This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
In addition to being a liar, a killer, and an unscientific hack, he also loves irony.
“Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.” … spoken like he doesn’t understand what science is. 😂 Lucky for him, his religious followers definitely don’t.
Actually they do. The anti Covid vax types have been limited to places like blogs, YouTube comedians, and Rumble. Fauci is still highly respected within MD circles, but not with comedians, low education viewers, and certain (mostly) right wing media personalities.
At this point I’m not sure which is dragging the other down more… Fauci or the gutless, unethical, servile doctors that blindly follow. Either way, neither are nearly as respected as they imagine themselves to be.
Fauci is widely considered to be in like the top 5 experts in infectious disease worldwide. It’s hilarious he became a target due to the massive amounts of misinformation, but during a public health emergency all sorts of weirdos post stuff online and so we are where we are. Funny but true
Meanwhile, John Ioannidis is considered to be possibly the top epidemiologist worldwide. When he wrote an article in 2020 questioning government statistics on covid deaths, he was widely trashed. Nothing hilarious about that.
To be fair to Shtbagger, I do know doctors that have laughed out loud at antivaxxers. It was magical, I think if I were visiting for any medical issues I would have been cured immediately and not needed any medicine or treatment. Fortunately, that's never the case since I am an alpha vaxxer
Imagine going through life with such a warped view of the world. You look at the data and make up your own stories about what it means, and the only ones who agree with you are entertainers,comedians,etc
Fauci is widely considered to be in like the top 5 experts in infectious disease worldwide. It’s hilarious he became a target due to the massive amounts of misinformation, but during a public health emergency all sorts of weirdos post stuff online and so we are where we are. Funny but true
Meanwhile, John Ioannidis is considered to be possibly the top epidemiologist worldwide. When he wrote an article in 2020 questioning government statistics on covid deaths, he was widely trashed. Nothing hilarious about that.
Nope, not anymore. Ioannidis went all-in on Covid denial, published a bunch of trash articles, and people noticed. His reputation will never recover.
Lol DanM loves this quote but makes Fauci look too clever for his own good. Vaccination was a political game and he played it. 300k Americans decided dying was better than following mainstream medicine. Folks like DanM gleefully celebrate their deaths as well as speak fondly of their own efforts efforts to ensure as many of his countrymen died!
300k? LOL
That number was pulled out of Harambe's ass right next to a duct taped gerbil.
It’s validated and easy to calculate.
I get it, you don’t want to feel responsibility for dead Americans. But you helped kill them. Such is life. Harambe doesn’t judge… but God will at the pearly gates or whatever. Enjoy.
Actually they do. The anti Covid vax types have been limited to places like blogs, YouTube comedians, and Rumble. Fauci is still highly respected within MD circles, but not with comedians, low education viewers, and certain (mostly) right wing media personalities.
At this point I’m not sure which is dragging the other down more… Fauci or the gutless, unethical, servile doctors that blindly follow. Either way, neither are nearly as respected as they imagine themselves to be.
The gutless “doctors” are the ones writing substacks and YouTube channel, defrauding simpletons like you with “secret information” about the “vaccine coverup.” Anyone heard from Robert Malone lately lol? These guys always fade when all their BS fails to come true.
That number was pulled out of Harambe's ass right next to a duct taped gerbil.
It’s validated and easy to calculate.
I get it, you don’t want to feel responsibility for dead Americans. But you helped kill them. Such is life. Harambe doesn’t judge… but God will at the pearly gates or whatever. Enjoy.
Lol. Ever heard of significance? 300,000 is like rounding up all mile times to 1 day.
At this point I’m not sure which is dragging the other down more… Fauci or the gutless, unethical, servile doctors that blindly follow. Either way, neither are nearly as respected as they imagine themselves to be.
The gutless “doctors” are the ones writing substacks and YouTube channel, defrauding simpletons like you with “secret information” about the “vaccine coverup.” Anyone heard from Robert Malone lately lol? These guys always fade when all their BS fails to come true.
Right. Only the PhDs supporting your arguments can be trusted. All others are whack jobs. This should be the definition of “religious science”. Agree or be excommunicated. 😂
KFOR, an Oklahoma news channel, reported last week that rural hospitals throughout the state were in danger of becoming overwhelmed by victims of a very specific poisoning: overdoses of ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug promoted by vaccine skeptics as a possible treatment for COVID-19.
