Russia fired scores of missiles into Ukraine early on Thursday, targeting Kyiv and other cities including Lviv in the west and Odesa in the southwest, sending people rushing to shelters and knocking out power in one of Moscow's largest aerial assaults.
Have you noticed, pro-Ukrainian fanatics on this thread are attempting to distract by making personal attacks against anyone not a pro-Ukrainian fanatic? Pro-Ukrainians on here district by overly glamorizing ever time Ukrainian troops kill. Pro-Ukrainians whine about Russians being too mean. Do pro-Ukrainians brag about gaining territory? No. Do pro-Ukrainians brag about greater k.i.a.s? No. Some say Putin suffers from cancer. Ten years from now, Biden, Pelosi and Putin may all be dead. If that is or isn't the future, there will be no Ukrainian victory, today or ten years from now. President Z needs to negotiate an end to this without his handlers from U.S. executive branch. This is barbaric. It's awful how U.S. and the rest of NATO have wasted billions on a gradual loss. Any effort for NATO to pay for a possible victory versus Russia walks the world too close to WW3.
They don't care about Ukraine. They're just narcissists. They think pretending to care about Ukraine makes them good people so they're all in.
Obama said mean things and refused to send Ukraine weapons.
Now I'm confused.
I thought the talking point was that under Obama, Victoria Nuland overthrew the Ukraine's Russian puppet government in 2014? Surely this is way more badass than merely sending weapons.
Directly causing a war which results in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people for absolutely no benefit to anyone but the corrupt isn't the feather in your cap you think it is.
Russia's military strategy has always been mass casualties and mass artillery.
They aren't losing men because they are incompetent they are losing men because they don't care. Their strategy has always been to out bleed their enemy.
Never in Russian history has Russia negotiated for peace before they lost at least 500,000 dead in a war.
Oh good. We’re close to 20% of the way to this war being over. I’m so glad that Russia is fighting like World War 1.
They fight ALL of their wars this way. It's only news to you because you've never read a book.
Washington will fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian
It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia eats Europe.
Look at what your zeal to bash Biden has led you to post. Just step back from your rageaholism for one minute, seek that "moment of clarity" your type finds so elusive, and contemplate just how massively stupid the bolded statement above is.
Most needed piece of Russian equipment : stretchers to haul off Russian dead and wounded
Wait, what? Aren't all the Russians already dead? Who's there to pick them up if they're all dead? Cant be any wounded? You said so. They be all dead ya'll. Wait, how do they have any equipment and know how? They cant possibly have any stretchers, they cant possibly manufacture stretchers, and they cant possibly know how to use stretchers! OMG, whats going on???? I'm so confused. Who is helping the Russians? How are they existing? Is this a deepfake?
It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia eats Europe.
Look at what your zeal to bash Biden has led you to post. Just step back from your rageaholism for one minute, seek that "moment of clarity" your type finds so elusive, and contemplate just how massively stupid the bolded statement above is.
What the hell does diaper boy have to do with Russia and Europe???
1. There are absolutely ZERO scenarios where Russia is capable of taking Europe.
2. The entire hysteria over Ukraine is the idiotic fear that Russia won't stop with Ukraine and will push right on into Europe. They couldn't even if they wanted to.
3. Even if they wanted to it would be EUROPE'S job to pay for stopping it.
4. If by some miracle or alien intervention Russia was able to take Europe it wouldn't matter much to the US economy. We would either trade with Russia, get the stuff somewhere else, or make it ourselves.
Most needed piece of Russian equipment : stretchers to haul off Russian dead and wounded
Wait, what? Aren't all the Russians already dead? Who's there to pick them up if they're all dead? Cant be any wounded? You said so. They be all dead ya'll. Wait, how do they have any equipment and know how? They cant possibly have any stretchers, they cant possibly manufacture stretchers, and they cant possibly know how to use stretchers! OMG, whats going on???? I'm so confused. Who is helping the Russians? How are they existing? Is this a deepfake?
