Official Covid Vaccine thread

Fall out wrote:

trashcan wrote:

I find this story very curious. Did you start out at the surgeon’s or with a pcp? A quick look at any middle of the road medicine site will tell you that normal care starts with conservative care, then, if needed, aspiration, and all of that fails then surgery could be considered. Doing a self-aspiration presents a significant unnecessary risk.

Link:stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditi...

You’re obviously a doctor yourself. I’m happy that you know the correct treatment for filled bursa sacs. What you have said is exactly what I expected to hear when I went in. Clearly, not all doctors are equal. Again, I have a dozen other similar experiences. But, I have encountered high quality doctors who take their profession seriously and keep up. I see Doctors McCullough and Kory as high quality doctors. Have they both yet been excommunicated from medicine for daring to dissent? That kind of blackballing only hurts the medical profession.

Operating a syringe is not a significant unnecessary risk. You’re being arrogant again with that remark.

2600 bro wrote:

Fall out wrote:

You’re obviously a doctor yourself. I’m happy that you know the correct treatment for filled bursa sacs. What you have said is exactly what I expected to hear when I went in. Clearly, not all doctors are equal. Again, I have a dozen other similar experiences. But, I have encountered high quality doctors who take their profession seriously and keep up. I see Doctors McCullough and Kory as high quality doctors. Have they both yet been excommunicated from medicine for daring to dissent? That kind of blackballing only hurts the medical profession.

Operating a syringe is not a significant unnecessary risk. You’re being arrogant again with that remark.

Go look at McCulloughs predictions dating back to 2021.
All of them. Score then based on accuracy.
Then ask “is he a doctor or a substack subscription seller”

Youve been tricked by the “alt” media. You’re a sheep.

trashcan wrote:

Fall out wrote:

Yes, Any doctor who has the belief that non-doctors are simply not smart enough to understand this topic are extremely arrogant. Not smart enough to interpret a scientific paper. Not smart enough to know that a third of studies, that have passed peer review and been published, are fraudulent. Not smart enough to understand statistics. Not smart enough to understand how pharmaceutical companies utilize many tricks to skew, manipulate, and hide data that stand in the way of their billions in profit. Not smart enough to understand what agency capture means and the evidence that it exists. Not smart enough to have read the Twitter Files to understand how Fauci drove the narrative and destroyed any dissenting Voice or opinion. Not smart enough to interpret VAERS data. Any of these beliefs makes a person extremely arrogant. As you have implied, most doctors hold these beliefs, ergo…

To be honest, you sound extremely arrogant as well. I’ve never studied medicine in school so I must also be a “layperson”. Never mind my advanced degrees, long career in tech, and decade of experience investing in early stage bio Pharma.
I’m sorry but the average doctor is a half-wit compared to this layperson.

I rarely make generalizations, unless the preponderance of my person experiences warrants it. It is interesting that you ask this since you yourself are suggesting that doctors hold all non-doctors (the rest of humanity) in quite low regard.

You misinterpret me in an extreme manner. Saying that a bright person close to a process will understand that process better than a bright person more removed from that process doesn’t strike me as arrogant(obviously there can be the rare exception).

as for the vaers data it appears that doctors are interpreting the data in the way it is intend as described in the vaers website itself.

Most doctors i know are quite suspicious of pharma motives.l, hence the clinical trials registry.

Finally, saying that the average doctor is a half-wit compared to you strikes me as the height of arrogance. Such an attitude would likely lead to negative interactions,