure package. But I just did some calculations on the price.
Now the whole thing is paid for with taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. So it has no effect on the debt. It's all paid for.
But let's say instead of raising taxes on the wealthy we just cut the defense budget to pay for it. What would happen to defense spending?
Well, the progressives want a $3.5 trillion package. But that's spread out over 10 years. So it's only $350 billion per year. The defense budget is $778 billion per year. So that would take defense spending down to $428 billion.
Oh no, we can't do that! How will we defend ourselves against the Chinese and the Russians?
Fat hurts US defense spending: $428 billion
China defense spending: $252 billion
Russia defense spending: $62 billion
We would be just fine, thank you. In fact, we would bet better than fine. We would have happier, healthier citizens and maybe even a planet where our grandchildren can survive.
$3.5 trillion over 10 years is a really small number for clean air, clean water, roads, bridges, medicine, child care, and a whole lot more.
Do you want a good life or do you want wasteful defense spending?
It's funny, because not only does it just not even come close to working like that at all, but you'd also throw unemployment probably over 10% if you cut that much in defense spending YoY.
Nope. You would be pumping money directly into the economy instead of onto the balance sheets of defense contractors. You would get more people back to work.
But please do tell us how it really works.
Fat hurts wrote:
Prof. Racket wrote:
It's funny, because not only does it just not even come close to working like that at all, but you'd also throw unemployment probably over 10% if you cut that much in defense spending YoY.
Nope. You would be pumping money directly into the economy instead of onto the balance sheets of defense contractors. You would get more people back to work.
But please do tell us how it really works.
You live in La La land. Radical leftists now own the dem party.\
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/progressives-democratic-party-david-marcusGhost of Disco Gary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Right, until the election comes and they go out and vote for him. You cannot wishful think him to lose - it doesn’t work like that no matter how many fake news posts you make from now until election. Enjoy your loss and keep your head buried deep in that fat orange ahole! 👋🏻🎻😂
Biden continues to lose black support.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1444380308183437312
Some people are loathe to admit it but, liberals and conservatives have the exact same responses here:
Republican: "I don't like Trump, but the alternative is HRC (or Biden), so I have to vote for him anyway"
Democrat: "I don't like Biden, but the alternative is Trump (or whoever), so I have to vote for him anyway"
The only time it matters is when people choose not to vote because they don't like their party's incumbent.
Fat hurts wrote:
Nobody here wants to talk about what is actually in the infrastructure package. But I just did some calculations on the price.
Now the whole thing is paid for with taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. So it has no effect on the debt. It's all paid for.
But let's say instead of raising taxes on the wealthy we just cut the defense budget to pay for it. What would happen to defense spending?
Well, the progressives want a $3.5 trillion package. But that's spread out over 10 years. So it's only $350 billion per year. The defense budget is $778 billion per year. So that would take defense spending down to $428 billion.
Oh no, we can't do that! How will we defend ourselves against the Chinese and the Russians?
Fat hurts US defense spending: $428 billion
China defense spending: $252 billion
Russia defense spending: $62 billion
We would be just fine, thank you. In fact, we would bet better than fine. We would have happier, healthier citizens and maybe even a planet where our grandchildren can survive.
$3.5 trillion over 10 years is a really small number for clean air, clean water, roads, bridges, medicine, child care, and a whole lot more.
Do you want a good life or do you want wasteful defense spending?
You actually believe in the Global Warming crap? LOL. Do you not understand how the Earth goes through warming and cooling cycles? Do you not know this??? LOL>
Fat Hurts - have you ever read anything about the history of the Earth? You do know that it goes through cooling and warming cycles? Do you know that? The Earth is going through a slight warming cycle but it will go through a cooling cycle soon. YOu do know that, yes? Or do you think it will get warmer and warmer and hotter and hotter until it explodes? Are you actually saying this? Do you know how idiotic this sounds? Are you 12 years old?
CountChocula wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Biden continues to lose black support.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1444380308183437312Some people are loathe to admit it but, liberals and conservatives have the exact same responses here:
Republican: "I don't like Trump, but the alternative is HRC (or Biden), so I have to vote for him anyway"
Democrat: "I don't like Biden, but the alternative is Trump (or whoever), so I have to vote for him anyway"
The only time it matters is when people choose not to vote because they don't like their party's incumbent.
Some people are loathe to admit it but everybody has the exact same responses here:
Group A: "I don't like the taste of dog sh!t, but the alternative is Filet Miñon, so I am going to eat it anyway"
Group B: "I don't like the taste of Filet Miñon, but the alternative is dog sh!t, so I am going to eat it anyway"
The fact that you can point out a symmetry does not make the two sides equal (or even similar).
Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:
Fat Hurts - have you ever read anything about the history of the Earth? You do know that it goes through cooling and warming cycles? Do you know that? The Earth is going through a slight warming cycle but it will go through a cooling cycle soon. YOu do know that, yes? Or do you think it will get warmer and warmer and hotter and hotter until it explodes? Are you actually saying this? Do you know how idiotic this sounds? Are you 12 years old?
The Earth is really, REALLY old. Therefore it is impossible for human activities to be having a significant impact on the Earth's climate.
Real Obvi wrote:
CountChocula wrote:
Some people are loathe to admit it but, liberals and conservatives have the exact same responses here:
Republican: "I don't like Trump, but the alternative is HRC (or Biden), so I have to vote for him anyway"
Democrat: "I don't like Biden, but the alternative is Trump (or whoever), so I have to vote for him anyway"
The only time it matters is when people choose not to vote because they don't like their party's incumbent.
Some people are loathe to admit it but everybody has the exact same responses here:
Group A: "I don't like the taste of dog sh!t, but the alternative is Filet Miñon, so I am going to eat it anyway"
Group B: "I don't like the taste of Filet Miñon, but the alternative is dog sh!t, so I am going to eat it anyway"
The fact that you can point out a symmetry does not make the two sides equal (or even similar).
Yep, so when it comes time to vote and people aren't exactly crazy about Biden, they will pull the trigger anyway because the other option is the stone cold loser trump who completed the total radicalization of the GQP and the right wing base, not to mention accelerated the destruction of whatever democracy we had.
Real Obvi wrote:
CountChocula wrote:
Some people are loathe to admit it but, liberals and conservatives have the exact same responses here:
Republican: "I don't like Trump, but the alternative is HRC (or Biden), so I have to vote for him anyway"
Democrat: "I don't like Biden, but the alternative is Trump (or whoever), so I have to vote for him anyway"
The only time it matters is when people choose not to vote because they don't like their party's incumbent.
Some people are loathe to admit it but everybody has the exact same responses here:
Group A: "I don't like the taste of dog sh!t, but the alternative is Filet Miñon, so I am going to eat it anyway"
Group B: "I don't like the taste of Filet Miñon, but the alternative is dog sh!t, so I am going to eat it anyway"
The fact that you can point out a symmetry does not make the two sides equal (or even similar).
nah Gary and Igy actively like what trump is and represents. Trump is a model of American idealism and manhood to them. sally claims she doesn't like trump but that's obvi false from what she says on the thread. Most Trumpers actively think Trump is the model for America. Only a few say 'eh well at least he's our jergoff.'
I don't think anyone on the Dems side is much of a fan of Biden, though. They tend to like Biden because he is reasonable and hires quality people to actually run things. And isn't Trump.
No, I don't think those who followed Sinema are right wingers in disguise, if that's what you are suggesting. ;)
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/far-extremist-pretended-blm-supporter-044745778.htmlIllegal alien followed Sen Sinema into a bathroom & harassed her in the stall.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1444801839220801537