The story went viral, and was seized upon by the mainstream media. But its central claim is substantially untrue.
The meat of the story is a series of quotes from an Oklahoma doctor, Jason McElyea, who appears to attribute overcrowding at local hospitals to a deluge of ivermectin overdoses.
"The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated," McElyea told KFOR's Katelyn Ogle.
The story ran under the headline: "Patients overdosing on ivermectin backing up rural Oklahoma hospitals, ambulances." It was quickly picked up by national news outlets, such as Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and the New York Daily News. Numerous high-profile media figures, including MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, tweeted about ivermectin overdoses straining Oklahoma hospitals—the implication being that the right-wing embrace of a crank COVID-19 cure was dangerous not only for the people who consumed it but for the stability of the entire medical system.
It was a story that appeared to confirm many of the mainstream media's biases about the recklessness of the rubes. But it's extremely misleading. There is, in fact, little reason to believe a purported strain on Oklahoma hospitals is caused by ivermectin overdoses; one hospital served by the doctor quoted in the KFOR article released a statement saying it has not treated any ivermectin overdoses, nor has it been forced to turn away patients.
This is yet another example of the mainstream media lazily circulating a narrative that flatters the worldview of the liberal audience, without bothering to check on any of the details. Additional reporting was sorely needed here, and has now completely undermined the central point of the story.
FWIW, this is a pretty definitive article on the lab origin theory of SARS-CoV-2. It's long so here is one of several important facts in the article that points to a lab origin. It shows that a nucleotide sequence in the already unusual furin cleavage site is IDENTICAL to a 2016 US patent filed by Moderna.
A peculiar feature of the nucleotide sequence encoding the PRRA furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is its two consecutive CGG codons. This arginine codon is rare in coronaviruses: relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of CGG in pangolin CoV is 0, in bat CoV 0.08, in SARS-CoV 0.19, in MERS-CoV 0.25, and in SARS-CoV-2 0.299 (8). A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016. On the question of whether this perfect match could be mere coincidence, the authors noted: Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21×10^-11 [approximately 1 in 3 trillion].
There is also evidence that gain of function research being done. It's in the article. Read it if you're interested.
I get it, you don’t want to feel responsibility for dead Americans. But you helped kill them. Such is life. Harambe doesn’t judge… but God will at the pearly gates or whatever. Enjoy.
Lol. Ever heard of significance? 300,000 is like rounding up all mile times to 1 day.
FWIW, this is a pretty definitive article on the lab origin theory of SARS-CoV-2. It's long so here is one of several important facts in the article that points to a lab origin. It shows that a nucleotide sequence in the already unusual furin cleavage site is IDENTICAL to a 2016 US patent filed by Moderna.
A peculiar feature of the nucleotide sequence encoding the PRRA furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is its two consecutive CGG codons. This arginine codon is rare in coronaviruses: relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of CGG in pangolin CoV is 0, in bat CoV 0.08, in SARS-CoV 0.19, in MERS-CoV 0.25, and in SARS-CoV-2 0.299 (8). A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016. On the question of whether this perfect match could be mere coincidence, the authors noted: Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21×10^-11 [approximately 1 in 3 trillion].
There is also evidence that gain of function research being done. It's in the article. Read it if you're interested.
This is really old news isn’t it. The rare codon debate happened in 2021.
Acting like rare codons popping out is proof of engineering is a huge stretch. The fact people kinda just added to the list of evidence and kept looking is telling. Unsure why Pete Mc brings it up again.
May 13, 2022 – A new analysis by researchers at Brown School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Microsoft AI for Health shows that vaccines could have prevented at least 318,000 Covid-19 deaths between January 2021 and April 2022.
Brown School of Public Health and Microsoft AI for Health release a new dashboard that shows vaccine preventable death nationwide and for each state, providing critical insights for state and federal Covid-19 response teams.
May 13, 2022 – A new analysis by researchers at Brown School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Microsoft AI for Health shows that vaccines could have prevented at least 318,000 Covid-19 deaths between January 2021 and April 2022.
A large share of the nearly 1 million people who died of COVID in the U.S. may have lived if they'd gotten vaccinated. A new analysis shows how many lives could have been saved across the country.