How does typing out a bunch of highly exaggerated and really silly looking strawman statements help your pro-Russia arguments? I think you know the post won't work, which is why you switched names to post it. But why post it at all? It just looks desperate.
They fight ALL of their wars this way. It's only news to you because you've never read a book.
I guess that’s why they’re not particularly well regarded.
Governments representing over half the world's population think the US is the problem and Russia is just fine or at the very least equally problematic.
Wait, what? Aren't all the Russians already dead? Who's there to pick them up if they're all dead? Cant be any wounded? You said so. They be all dead ya'll. Wait, how do they have any equipment and know how? They cant possibly have any stretchers, they cant possibly manufacture stretchers, and they cant possibly know how to use stretchers! OMG, whats going on???? I'm so confused. Who is helping the Russians? How are they existing? Is this a deepfake?
How does typing out a bunch of highly exaggerated and really silly looking strawman statements help your pro-Russia arguments? I think you know the post won't work, which is why you switched names to post it. But why post it at all? It just looks desperate.
Your consistent idiotic claim that anyone who isn't pro-Ukrainian is a Russian stooge is the ultimate strawman and you and the other sheeple proudly post it all the time.
It’s amazing that you can’t distinguish an ability to lob missiles at apartment buildings hundreds of miles from the frontlines (which Russia is able to do) and an ability to occupy territory / make strategic gains at the frontlines (which Russia is inept at, and has resorted to sending waves of barely armed soldiers against fortified machine gun positions, with predictable results.)
Read a book.
Russia's military strategy has always been mass casualties and mass artillery.
They aren't losing men because they are incompetent they are losing men because they don't care. Their strategy has always been to out bleed their enemy.
Never in Russian history has Russia negotiated for peace before they lost at least 500,000 dead in a war.
What do you call their retreat from Afghanistan? Read a book, bro.
Russia's military strategy has always been mass casualties and mass artillery.
They aren't losing men because they are incompetent they are losing men because they don't care. Their strategy has always been to out bleed their enemy.
Never in Russian history has Russia negotiated for peace before they lost at least 500,000 dead in a war.
What do you call their retreat from Afghanistan? Read a book, bro.
They didn't negotiate peace they left.
They decided it wasn't worth the effort in the midst of their entire economic system collapsing.
Look at what your zeal to bash Biden has led you to post. Just step back from your rageaholism for one minute, seek that "moment of clarity" your type finds so elusive, and contemplate just how massively stupid the bolded statement above is.
1. There are absolutely ZERO scenarios where Russia is capable of taking Europe.
Agreed. And that is because of the US military and NATO and willingness to defend Europe with militaries far superior to Russia's. But since you agree with that, why post this -- "It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia eats Europe." That remains a massively stupid statement.
2. The entire hysteria over Ukraine is the idiotic fear that Russia won't stop with Ukraine and will push right on into Europe. They couldn't even if they wanted to.
The world reaction to Russia's invasion of Ukraine is not hysteria. The fear that Russia won't stop with Ukraine is not hysteria -- it's based on Russia's statements and behaviors. Russia certainly wants to invade large parts of Europe. Your assessment that "they couldn't even if they wanted to" is a sea-change from earlier assessments of yours that Russian could occupy Ukraine in 5 days. There was a time, not too long ago, when you strongly believed in the military might of Russia.
The fact that Russia can't occupy Ukrainian land 50 miles over the Russian border does not change the fact that Russia is populated by millions of nationalist serfs who strongly support any invasion attempted by the bunch of thuggish imperialist tyrants running the Russian government. They want all their Soviet lands back, and more. No matter how inept Russia is, it remains a dangerous enemy of the US and its Allies, and you are well aware of that.
3. Even if they wanted to it would be EUROPE'S job to pay for stopping it.
Very few Americans agree with that incredibly stupid opinion about the US defending its strategic interests in Europe. I'll bet you don't even agree with it, but just like to pretend to be some internet contrarian (who constantly contradicts himself in the process). When you typed "It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia east Europe," I'll bet you knew that was a stupid impulsive thing to say, and didn't even believe it yourself. It's stupid, right? You don't believe it for a second.
I guess that’s why they’re not particularly well regarded.
Governments representing over half the world's population think the US is the problem and Russia is just fine or at the very least equally problematic.
Ummm . . . those governments do NOT represent the populations of the nations that they rule. That's kind of the point of their non-representative governments.
How does typing out a bunch of highly exaggerated and really silly looking strawman statements help your pro-Russia arguments? I think you know the post won't work, which is why you switched names to post it. But why post it at all? It just looks desperate.
Your consistent idiotic claim that anyone who isn't pro-Ukrainian is a Russian stooge is the ultimate strawman and you and the other sheeple proudly post it all the time.
I'm just asking why you felt the need to change names to make that pro-Russia post. I think you have a tiered hierarchy for all your sock puppets, with each individual one utilized depending on the level of overall stupidity of the post under consideration. That "all Russians are dead" guy gets the toughest assignments.
1. There are absolutely ZERO scenarios where Russia is capable of taking Europe.
Agreed. And that is because of the US military and NATO and willingness to defend Europe with militaries far superior to Russia's. But since you agree with that, why post this -- "It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia eats Europe." That remains a massively stupid statement.
2. The entire hysteria over Ukraine is the idiotic fear that Russia won't stop with Ukraine and will push right on into Europe. They couldn't even if they wanted to.
The world reaction to Russia's invasion of Ukraine is not hysteria. The fear that Russia won't stop with Ukraine is not hysteria -- it's based on Russia's statements and behaviors. Russia certainly wants to invade large parts of Europe. Your assessment that "they couldn't even if they wanted to" is a sea-change from earlier assessments of yours that Russian could occupy Ukraine in 5 days. There was a time, not too long ago, when you strongly believed in the military might of Russia.
The fact that Russia can't occupy Ukrainian land 50 miles over the Russian border does not change the fact that Russia is populated by millions of nationalist serfs who strongly support any invasion attempted by the bunch of thuggish imperialist tyrants running the Russian government. They want all their Soviet lands back, and more. No matter how inept Russia is, it remains a dangerous enemy of the US and its Allies, and you are well aware of that.
3. Even if they wanted to it would be EUROPE'S job to pay for stopping it.
Very few Americans agree with that incredibly stupid opinion about the US defending its strategic interests in Europe. I'll bet you don't even agree with it, but just like to pretend to be some internet contrarian (who constantly contradicts himself in the process). When you typed "It doesn't impact the US at all if Russia east Europe," I'll bet you knew that was a stupid impulsive thing to say, and didn't even believe it yourself. It's stupid, right? You don't believe it for a second.
The USA's position as the top dog on the planet does not change whether Russia eats Europe or not. Europe is a dying continent.
It's not February 2022 it is December 2022. Russia's militarty has been completely and totally emasculated and humiliated.
The hysteria should NOT be at the same level now as it was in February yet it is for some illogical reason.
It doesn't matter what Russian "wants" to do. It has been proven that Russia can't even conquer a country that was 30% friendly to them. If you think the inept Ukrainians are putting up a fight seeing what the Poles would do to the Russians would really give you a little hard on.
Even Putin realizes that his dreams of expansion are dead. He simply wants to save face in Ukraine now so he can stay alive.
Whatever "strategic interest" you think the US has in Europe, EUROPE has a greater interest in Europe. Europe should be paying the bill not the country that's $30 TRILLION in debt with a border crisis, drug crisis, and a million other problems that are higher on the list of America's interest.
Your consistent idiotic claim that anyone who isn't pro-Ukrainian is a Russian stooge is the ultimate strawman and you and the other sheeple proudly post it all the time.
I'm just asking why you felt the need to change names to make that pro-Russia post. I think you have a tiered hierarchy for all your sock puppets, with each individual one utilized depending on the level of overall stupidity of the post under consideration. That "all Russians are dead" guy gets the toughest assignments.
That wasn't me. You're literally part of a hivemind. Your opinions are 100% interchangeable with every Democrat and neo-con in the country. Why exactly do you think there can only be 1 person who disagrees with you?